git-annex/Command/Sync.hs

1041 lines
34 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

{- git-annex command
-
2011-12-30 20:24:30 +00:00
- Copyright 2011 Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
- Copyright 2011-2023 Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
-
- Licensed under the GNU AGPL version 3 or higher.
-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
module Command.Sync (
cmd,
CurrBranch,
2016-04-22 18:35:48 +00:00
mergeConfig,
merge,
prepMerge,
mergeLocal,
mergeRemote,
commitStaged,
commitMsg,
pushBranch,
updateBranch,
updateBranches,
seekExportContent,
parseUnrelatedHistoriesOption,
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
SyncOptions(..),
) where
import Command
import qualified Annex
import qualified Annex.Branch
import qualified Remote
import qualified Types.Remote as Remote
import Annex.Hook
2011-12-14 19:56:11 +00:00
import qualified Git.Command
import qualified Git.LsFiles as LsFiles
import qualified Git.Branch
import qualified Git.Merge
import qualified Git.Types as Git
import qualified Git.Ref
import qualified Git
import Git.FilePath
import qualified Remote.Git
import Config
import Config.GitConfig
import Annex.SpecialRemote.Config
import Config.DynamicConfig
import Annex.Path
import Annex.Wanted
import Annex.Content
import Annex.WorkTree
import Command.Get (getKey')
import qualified Command.Move
import qualified Command.Export
import qualified Command.Import
import Annex.Drop
import Annex.UUID
import Logs.UUID
import Logs.Export
import Logs.PreferredContent
import Logs.View
import Annex.AutoMerge
import Annex.AdjustedBranch
import Annex.AdjustedBranch.Merge
import Annex.View
import Annex.Ssh
import Annex.BloomFilter
import Annex.UpdateInstead
import Annex.Export
import Annex.TaggedPush
import Annex.CurrentBranch
add thirdPartyPopulated interface This is to support, eg a borg repo as a special remote, which is populated not by running git-annex commands, but by using borg. Then git-annex sync lists the content of the remote, learns which files are annex objects, and treats those as present in the remote. So, most of the import machinery is reused, to a new purpose. While normally importtree maintains a remote tracking branch, this does not, because the files stored in the remote are annex object files, not user-visible filenames. But, internally, a git tree is still generated, of the files on the remote that are annex objects. This tree is used by retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier, etc. As with other import/export remotes, that the tree is recorded in the export log, and gets grafted into the git-annex branch. importKey changed to be able to return Nothing, to indicate when an ImportLocation is not an annex object and so should be skipped from being included in the tree. It did not seem to make sense to have git-annex import do this, since from the user's perspective, it's not like other imports. So only git-annex sync does it. Note that, git-annex sync does not yet download objects from such remotes that are preferred content. importKeys is run with content downloading disabled, to avoid getting the content of all objects. Perhaps what's needed is for seekSyncContent to be run with these remotes, but I don't know if it will just work (in particular, it needs to avoid trying to transfer objects to them), so I skipped that for now. (Untested and unused as of yet.) This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
2020-12-18 18:52:57 +00:00
import Annex.Import
import Annex.CheckIgnore
import Types.FileMatcher
import qualified Database.Export as Export
import Utility.Bloom
import Utility.OptParse
import Utility.Process.Transcript
import Utility.Tuple
import Control.Concurrent.MVar
import qualified Data.Map as M
import qualified Data.ByteString as S
import Data.Char
cmd :: Command
cmd = withAnnexOptions [jobsOption, backendOption] $
command "sync" SectionCommon
"synchronize local repository with remotes"
(paramRepeating paramRemote) (seek <--< optParser)
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
data SyncOptions = SyncOptions
{ syncWith :: CmdParams
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
, onlyAnnexOption :: Bool
, notOnlyAnnexOption :: Bool
, commitOption :: Bool
, noCommitOption :: Bool
, messageOption :: Maybe String
, pullOption :: Bool
, pushOption :: Bool
, contentOption :: Bool
, noContentOption :: Bool
, contentOfOption :: [FilePath]
, cleanupOption :: Bool
, keyOptions :: Maybe KeyOptions
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
, resolveMergeOverride :: Bool
, allowUnrelatedHistories :: Bool
}
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
instance Default SyncOptions where
def = SyncOptions
{ syncWith = []
, onlyAnnexOption = False
, notOnlyAnnexOption = False
, commitOption = False
, noCommitOption = False
, messageOption = Nothing
, pullOption = False
, pushOption = False
, contentOption = False
, noContentOption = False
, contentOfOption = []
, cleanupOption = False
, keyOptions = Nothing
, resolveMergeOverride = False
, allowUnrelatedHistories = False
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
}
optParser :: CmdParamsDesc -> Parser SyncOptions
optParser desc = SyncOptions
<$> (many $ argument str
( metavar desc
<> completeRemotes
))
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<*> switch
( long "only-annex"
<> short 'a'
<> help "only sync git-annex branch and annexed file contents"
)
<*> switch
( long "not-only-annex"
<> help "sync git branches as well as annex"
)
<*> switch
( long "commit"
<> help "commit changes to git"
)
<*> switch
( long "no-commit"
<> help "avoid git commit"
)
<*> optional (strOption
( long "message" <> short 'm' <> metavar "MSG"
<> help "commit message"
))
<*> invertableSwitch "pull" True
( help "avoid git pulls from remotes"
)
<*> invertableSwitch "push" True
( help "avoid git pushes to remotes"
)
<*> switch
( long "content"
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<> help "transfer annexed file contents"
)
<*> switch
( long "no-content"
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<> help "do not transfer annexed file contents"
)
<*> many (strOption
( long "content-of"
<> short 'C'
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<> help "transfer contents of annexed files in a given location"
<> metavar paramPath
))
<*> switch
( long "cleanup"
<> help "remove synced/ branches from previous sync"
)
<*> optional parseAllOption
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<*> invertableSwitch "resolvemerge" True
( help "do not automatically resolve merge conflicts"
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
)
<*> parseUnrelatedHistoriesOption
parseUnrelatedHistoriesOption :: Parser Bool
parseUnrelatedHistoriesOption =
invertableSwitch "allow-unrelated-histories" False
( help "allow merging unrelated histories"
)
-- Since prepMerge changes the working directory, FilePath options
-- have to be adjusted.
