hothasktags was removed from Debian. And in the meantime hasktags
improved so it works well in the source tree.
Also make dev update tags.
Sponsored-by: Jack Hill on Patreon
prop_relPathDirToFileAbs_basics (TestableFilePath ":/") failed on
windows. The colon was filtered out after trying to make
the path relative, which only removed leading path separators.
So, ":/" changed to "/" which is not relative. Filtering out the colon
before hand avoids this problem.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
Removed vendored copy of http-client-restricted, and removed the
HttpClientRestricted build flag that avoided that dependency.
http-client-restricted is in Debian stable, and the i386ancient build also
uses it, so I think this vendored copy is no longer needed.
Sponsored-by: Noam Kremen on Patreon
This should let i386ancient limp along for a few years more, beyond the
removal of those vendored deps from git-annex.
Also networkbsd is set now, so probably the last thing to unset that
flag is gone, and the flag could be removed soon.
Sponsored-by: Jarkko Kniivilä on Patreon
The new ansi-terminal was needed for test concurrency, and the new
concurrent-output fixes several bugs. And it turns out this is all
that's needed to use the new tasty.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Dependency issues were looking difficult to support tasty-1.2 with that
build. Not using `after` only affects rerunning and limiting tests,
since tasty's concurrency is not used, so this build will just not
support that.
We are probably nearing end of life on this build; it also doesn't
support git-lfs or http-client-restricted. The 2.6.32 kernel it supports
is at this point 13 years old, and stopped being supported by linux LTS
developers 10 years ago. It was supported by RHEL 6.10 through November
2020. At this point, no new hardware should be shipping with this
kernel, but that probably does not stop certian embedded vendors from
shipping it. And there is certainly some hardware still using it. But
the returns from supporting it are diminishing, and the quality of the
build for it is also diminishing.
Sponsored-by: Nicholas Golder-Manning on Patreon
add: Avoid unncessarily converting a newly unlocked file to be stored
in git when it is not modified, even when annex.largefiles does not
match it.
This fixes a reversion in version 10.20220222, where git-annex unlock
followed by git-annex add, followed by git commit file could result in
git thinking the file was modified after the commit.
I do have half a mind to remove the withUnmodifiedUnlockedPointers part
of git-annex add. It seems weird, despite that old bug report arguing
a case of consistency that it ought to behave that way. When git-annex
add surpises me, it seems likely it's wrong.. But for now, this is the
smallest possible fix.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Directory special remotes with importtree=yes have changed to once more
take inodes into account. This will cause extra work when importing from a
directory on a FAT filesystem that changes inodes on every mount.
To avoid that extra work, set ignoreinodes=yes when initializing a new
directory special remote, or change the configuration of your existing
remote: git-annex enableremote foo ignoreinodes=yes
This will mean a one-time re-import of all contents from every directory
special remote due to the changed setting.
73df633a62 thought
it was too unlikely that there would be modifications that the inode number
was needed to notice. That was probably right; it's very unlikely that a
file will get modified and end up with the same size and mtime as before.
But, what was not considered is that a program like NextCloud might write
two files with different content so closely together that they share the
mtime. The inode is necessary to detect that situation.
Sponsored-by: Max Thoursie on Patreon
Default to the number of CPU cores, which seems about optimal
on my laptop. Using one more saves me 2 seconds actually.
Better packing of workers improves speed significantly.
In 2 tests runs, I saw segfaulting workers despite my attempt
to work around that issue. So detect when a worker does, and re-run it.
Removed installSignalHandlers again, because I was seeing an
error "lost signal due to full pipe", which I guess was somehow caused
by using it.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Using concurrent-output this is easy. Just have to check if tasty has
color enabled, and propagate it into the worker processes, some of which
will be run without a controlling console.
Also added a call to installSignalHandlers; I noticed that interrupting
the test suite could leave the console in a bad state and this fixes
that.
The ansi-terminal dependency is free, since tasty also depends on it.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Unit tests are the main bulk of runtime, so splitting them into 2 or 3
parts should help.
For now, the number of parts is still 1, because on my 4 core laptop,
2 was a little bit slower, and 3 slower yet. However, this probably does
vary based on the number of cores, so needs to be revisited, and perhaps
made dynamic.
Since each test mode gets split into the specified number of parts,
plus property and remote tests, 2 gives 8 parts, and 3 gives 11 parts.
Load went to maybe 18, so there was probably contention slowing things
down.
So probably it needs to start N workers with some parts, and when a
worker finishes, run it with the next part, until all parts are
processed.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Note the very weird workaround for what appears to be some kind of tasty
bug, which causes a segfault. This is not new to this modification,
I was seeing a segfault before at least intermittently when limiting
git-annex test -p to only run a single test group.
Also, the path from one test repo to a remote test repo used to be
"../../foo", which somehow broke when moving the test repos from .t to
.t/N. I don't actually quite understand how it used to work, but
"../foo" seems correct and works in the new situation.
Test output from the concurrent processes is not yet serialized.
Should be easy to do using concurrent-output.
More test groups will probably make the speedup larger. It would
probably be best to have a larger number of test groups and divvy them
amoung subprocesses numbered based on the number of CPU cores, perhaps
times 2 or 3.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
