It will then proceed to add the file the same as if it were any other
file containing possibly annexable content. Usually the file is one that
was annexed before, so the new, probably corrupt content will also be added
to the annex. If the file was not annexed before, the content will be added
to git.
It's not possible for the smudge filter to throw an error here, because
git then just adds the file to git anyway.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
This format is designed to detect accidental appends, while having some
room for future expansion.
Detect when an unlocked file whose content is not present has gotten some
other content appended to it, and avoid treating it as a pointer file, so
that appended content will not be checked into git, but will be annexed
like any other file.
Dropped the max size of a pointer file down to 32kb, it was around 80 kb,
but without any good reason and certianly there are no valid pointer files
anywhere that are larger than 8kb, because it's just been specified what it
means for a pointer file with additional data even looks like.
I assume 32kb will be good enough for anyone. ;-) Really though, it needs
to be some smallish number, because that much of a file in git gets read
into memory when eg, catting pointer files. And since we have no use cases
for the extra lines of a pointer file yet, except possibly to add
some human-visible explanation that it is a git-annex pointer file, 32k
seems as reasonable an arbitrary number as anything. Increasing it would be
possible, eg to 64k, as long as users of such jumbo pointer files didn't
mind upgrading all their git-annex installations to one that supports the
new larger size.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
A few places were reading the max symlink size of a pointer file,
then passing tp parseLinkTargetOrPointer. Which is fine currently, but
to support pointer files with lines of data after the pointer, enough
has to be read that parseLinkTargetOrPointer can be assured of seeing
enough of that data to know if it's correctly formatted.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Only one place remained that differentiated between them.
It is the case that a symlink target that happens to contain a newline
somehow will be treated as a link to a key truncated at the newline.
This is super unlikely to happen, and since a key cannot actually
contain a newline, it's as good a behavior as any. Anyway, this commit
does not change the behavior there, although arguably it should be
changed. Note that getAnnexLinkTarget does prevent a symlink target
containing a newline.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
File matching options like --include will be rejected in situations where
there is no filename to match against. (Or where there is a filename but
it's not relative to the cwd, or otherwise seemed too bothersome to match
against.)
The addition of listKeys' was necessary to avoid using more memory in the
common case of "git-annex info". Adding a filterM would have caused the
list to buffer in memory and not stream. This is an ugly hack, but listKeys
had previously run Annex operations inside unafeInterleaveIO (for direct
mode). And matching against a matcher should hopefully not change any Annex
state.
This does allow for eg `git-annex info somefile --include=*.ext`
although why someone would want to do that I don't really know. But it
seems to make sense to allow it.
But, consider: `git-annex info ./somefile --include=somefile`
This does not match, so will not display info about somefile.
If the user really wants to, they can `--include=./somefile`.
Using matching options like --copies or --in=remote seems likely to be
slower than git-annex find with those options, because unlike such
commands, info does not have optimised streaming through the matcher.
Note that `git-annex info remote` is not the same as
`git-annex info --in remote`. The former shows info about all files in
the remote. The latter shows local keys that are also in that remote.
The output should make that clear, but this still seems like a point
where users could get confused.
Sponsored-by: Jochen Bartl on Patreon
Implemented by making Git.Queue have a FlushAction, which can accumulate
along with another action on files, and runs only once the other action has
run.
This lets git-annex unlock queue up git update-index actions, without
conflicting with the restagePointerFiles FlushActions.
In a repository with filter-process enabled, git-annex unlock will
often not take any more time than before, though it may when the files are
large. Either way, it should always slow down less than git-annex status
speeds up.
When filter-process is not enabled, git-annex unlock will slow down as much
as git status speeds up.
Sponsored-by: Jochen Bartl on Patreon
This avoids a later git status or similar taking a long time to run
as it runs git-annex smudge once per file. While v9 repositories do
avoid that taking long when the files are small, large files can still
make git status take a very long time.
This does make unlock slower, because now git-annex smudge is being run
once per file unlocked. However, the next commit should speed that up in
many cases.
Sponsored-by: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on Patreon
annex.skipunknown now defaults to false, so commands like `git annex get foo*`
will not silently skip over files/dirs that are not checked into git.
Sponsored-by: Brock Spratlen on Patreon
* registerurl, unregisterurl: Improved output when reading from stdin
to be more like other batch commands.
* registerurl, unregisterurl: Added --json and --json-error-messages options.
Note that this did change the --batch output in a way that could possibly
break something that expected the old output to never change. I think it's
acceptable to break that because there has never been a guarantee of
unchanging output format except with --batch for most commands. The old
output was just really weird too!
One possible wart is that "git-annex registerurl" with no options now
seems to just hang, since it's waiting for stdin input. Before, it said
"registerurl (stdin)" which was clearer about what's happenening. But this
is a deprecated mode anyway, --batch makes clear what's happening. If
anything, this problem would be a reason to eventually remove the support
for reading from stdin w/o --batch.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