instance DeferredParseClass SyncOptions where
finishParse v = SyncOptions
<$> pure (syncWith v)
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
<*> pure (onlyAnnexOption v)
<*> pure (notOnlyAnnexOption v)
<*> pure (commitOption v)
<*> pure (noCommitOption v)
<*> pure (messageOption v)
<*> pure (pullOption v)
<*> pure (pushOption v)
<*> pure (contentOption v)
<*> pure (noContentOption v)
<*> liftIO (mapM (fromRawFilePath <$$> absPath . toRawFilePath) (contentOfOption v))
<*> pure (cleanupOption v)
<*> pure (keyOptions v)
<*> pure (resolveMergeOverride v)
<*> pure (allowUnrelatedHistories v)
seek :: SyncOptions -> CommandSeek
seek o = do
prepMerge
startConcurrency transferStages (seek' o)
seek' :: SyncOptions -> CommandSeek
seek' o = do
let withbranch a = a =<< getCurrentBranch
remotes <- syncRemotes (syncWith o)
-- Remotes that are git repositories, not (necesarily) special remotes.
let gitremotes = filter (Remote.gitSyncableRemoteType . Remote.remotetype) remotes
-- Remotes that contain annex object content.
contentremotes <- filter (\r -> Remote.uuid r /= NoUUID)
<$> filterM (not <$$> liftIO . getDynamicConfig . remoteAnnexIgnore . Remote.gitconfig) remotes
if cleanupOption o
then do
commandAction (withbranch cleanupLocal)
mapM_ (commandAction . withbranch . cleanupRemote) gitremotes
else do
mc <- mergeConfig (allowUnrelatedHistories o)
-- Syncing involves many actions, any of which
-- can independently fail, without preventing
-- the others from running.
-- These actions cannot be run concurrently.
mapM_ includeCommandAction $ concat
[ [ commit o ]
, [ withbranch (mergeLocal mc o) ]
, map (withbranch . pullRemote o mc) gitremotes
, [ mergeAnnex ]
]
content <- shouldSyncContent o
forM_ (filter isImport contentremotes) $
withbranch . importRemote content o
forM_ (filter isThirdPartyPopulated contentremotes) $
pullThirdPartyPopulated o
when content $ do
-- Send content to any exports before other
-- repositories, in case that lets content
-- be dropped from other repositories.
exportedcontent <- withbranch $
seekExportContent (Just o)
(filter isExport contentremotes)
-- Sync content with remotes, but not with
-- export or import remotes, which handle content
-- syncing as part of export and import.
syncedcontent <- withbranch $
seekSyncContent o $ filter
(\r -> not (isExport r || isImport r))
contentremotes
-- Transferring content can take a while,
-- and other changes can be pushed to the
-- git-annex branch on the remotes in the
-- meantime, so pull and merge again to
-- avoid our push overwriting those changes.
when (syncedcontent || exportedcontent) $ do
mapM_ includeCommandAction $ concat
[ map (withbranch . pullRemote o mc) gitremotes
, [ commitAnnex, mergeAnnex ]
]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
void $ includeCommandAction $ withbranch $ pushLocal o
-- Pushes to remotes can run concurrently.
mapM_ (commandAction . withbranch . pushRemote o) gitremotes
{- Merging may delete the current directory, so go to the top
- of the repo. This also means that sync always acts on all files in the
- repository, not just on a subdirectory. -}
prepMerge :: Annex ()
prepMerge = Annex.changeDirectory . fromRawFilePath =<< fromRepo Git.repoPath
mergeConfig :: Bool -> Annex [Git.Merge.MergeConfig]
mergeConfig mergeunrelated = do
quiet <- commandProgressDisabled
return $ catMaybes
[ Just Git.Merge.MergeNonInteractive
, if mergeunrelated
then Just Git.Merge.MergeUnrelatedHistories
else Nothing
, if quiet
then Just Git.Merge.MergeQuiet
else Nothing
]
2016-04-22 18:35:48 +00:00
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
merge :: CurrBranch -> [Git.Merge.MergeConfig] -> SyncOptions -> Git.Branch.CommitMode -> Git.Branch -> Annex Bool
merge currbranch mergeconfig o commitmode tomerge = do
canresolvemerge <- if resolveMergeOverride o
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
then getGitConfigVal annexResolveMerge
else return False
case currbranch of
(Just b, Just adj) -> mergeToAdjustedBranch tomerge (b, adj) mergeconfig canresolvemerge commitmode
(b, _) -> autoMergeFrom tomerge b mergeconfig commitmode canresolvemerge
syncBranch :: Git.Branch -> Git.Branch
syncBranch = Git.Ref.underBase "refs/heads/synced" . origBranch
origBranch :: Git.Branch -> Git.Branch
origBranch = fromViewBranch . fromAdjustedBranch
2011-12-31 08:11:39 +00:00
remoteBranch :: Remote -> Git.Ref -> Git.Ref
remoteBranch remote = Git.Ref.underBase $ "refs/remotes/" ++ Remote.name remote
2011-12-31 07:01:18 +00:00
2015-10-15 19:10:14 +00:00
-- Do automatic initialization of remotes when possible when getting remote
-- list.
