This reverts commit 47358a6f95.
This added overhead, and will not be needed, because appends are going
to have to be made atomic for other reasons than avoiding incomplete
reads of data being appended.
In particular, when git-annex is interrupted in the middle of an append,
it must not leave the file with a partially written line. So appending
has to somehow be made fully atomic.
Currently this is not an improvement, but it allows for optimising
appendJournalFile later. With an optimised appendJournalFile, this will
greatly speed up access patterns like git-annex addurl of a lot of urls
to the same key, where the log file can grow rather large. Appending
rather than re-writing the journal file for each line can save a lot of
disk writes.
It still has to read the current journal or branch file, to check
if it can append to it, and so when the journal file does not exist yet,
it can write the old content from the branch to it. Probably the re-reads
are better cached by the filesystem than repeated writes. (If the
re-reads turn out to keep performance bad, they could be eliminated, at
the cost of not being able to compact the log when replacing old
information in it. That could be enabled by a switch.)
While the immediate need is to affect addurl writes, it was implemented
at the level of presence logs, so will also perhaps speed up location logs.
The only added overhead is the call to isNewInfo, which only needs to
compare ByteStrings. Helping to balance that out, it avoids compactLog
when it's able to append.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
It started complaining about custom setup needing too old a version of
cabal, a very confusing error message.
1.12 is the version of Cabal on the i386ancient builder.
Sponsored-by: Jack Hill on Patreon
This is not currently necessary; journal files are updated atomically.
However, for faster appends to large journal files, locking on read will
be needed, because appends are not atomic.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
Fix a reversion that prevented --batch commands (and the assistant)
from noticing data written to the journal by other commands.
I have not identified which commit broke this for sure,
but probably it was aeca7c2207
--batch commands that wrote to the journal avoided the problem since
journalIgnorable sets unset on write. It's a little bit surprising that
nobody noticed that query --batch commands did not see data written by
other commands.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
It does not make sense for either; importing from an existing bucket should
not write to it. And the user may not have write access at all. And exporting to
a bucket should not write other files.
Also this prevents the uuid file being imported after being written.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
To avoid using find -printf, which was first supported in Android around
2019-2020.
Probing seems too fragile, and execing stat once per file is too slow to do
when there's a faster way available, which brought me to an option...
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
This caused git to complain that filter-process failed and kill it with
signal 15. Because it wrote an extra flushPkt for an empty file, which
git did not expect, and so git saw an unexpected response to the next
request.
Luckily, filter-process is only used by default in v9 and up, and v8 is
still the default. Also, git had to be updating an empty file, followed
by another file, which is a fairly unlikely situation. And git restarts
filter-process after this happens and uses it to filter the rest of the
files. So this isn't a crippling bug.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
