They work fine. But I had to go to a lot of trouble to get Yesod to render
routes in a pure function. It may instead make more sense to have each
alert have an assocated IO action, and a single route that runs the IO
action of a given alert id. I just wish I'd realized that before the past
several hours of struggling with something Yesod really doesn't want to
allow.
Avoid trying to git push/pull to special remotes, but still do transfer
scans of them, after git pull from any other remotes, so we know about
any values that have been placed on them.
When multiple downloads of a key are queued, it starts the first, but leaves the
other downloads in the queue. This ensures that we don't lose a queued
download if the one that got started failed.
Run code that pops off the next queued transfer and adds it to the active
transfer map within an allocated transfer slot, rather than before
allocating a slot. Fixes the transfers display, which had been displaying
the next transfer as a running transfer, while the previous transfer was
still running.
Currently only the web special remote is readonly, but it'd be possible to
also have readonly drives, or other remotes. These are handled in the
assistant by only downloading from them, and never trying to upload to
them.
The expensive transfer scan now scans a whole set of remotes in one pass.
So at startup, or when network comes up, it will run only once.
Note that this can result in transfers from/to higher cost remotes being
queued before other transfers of other content from/to lower cost remotes.
Before, low cost remotes were scanned first and all their transfers came
first. When multiple transfers are queued for a key, the lower cost ones
are still queued first. However, this could result in transfers from slow
remotes running for a long time while transfers of other data from faster
remotes waits.
I expect to make the transfer queue smarter about ordering
and/or make it allow multiple transfers at a time, which should eliminate
this annoyance. (Also, it was already possible to get into that situation,
for example if the network was up, lots of transfers from slow remotes
might be queued, and then a disk is mounted and its faster transfers have
to wait.)
Also note that this means I don't need to improve the code in
Assistant.Sync that currently checks if any of the reconnected remotes
have diverged, and if so, queues scans of all of them. That had been very
innefficient, but now doesn't matter.
Used by the assistant, rather than copy, this is faster because it avoids
using git ls-files, avoids checking the location log redundantly, and
runs in oneshot mode, avoiding making a commit to the git-annex branch
for every file transferred.
There are multiple reasons to do this:
* The local network may be up solid, but a route to a networked remote
is having trouble. Any transfers to it that fail should be retried.
* Someone might have wicd running, but like to bring up new networks
by hand too. This way, it'll eventually notice them.
The problem with using it here is that, if a removable drive is scanned
and gets disconnected during the scan, testing for all the files will
indicate it doesn't have them, and the scan is logged as completed
successfully, without necessary transfers being queued.
This deals with interruptions in network connectevity, by listening
for a new network interface coming up (using dbus to see when
network-manager or wicd do it), and forcing a rescan of
This seems to work pretty well.
Handled the process groups like this:
- git-annex processes started by the assistant for transfers are run in their
own process groups.
- otherwise, rely on the shell to allocate a process group for git-annex
There is potentially a problem if some other program runs git-annex
directly (not using sh -c) The program and git-annex would then be in
the same process group. If that git-annex starts a transfer and it's
canceled, the program would also get killed. May or may not be a desired
result.
Also, the new updateTransferInfo probably closes a race where it was
possible for the thread id to not be recorded in the transfer info, if
the transfer info file from the transfer process is read first.
This doesn't quite work, because canceling a transfer sends a signal
to git-annex, but not to rsync (etc).
Looked at making git-annex run in its own process group, which could then
be killed, and would kill child processes. But, rsync checks if it's
process group is the foreground process group and doesn't show progress if
not, and when git has run git-annex, if git-annex makes a new process
group, that is not the case. Also, if git has run git-annex, ctrl-c
wouldn't be propigated to it if it made a new process group.
So this seems like a blind alley, but recording it here just in case.
Now an alert tracks files that have recently been added. As a large file
is added, it will have its own alert, that then combines with the tracker
when dones.
Also used for combining sanity checker alerts, as it could possibly want to
display a lot.
This allows me to not build-depend on blaze-markup, which was causing
me some trouble when tring to build with cabal on debian. Seems debian
ships Text.Blaze.Renderer.String in two packages.
Now the javascript does an ajax call at the start to request the url
to use to poll, and the notification id is generated then, once we know
javascript is working.
Depending on how the webapp was started up and whether the user clicked on
any links in it, window.close() may be disallowed by browser security
policy. Also if that fails, display a modal dialog that nicely blackens out
the webapp.
TODO: avoid Escape closing it. Bootstrap's docs are unclear about how to do
that.
Putting the transfer on the currentTransfers atomically introduced a bug:
It checks to see if the transfer is in progress, and cancels it.
Fixed by moving that check inside the STM transaction.
This may be customised differently than the main page later on, but
for now the important thing is that this constantly refreshed page does not
allocate a new NotificationHandle each time it's loaded.
WebApp now shows changes with no delay. Comparing a running git-annex get
and the webapp side-by-side, they both show each new transfer at the same
time.