2011-12-31 08:11:39 +00:00
syncRemotes :: [String] -> Annex [Remote]
syncRemotes ps = do
remotelist <- Remote.remoteList' True
available <- filterM (liftIO . getDynamicConfig . remoteAnnexSync . Remote.gitconfig) remotelist
syncRemotes' ps available
syncRemotes' :: [String] -> [Remote] -> Annex [Remote]
syncRemotes' ps available =
ifM (Annex.getRead Annex.fast) ( fastest <$> wanted , wanted )
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
where
wanted
| null ps = filterM good (concat $ Remote.byCost available)
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
| otherwise = listed
listed = concat <$> mapM Remote.byNameOrGroup ps
good r
| Remote.gitSyncableRemoteType (Remote.remotetype r) =
Remote.Git.repoAvail =<< Remote.getRepo r
| otherwise = return True
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
fastest = fromMaybe [] . headMaybe . Remote.byCost
commit :: SyncOptions -> CommandStart
commit o = stopUnless shouldcommit $ starting "commit" ai si $ do
commitmessage <- maybe commitMsg return (messageOption o)
Annex.Branch.commit =<< Annex.Branch.commitMessage
next $ do
showOutput
let cmode = Git.Branch.ManualCommit
cquiet <- Git.Branch.CommitQuiet <$> commandProgressDisabled
void $ inRepo $ Git.Branch.commitCommand cmode cquiet
[ Param "-a"
, Param "-m"
, Param commitmessage
]
return True
where
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
shouldcommit = notOnlyAnnex o <&&>
( pure (commitOption o)
<||> (pure (not (noCommitOption o)) <&&> getGitConfigVal annexAutoCommit)
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
)
ai = ActionItemOther Nothing
si = SeekInput []
commitMsg :: Annex String
commitMsg = do
u <- getUUID
m <- uuidDescMap
return $ "git-annex in " ++ maybe "unknown" fromUUIDDesc (M.lookup u m)
commitStaged :: Git.Branch.CommitMode -> String -> Annex Bool
commitStaged commitmode commitmessage = do
runAnnexHook preCommitAnnexHook
mb <- inRepo Git.Branch.currentUnsafe
let (getparent, branch) = case mb of
Just b -> (Git.Ref.sha b, b)
Nothing -> (Git.Ref.headSha, Git.Ref.headRef)
parents <- maybeToList <$> inRepo getparent
void $ inRepo $ Git.Branch.commit commitmode False commitmessage branch parents
return True
2011-12-10 16:21:22 +00:00
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
mergeLocal :: [Git.Merge.MergeConfig] -> SyncOptions -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
mergeLocal mergeconfig o currbranch = stopUnless (notOnlyAnnex o) $
mergeLocal' mergeconfig o currbranch
mergeLocal' :: [Git.Merge.MergeConfig] -> SyncOptions -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
mergeLocal' mergeconfig o currbranch@(Just branch, _) =
needMerge currbranch branch >>= \case
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
Nothing -> stop
Just syncbranch -> do
let ai = ActionItemOther (Just $ UnquotedString $ Git.Ref.describe syncbranch)
let si = SeekInput []
starting "merge" ai si $
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
next $ merge currbranch mergeconfig o Git.Branch.ManualCommit syncbranch
mergeLocal' _ _ currbranch@(Nothing, _) = inRepo Git.Branch.currentUnsafe >>= \case
Just branch -> needMerge currbranch branch >>= \case
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
Nothing -> stop
Just syncbranch -> do
let ai = ActionItemOther (Just $ UnquotedString $ Git.Ref.describe syncbranch)
let si = SeekInput []
starting "merge" ai si $ do
warning $ UnquotedString $ "There are no commits yet to branch " ++ Git.fromRef branch ++ ", so cannot merge " ++ Git.fromRef syncbranch ++ " into it."
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
next $ return False
Nothing -> stop
-- Returns the branch that should be merged, if any.
needMerge :: CurrBranch -> Git.Branch -> Annex (Maybe Git.Branch)
needMerge currbranch headbranch
| is_branchView headbranch = return Nothing
| otherwise =
ifM (allM id checks)
( return (Just syncbranch)
, return Nothing
)
where
syncbranch = syncBranch headbranch
checks = case currbranch of
(Just _, madj) ->
let branch' = maybe headbranch (adjBranch . originalToAdjusted headbranch) madj
in
[ not <$> isBareRepo
, inRepo (Git.Ref.exists syncbranch)
, inRepo (Git.Branch.changed branch' syncbranch)
]
(Nothing, _) ->
[ not <$> isBareRepo
, inRepo (Git.Ref.exists syncbranch)
]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
pushLocal :: SyncOptions -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
pushLocal o b = stopUnless (notOnlyAnnex o) $ do
updateBranches b
stop
updateBranches :: CurrBranch -> Annex ()
updateBranches (Nothing, _) = noop
updateBranches (Just branch, madj) = do
-- When in a view branch, update it to reflect any changes
-- of its parent branch or the metadata.
currentView >>= \case
Just (view, madj') -> updateView view madj' >>= \case
Nothing -> noop
Just newcommit -> do
ok <- inRepo $ Git.Command.runBool
[ Param "merge"
, Param (Git.fromRef newcommit)
]
unless ok $
giveup $ "failed to update view"
case madj' of
Nothing -> noop
Just adj -> updateadjustedbranch adj
2023-03-14 02:39:16 +00:00
-- When in an adjusted branch, propagate any changes
-- made to it back to the original branch.
Nothing -> case madj of
Just adj -> do
propigateAdjustedCommits branch adj
updateadjustedbranch adj
Nothing -> noop
-- Update the sync branch to match the new state of the branch
inRepo $ updateBranch (syncBranch branch) (fromViewBranch branch)
where
-- The adjusted branch may also need to be updated, if the adjustment
-- is not stable, and the usual configuration does not update it.
updateadjustedbranch adj = unless (adjustmentIsStable adj) $
annexAdjustedBranchRefresh <$> Annex.getGitConfig >>= \case
0 -> adjustedBranchRefreshFull adj branch
_ -> return ()
updateBranch :: Git.Branch -> Git.Branch -> Git.Repo -> IO ()
updateBranch syncbranch updateto g =
unlessM go $
giveup $ "failed to update " ++ Git.fromRef syncbranch
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
where
go = Git.Command.runBool
[ Param "branch"
, Param "-f"
, Param $ Git.fromRef $ Git.Ref.base syncbranch
, Param $ Git.fromRef $ updateto
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
] g
2011-12-30 21:38:38 +00:00
pullRemote :: SyncOptions -> [Git.Merge.MergeConfig] -> Remote -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
pullRemote o mergeconfig remote branch = stopUnless (pure $ pullOption o && wantpull) $
starting "pull" ai si $ do
2011-12-30 21:38:38 +00:00
showOutput
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
ifM (onlyAnnex o)
( do
void $ fetch $ map Git.fromRef
[ Annex.Branch.name
, syncBranch $ Annex.Branch.name
]
next $ return True
, ifM (fetch [])
( next $ mergeRemote remote branch mergeconfig o
, next $ return True
)
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
)
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
where
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
fetch bs = do
repo <- Remote.getRepo remote
ms <- Annex.getState Annex.output
inRepoWithSshOptionsTo repo (Remote.gitconfig remote) $
Git.Command.runBool $ catMaybes
[ Just $ Param "fetch"
, if commandProgressDisabled' ms
then Just $ Param "--quiet"
else Nothing
, Just $ Param $ Remote.name remote
] ++ map Param bs
wantpull = remoteAnnexPull (Remote.gitconfig remote)
ai = ActionItemOther (Just (UnquotedString (Remote.name remote)))
si = SeekInput []
importRemote :: Bool -> SyncOptions -> Remote -> CurrBranch -> CommandSeek
importRemote importcontent o remote currbranch
| not (pullOption o) || not wantpull = noop
| otherwise = case remoteAnnexTrackingBranch (Remote.gitconfig remote) of
Nothing -> noop
Just b -> do
let (branch, subdir) = splitRemoteAnnexTrackingBranchSubdir b
if canImportKeys remote importcontent
then do
Command.Import.seekRemote remote branch subdir importcontent (CheckGitIgnore True)
-- Importing generates a branch
-- that is not initially connected
-- to the current branch, so allow
-- merging unrelated histories when
-- mergeing it.
mc <- mergeConfig True
void $ mergeRemote remote currbranch mc o
else warning $ UnquotedString $ "Cannot import from " ++ Remote.name remote ++ " when not syncing content."
where
wantpull = remoteAnnexPull (Remote.gitconfig remote)
{- Handle a remote that is populated by a third party, by listing
add thirdPartyPopulated interface This is to support, eg a borg repo as a special remote, which is populated not by running git-annex commands, but by using borg. Then git-annex sync lists the content of the remote, learns which files are annex objects, and treats those as present in the remote. So, most of the import machinery is reused, to a new purpose. While normally importtree maintains a remote tracking branch, this does not, because the files stored in the remote are annex object files, not user-visible filenames. But, internally, a git tree is still generated, of the files on the remote that are annex objects. This tree is used by retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier, etc. As with other import/export remotes, that the tree is recorded in the export log, and gets grafted into the git-annex branch. importKey changed to be able to return Nothing, to indicate when an ImportLocation is not an annex object and so should be skipped from being included in the tree. It did not seem to make sense to have git-annex import do this, since from the user's perspective, it's not like other imports. So only git-annex sync does it. Note that, git-annex sync does not yet download objects from such remotes that are preferred content. importKeys is run with content downloading disabled, to avoid getting the content of all objects. Perhaps what's needed is for seekSyncContent to be run with these remotes, but I don't know if it will just work (in particular, it needs to avoid trying to transfer objects to them), so I skipped that for now. (Untested and unused as of yet.) This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
2020-12-18 18:52:57 +00:00
- the contents of the remote, and then adding only the files on it that
- importKey identifies to a tree. The tree is only used to keep track
- of where keys are located on the remote, no remote tracking branch is
- updated, because the filenames are the names of annex object files,
- not suitable for a tracking branch. Does not transfer any content. -}
pullThirdPartyPopulated :: SyncOptions -> Remote -> CommandSeek
pullThirdPartyPopulated o remote
| not (pullOption o) || not wantpull = noop
| not (canImportKeys remote False) = noop
| otherwise = void $ includeCommandAction $ starting "list" ai si $
Command.Import.listContents' remote ImportTree (CheckGitIgnore False) go
add thirdPartyPopulated interface This is to support, eg a borg repo as a special remote, which is populated not by running git-annex commands, but by using borg. Then git-annex sync lists the content of the remote, learns which files are annex objects, and treats those as present in the remote. So, most of the import machinery is reused, to a new purpose. While normally importtree maintains a remote tracking branch, this does not, because the files stored in the remote are annex object files, not user-visible filenames. But, internally, a git tree is still generated, of the files on the remote that are annex objects. This tree is used by retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier, etc. As with other import/export remotes, that the tree is recorded in the export log, and gets grafted into the git-annex branch. importKey changed to be able to return Nothing, to indicate when an ImportLocation is not an annex object and so should be skipped from being included in the tree. It did not seem to make sense to have git-annex import do this, since from the user's perspective, it's not like other imports. So only git-annex sync does it. Note that, git-annex sync does not yet download objects from such remotes that are preferred content. importKeys is run with content downloading disabled, to avoid getting the content of all objects. Perhaps what's needed is for seekSyncContent to be run with these remotes, but I don't know if it will just work (in particular, it needs to avoid trying to transfer objects to them), so I skipped that for now. (Untested and unused as of yet.) This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
2020-12-18 18:52:57 +00:00
where
go (Just importable) = importKeys remote ImportTree False True importable >>= \case
Just importablekeys -> do
(_imported, updatestate) <- recordImportTree remote ImportTree importablekeys
next $ do
updatestate
return True
Nothing -> next $ return False
go Nothing = next $ return True -- unchanged from before
ai = ActionItemOther (Just (UnquotedString (Remote.name remote)))
add thirdPartyPopulated interface This is to support, eg a borg repo as a special remote, which is populated not by running git-annex commands, but by using borg. Then git-annex sync lists the content of the remote, learns which files are annex objects, and treats those as present in the remote. So, most of the import machinery is reused, to a new purpose. While normally importtree maintains a remote tracking branch, this does not, because the files stored in the remote are annex object files, not user-visible filenames. But, internally, a git tree is still generated, of the files on the remote that are annex objects. This tree is used by retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier, etc. As with other import/export remotes, that the tree is recorded in the export log, and gets grafted into the git-annex branch. importKey changed to be able to return Nothing, to indicate when an ImportLocation is not an annex object and so should be skipped from being included in the tree. It did not seem to make sense to have git-annex import do this, since from the user's perspective, it's not like other imports. So only git-annex sync does it. Note that, git-annex sync does not yet download objects from such remotes that are preferred content. importKeys is run with content downloading disabled, to avoid getting the content of all objects. Perhaps what's needed is for seekSyncContent to be run with these remotes, but I don't know if it will just work (in particular, it needs to avoid trying to transfer objects to them), so I skipped that for now. (Untested and unused as of yet.) This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
2020-12-18 18:52:57 +00:00
si = SeekInput []
wantpull = remoteAnnexPull (Remote.gitconfig remote)
add thirdPartyPopulated interface This is to support, eg a borg repo as a special remote, which is populated not by running git-annex commands, but by using borg. Then git-annex sync lists the content of the remote, learns which files are annex objects, and treats those as present in the remote. So, most of the import machinery is reused, to a new purpose. While normally importtree maintains a remote tracking branch, this does not, because the files stored in the remote are annex object files, not user-visible filenames. But, internally, a git tree is still generated, of the files on the remote that are annex objects. This tree is used by retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier, etc. As with other import/export remotes, that the tree is recorded in the export log, and gets grafted into the git-annex branch. importKey changed to be able to return Nothing, to indicate when an ImportLocation is not an annex object and so should be skipped from being included in the tree. It did not seem to make sense to have git-annex import do this, since from the user's perspective, it's not like other imports. So only git-annex sync does it. Note that, git-annex sync does not yet download objects from such remotes that are preferred content. importKeys is run with content downloading disabled, to avoid getting the content of all objects. Perhaps what's needed is for seekSyncContent to be run with these remotes, but I don't know if it will just work (in particular, it needs to avoid trying to transfer objects to them), so I skipped that for now. (Untested and unused as of yet.) This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
2020-12-18 18:52:57 +00:00
{- The remote probably has both a master and a synced/master branch.
- Which to merge from? Well, the master has whatever latest changes
- were committed (or pushed changes, if this is a bare remote),
- while the synced/master may have changes that some
- other remote synced to this remote. So, merge them both. -}
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
mergeRemote :: Remote -> CurrBranch -> [Git.Merge.MergeConfig] -> SyncOptions -> CommandCleanup
mergeRemote remote currbranch mergeconfig o = ifM isBareRepo
( return True
, case currbranch of
(Nothing, _) -> do
branch <- inRepo Git.Branch.currentUnsafe
mergelisted (pure (branchlist branch))
(Just branch, _) -> do
inRepo $ updateBranch (syncBranch branch) branch
mergelisted (tomerge (branchlist (Just branch)))
)
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
where
mergelisted getlist = and <$>
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
(mapM (merge currbranch mergeconfig o Git.Branch.ManualCommit . remoteBranch remote) =<< getlist)
tomerge = filterM (changed remote)
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
branchlist Nothing = []
branchlist (Just branch)
| is_branchView branch = []
| otherwise = [origBranch branch, syncBranch branch]
pushRemote :: SyncOptions -> Remote -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
pushRemote _o _remote (Nothing, _) = stop
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
pushRemote o remote (Just branch, _) = do
onlyannex <- onlyAnnex o
let mainbranch = if onlyannex then Nothing else Just branch
stopUnless (pure (pushOption o) <&&> needpush mainbranch) $
starting "push" ai si $ next $ do
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
repo <- Remote.getRepo remote
showOutput
ms <- Annex.getState Annex.output
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
ok <- inRepoWithSshOptionsTo repo gc $
pushBranch remote mainbranch ms
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
if ok
then postpushupdate repo
else do
warning $ UnquotedString $ unwords [ "Pushing to " ++ Remote.name remote ++ " failed." ]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
return ok
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
where
ai = ActionItemOther (Just (UnquotedString (Remote.name remote)))
si = SeekInput []
gc = Remote.gitconfig remote
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
needpush mainbranch
| remoteAnnexReadOnly gc = return False
| not (remoteAnnexPush gc) = return False
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
| otherwise = anyM (newer remote) $ catMaybes
[ syncBranch <$> mainbranch
, Just (Annex.Branch.name)
]
-- Older remotes on crippled filesystems may not have a
-- post-receive hook set up, so when updateInstead emulation
-- is needed, run post-receive manually.
postpushupdate repo = case Git.repoWorkTree repo of
Nothing -> return True
Just wt -> ifM needemulation
( gitAnnexChildProcess "post-receive" []
(\cp -> cp { cwd = Just (fromRawFilePath wt) })
(\_ _ _ pid -> waitForProcess pid >>= return . \case
ExitSuccess -> True
_ -> False
)
, return True
)
where
needemulation = Remote.Git.onLocalRepo repo $
(annexCrippledFileSystem <$> Annex.getGitConfig)
<&&>
needUpdateInsteadEmulation
{- Pushes a regular branch like master to a remote. Also pushes the git-annex
- branch.
-
- If the remote is a bare git repository, it's best to push the regular
- branch directly to it, so that cloning/pulling will get it.
- On the other hand, if it's not bare, pushing to the checked out branch
- will generally fail (except with receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead),
- and this is why we push to its syncBranch.
-
- Git offers no way to tell if a remote is bare or not, so both methods
- are tried.
-
- The direct push is likely to spew an ugly error message, so its stderr is
- often elided. Since git progress display goes to stderr too, the
- sync push is done first, and actually sends the data. Then the
- direct push is tried, with stderr discarded, to update the branch ref
- on the remote.
-
- The sync push first sends the synced/master branch,
- and then forces the update of the remote synced/git-annex branch.
-
- Since some providers like github may treat the first branch sent
- as the default branch, it's better to make that be synced/master than
- synced/git-annex. (Although neither is ideal, it's the best that
- can be managed given the constraints on order.)
-
- The forcing is necessary if a transition has rewritten the git-annex branch.
- Normally any changes to the git-annex branch get pulled and merged before
- this push, so this forcing is unlikely to overwrite new data pushed
- in from another repository that is also syncing.
-
- But overwriting of data on synced/git-annex can happen, in a race.
- The only difference caused by using a forced push in that case is that
- the last repository to push wins the race, rather than the first to push.
-}
pushBranch :: Remote -> Maybe Git.Branch -> MessageState -> Git.Repo -> IO Bool
pushBranch remote mbranch ms g = directpush `after` annexpush `after` syncpush
where
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
syncpush = flip Git.Command.runBool g $ pushparams $ catMaybes
[ (refspec . origBranch) <$> mbranch
, Just $ Git.Branch.forcePush $ refspec Annex.Branch.name
]
annexpush = void $ tryIO $ flip Git.Command.runQuiet g $ pushparams
[ Git.fromRef $ Git.Ref.base $ Annex.Branch.name ]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
directpush = case mbranch of
Nothing -> noop
-- Git prints out an error message when this fails.
-- In the default configuration of receive.denyCurrentBranch,
-- the error message mentions that config setting
-- (and should even if it is localized), and is quite long,
-- and the user was not intending to update the checked out
-- branch, so in that case, avoid displaying the error
-- message. Do display other error messages though,
-- including the error displayed when
-- receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead -- the user
-- will want to see that one.
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
Just branch -> do
let p = flip Git.Command.gitCreateProcess g $ pushparams
[ Git.fromRef $ Git.Ref.base $ origBranch branch ]
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
(transcript, ok) <- processTranscript' p Nothing
when (not ok && not ("denyCurrentBranch" `isInfixOf` transcript)) $
hPutStr stderr transcript
pushparams branches = catMaybes
[ Just $ Param "push"
, if commandProgressDisabled' ms
then Just $ Param "--quiet"
else Nothing
, Just $ Param $ Remote.name remote
] ++ map Param branches
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
refspec b = concat
[ Git.fromRef $ Git.Ref.base b
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
, ":"
, Git.fromRef $ Git.Ref.base $ syncBranch b
2012-11-12 05:05:04 +00:00
]
commitAnnex :: CommandStart
commitAnnex = do
Annex.Branch.commit =<< Annex.Branch.commitMessage
stop
mergeAnnex :: CommandStart
2011-12-30 21:38:38 +00:00
mergeAnnex = do
2013-09-25 07:09:06 +00:00
void Annex.Branch.forceUpdate
2011-12-30 21:38:38 +00:00
stop
2011-12-31 06:18:16 +00:00
2011-12-31 08:11:39 +00:00
changed :: Remote -> Git.Ref -> Annex Bool
2011-12-31 07:01:18 +00:00
changed remote b = do
let r = remoteBranch remote b
ifM (inRepo $ Git.Ref.exists r)
( inRepo $ Git.Branch.changed b r
, return False
)
2011-12-31 07:01:18 +00:00
2011-12-31 08:11:39 +00:00
newer :: Remote -> Git.Ref -> Annex Bool
2011-12-31 07:01:18 +00:00
newer remote b = do
let r = remoteBranch remote b
ifM (inRepo $ Git.Ref.exists r)
( inRepo $ Git.Branch.changed r b
, return True
)
{- Without --all, only looks at files in the work tree.
2023-03-14 02:39:16 +00:00
- (Or, when in an adjusted branch where some files are hidden, at files in
- the original branch.)
-
- With --all, when preferred content expressions look at filenames,
- makes a first pass over the files in the work tree so those preferred
- content expressions will match. The second pass is over all keys,
- and only preferred content expressions that don't look at filenames
- will match.
-
- Returns true if any file transfers were made.
-
- When concurrency is enabled, files are processed concurrently.
-}
seekSyncContent :: SyncOptions -> [Remote] -> CurrBranch -> Annex Bool
seekSyncContent _ [] _ = return False
seekSyncContent o rs currbranch = do
mvar <- liftIO newEmptyMVar
bloom <- case keyOptions o of
Just WantAllKeys -> ifM preferredcontentmatchesfilenames
( Just <$> genBloomFilter (seekworktree mvar (WorkTreeItems []))
2020-09-24 19:37:39 +00:00
, pure Nothing
)
_ -> case currbranch of
(Just origbranch, Just adj) | adjustmentHidesFiles adj -> do
l <- workTreeItems' (AllowHidden True) ww (contentOfOption o)
seekincludinghidden origbranch mvar l (const noop)
pure Nothing
_ -> do
l <- workTreeItems ww (contentOfOption o)
seekworktree mvar l (const noop)
pure Nothing
waitForAllRunningCommandActions
withKeyOptions' (keyOptions o) False
(return (const (commandAction . gokey mvar bloom)))
(const noop)
(WorkTreeItems [])
waitForAllRunningCommandActions
liftIO $ not <$> isEmptyMVar mvar
where
seekworktree mvar l bloomfeeder = do
let seeker = AnnexedFileSeeker
{ startAction = gofile bloomfeeder mvar
, checkContentPresent = Nothing
, usesLocationLog = True
}
seekFilteredKeys seeker $
seekHelper fst3 ww LsFiles.inRepoDetails l
seekincludinghidden origbranch mvar l bloomfeeder =
let filterer = \(si, f) -> lookupKey f >>= \case
Just k -> (commandAction $ gofile bloomfeeder mvar si f k)
Nothing -> noop
in seekFiltered (const (pure True)) filterer $
seekHelper id ww (LsFiles.inRepoOrBranch origbranch) l
ww = WarnUnmatchLsFiles
gofile bloom mvar _ f k =
go (Right bloom) mvar (AssociatedFile (Just f)) k
gokey mvar bloom (_, k, _) =
go (Left bloom) mvar (AssociatedFile Nothing) k
go ebloom mvar af k = do
let ai = OnlyActionOn k (ActionItemKey k)
startingNoMessage ai $ do
whenM (syncFile ebloom rs af k) $
void $ liftIO $ tryPutMVar mvar ()
next $ return True
preferredcontentmatchesfilenames =
preferredcontentmatchesfilenames' Nothing
<||> anyM (preferredcontentmatchesfilenames' . Just . Remote.uuid) rs
preferredcontentmatchesfilenames' =
introspectPreferredRequiredContent matchNeedsFileName
2015-06-16 23:07:14 +00:00
{- If it's preferred content, and we don't have it, get it from one of the
- listed remotes (preferring the cheaper earlier ones).
-
- Send it to each remote that doesn't have it, and for which it's
- preferred content.
-
- Drop it locally if it's not preferred content (honoring numcopies).
-
- Drop it from each remote that has it, where it's not preferred content
- (honoring numcopies).
-
- Returns True if any file transfers were made.
2015-06-16 23:07:14 +00:00
-}
syncFile :: Either (Maybe (Bloom Key)) (Key -> Annex ()) -> [Remote] -> AssociatedFile -> Key -> Annex Bool
syncFile ebloom rs af k = do
inhere <- inAnnex k
locs <- map Remote.uuid <$> Remote.keyPossibilities k
let (have, lack) = partition (\r -> Remote.uuid r `elem` locs) rs
got <- anyM id =<< handleget have inhere
let inhere' = inhere || got
putrs <- handleput lack inhere'
u <- getUUID
let locs' = concat [if inhere' then [u] else [], putrs, locs]
-- To handle --all, a bloom filter is populated with all the keys
-- of files in the working tree in the first pass. On the second
-- pass, avoid dropping keys that were seen in the first pass, which
-- would happen otherwise when preferred content matches on the
-- filename, which is not available in the second pass.
-- (When the preferred content expressions do not match on
-- filenames, the first pass is skipped for speed.)
--
-- When there's a false positive in the bloom filter, the result
-- is keeping a key that preferred content doesn't really want.
seenbloom <- case ebloom of
Left Nothing -> pure False
Left (Just bloom) -> pure (elemB k bloom)
Right bloomfeeder -> bloomfeeder k >> return False
unless seenbloom $
-- Using callCommandAction rather than
-- includeCommandAction for drops,
-- because a failure to drop does not mean
-- the sync failed.
handleDropsFrom locs' rs "unwanted" True k af si []
callCommandAction
return (got || not (null putrs))
where
wantget have inhere = allM id
[ pure (not $ null have)
, pure (not inhere)
2015-06-16 19:07:03 +00:00
, wantGet True (Just k) af
]
handleget have inhere = ifM (wantget have inhere)
( return [ get have ]
, return []
)
get have = includeCommandAction $ starting "get" ai si $
stopUnless (getKey' k af have) $
next $ return True
wantput r
| Remote.readonly r || remoteAnnexReadOnly (Remote.gitconfig r) = return False
| isThirdPartyPopulated r = return False
| otherwise = wantGetBy True (Just k) af (Remote.uuid r)
handleput lack inhere
| inhere = catMaybes <$>
( forM lack $ \r ->
ifM (wantput r <&&> put r)
( return (Just (Remote.uuid r))
, return Nothing
)
)
| otherwise = return []
2016-03-09 19:04:00 +00:00
put dest = includeCommandAction $
Command.Move.toStart' dest Command.Move.RemoveNever af k ai si
2019-06-06 16:53:24 +00:00
ai = mkActionItem (k, af)
si = SeekInput []
{- When a remote has an annex-tracking-branch configuration, and that branch
- is currently checked out, change the export to contain the current content
- of the branch. (If the branch is not currently checked out, anything
- imported from the remote will not yet have been merged into it yet and
- so exporting would delete files from the remote unexpectedly.)
-
- Otherwise, transfer any files that were part of a previous export
- but are not in the remote yet.
-
- Returns True if any file transfers were made.
-}
seekExportContent :: Maybe SyncOptions -> [Remote] -> CurrBranch -> Annex Bool
seekExportContent o rs (currbranch, _) = or <$> forM rs go
where
go r
| not (maybe True pullOption o) = return False
| not (remoteAnnexPush (Remote.gitconfig r)) = return False
| otherwise = bracket
(Export.openDb (Remote.uuid r))
Export.closeDb
(\db -> Export.writeLockDbWhile db (go' r db))
go' r db = case remoteAnnexTrackingBranch (Remote.gitconfig r) of
Nothing -> cannotupdateexport r db Nothing True
Just b -> do
mtree <- inRepo $ Git.Ref.tree b
let addsubdir = case snd (splitRemoteAnnexTrackingBranchSubdir b) of
Just subdir -> \cb -> Git.Ref $
Git.fromRef' cb <> ":" <> getTopFilePath subdir
Nothing -> id
mcurrtree <- maybe (pure Nothing)
(inRepo . Git.Ref.tree . addsubdir)
currbranch
mtbcommitsha <- Command.Export.getExportCommit r b
case (mtree, mcurrtree, mtbcommitsha) of
(Just tree, Just currtree, Just _)
| tree == currtree -> do
filteredtree <- Command.Export.filterExport r tree
Command.Export.changeExport r db filteredtree
Command.Export.fillExport r db filteredtree mtbcommitsha
| otherwise -> cannotupdateexport r db (Just b) False
_ -> cannotupdateexport r db (Just b) True
cannotupdateexport r db mtb showwarning = do
exported <- getExport (Remote.uuid r)
when showwarning $
maybe noop (warncannotupdateexport r mtb exported) currbranch
fillexistingexport r db (exportedTreeishes exported) Nothing
warncannotupdateexport r mtb exported currb = case mtb of
Nothing -> inRepo (Git.Ref.tree currb) >>= \case
Just currt | not (any (== currt) (exportedTreeishes exported)) ->
showLongNote $ unwords
[ notupdating
, "to reflect changes to the tree, because export"
, "tracking is not enabled. "
, "(Set " ++ gitconfig ++ " to enable it.)"
]
_ -> noop
Just b -> showLongNote $ unwords
[ notupdating
, "because " ++ Git.fromRef b ++ " does not exist."
, "(As configured by " ++ gitconfig ++ ")"
]
where
gitconfig = show (remoteAnnexConfig r "tracking-branch")
notupdating = "Not updating export to " ++ Remote.name r
fillexistingexport _ _ [] _ = return False
fillexistingexport r db (tree:[]) mtbcommitsha = do
-- The tree was already filtered when it was exported, so
-- does not need be be filtered again now, when we're only
-- filling in any files that did not get transferred
-- to the existing exported tree.
let filteredtree = Command.Export.ExportFiltered tree
Command.Export.fillExport r db filteredtree mtbcommitsha
fillexistingexport r _ _ _ = do
warnExportImportConflict r
return False
cleanupLocal :: CurrBranch -> CommandStart
cleanupLocal (Nothing, _) = stop
cleanupLocal (Just currb, _) = starting "cleanup" ai si $ next $ do
delbranch $ syncBranch currb
delbranch $ syncBranch $ Git.Ref.base $ Annex.Branch.name
mapM_ (\(s,r) -> inRepo $ Git.Ref.delete s r) =<< listTaggedBranches
return True
where
delbranch b = whenM (inRepo $ Git.Ref.exists $ Git.Ref.branchRef b) $
inRepo $ Git.Branch.delete b
ai = ActionItemOther (Just "local")
si = SeekInput []
cleanupRemote :: Remote -> CurrBranch -> CommandStart
cleanupRemote _ (Nothing, _) = stop
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
cleanupRemote remote (Just b, _) =
starting "cleanup" ai si $
make CommandStart return a StartMessage The goal is to be able to run CommandStart in the main thread when -J is used, rather than unncessarily passing it off to a worker thread, which incurs overhead that is signficant when the CommandStart is going to quickly decide to stop. To do that, the message it displays needs to be displayed in the worker thread, after the CommandStart has run. Also, the change will mean that CommandStart will no longer necessarily run with the same Annex state as CommandPerform. While its docs already said it should avoid modifying Annex state, I audited all the CommandStart code as part of the conversion. (Note that CommandSeek already sometimes runs with a different Annex state, and that has not been a source of any problems, so I am not too worried that this change will lead to breakage going forward.) The only modification of Annex state I found was it calling allowMessages in some Commands that default to noMessages. Dealt with that by adding a startCustomOutput and a startingUsualMessages. This lets a command start with noMessages and then select the output it wants for each CommandStart. One bit of breakage: onlyActionOn has been removed from commands that used it. The plan is that, since a StartMessage contains an ActionItem, when a Key can be extracted from that, the parallel job runner can run onlyActionOn' automatically. Then commands won't need to worry about this detail. Future work. Otherwise, this was a fairly straightforward process of making each CommandStart compile again. Hopefully other behavior changes were mostly avoided. In a few cases, a command had a CommandStart that called a CommandPerform that then called showStart multiple times. I have collapsed those down to a single start action. The main command to perhaps suffer from it is Command.Direct, which used to show a start for each file, and no longer does. Another minor behavior change is that some commands used showStart before, but had an associated file and a Key available, so were changed to ShowStart with an ActionItemAssociatedFile. That will not change the normal output or behavior, but --json output will now include the key. This should not break it for anyone using a real json parser.
2019-06-06 19:42:30 +00:00
next $ inRepo $ Git.Command.runBool
[ Param "push"
, Param "--quiet"
, Param "--delete"
, Param $ Remote.name remote
, Param $ Git.fromRef $ syncBranch b
, Param $ Git.fromRef $ syncBranch $
Git.Ref.base $ Annex.Branch.name
]
where
ai = ActionItemOther (Just (UnquotedString (Remote.name remote)))
si = SeekInput []
2020-02-18 16:29:31 +00:00
shouldSyncContent :: SyncOptions -> Annex Bool
shouldSyncContent o
| noContentOption o = pure False
| contentOption o || not (null (contentOfOption o)) = pure True
| otherwise = getGitConfigVal annexSyncContent <||> onlyAnnex o
sync --only-annex and annex.synconlyannex * Added sync --only-annex, which syncs the git-annex branch and annexed content but leaves managing the other git branches up to you. * Added annex.synconlyannex git config setting, which can also be set with git-annex config to configure sync in all clones of the repo. Use case is then the user has their own git workflow, and wants to use git-annex without disrupting that, so they sync --only-annex to get the git-annex stuff in sync in addition to their usual git workflow. When annex.synconlyannex is set, --not-only-annex can be used to override it. It's not entirely clear what --only-annex --commit or --only-annex --push should do, and I left that combination not documented because I don't know if I might want to change the current behavior, which is that such options do not override the --only-annex. My gut feeling is that there is no good reasons to use such combinations; if you want to use your own git workflow, you'll be doing your own committing and pulling and pushing. A subtle question is, how should import/export special remotes be handled? Importing updates their remote tracking branch and merges it into master. If --only-annex prevented that git branch stuff, then it would prevent exporting to the special remote, in the case where it has changes that were not imported yet, because there would be a unresolved conflict. I decided that it's best to treat the fact that there's a remote tracking branch for import/export as an implementation detail in this case. The more important thing is that an import/export special remote is entirely annexed content, and so it makes a lot of sense that --only-annex will still sync with it.
2020-02-17 19:19:58 +00:00
notOnlyAnnex :: SyncOptions -> Annex Bool
notOnlyAnnex o = not <$> onlyAnnex o
onlyAnnex :: SyncOptions -> Annex Bool
2020-02-18 16:29:31 +00:00
onlyAnnex o
| notOnlyAnnexOption o = pure False
| onlyAnnexOption o = pure True
| otherwise = getGitConfigVal annexSyncOnlyAnnex
isExport :: Remote -> Bool
isExport = exportTree . Remote.config
isImport :: Remote -> Bool
isImport = importTree . Remote.config
isThirdPartyPopulated :: Remote -> Bool
isThirdPartyPopulated = Remote.thirdPartyPopulated . Remote.remotetype
splitRemoteAnnexTrackingBranchSubdir :: Git.Ref -> (Git.Ref, Maybe TopFilePath)
splitRemoteAnnexTrackingBranchSubdir tb = (branch, subdir)
where
(b, p) = separate' (== (fromIntegral (ord ':'))) (Git.fromRef' tb)
branch = Git.Ref b
subdir = if S.null p
then Nothing
else Just (asTopFilePath p)