Do not populate the keys database with associated files,
because a bare repo has no working tree, and so it does not make sense to
populate it.
Queries of associated files in the keys database always return empty lists
in a bare repo, even if it's somehow populated. One way it could be
populated is if a user converts a non-bare repo to a bare repo.
Note that Git.Config.isBare does a string comparison, so this is not free!
But, that string comparison is very small compared to a sqlite query.
Sponsored-by: Erik Bjäreholt on Patreon
Recover from corrupted content being received from a git remote due eg to a
wire error, by deleting the temporary file when it fails to verify. This
prevents a retry from failing again.
Reversion introduced in version 8.20210903, when incremental verification
was added.
Only the git remote seems to be affected, although it is certianly
possible that other remotes could later have the same issue. This only
affects things passed to getViaTmp that return (False, UnVerified) due to
verification failing. As far as getViaTmp can tell, that could just as well
mean that the transfer failed in a way that would resume, so it cannot
delete the temp file itself. Remote.Git and P2P.Annex use getViaTmp internally,
while other remotes do not, which is why only it seems affected.
A better fix perhaps would be to improve the types of the callback
passed to getViaTmp, so that some other value could be used to indicate
the state where the transfer succeeded but verification failed.
Sponsored-by: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
So that importing does not replace them with plain files.
This works similarly to how the previous handling of submodules and
matchers did, except that annexed symlinks still get exported as plain
files of course, it's only non-annexed symlinks that it does not make sense
to export.
When symlinks have previously been exported, updating the export will
unexport them after upgrading to this commit.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Capstone to this feature. Any transitions that have been performed on an
unmerged remote ref but not on the local git-annex branch, or vice-versa
have to be applied on the fly when reading files.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Continuing along the same lines as commit
2739adc258, it seems that
while Remote -> Retriever expands to the same data type this changes
it to, ghc 9.0.1 refuses to consider them equiviant. I guess it has
something to do with the forall?
The rest of the build all succeeds, although the stack build then crashes:
Linking .stack-work/dist/x86_64-linux-tinfo6/Cabal-3.4.0.0/build/git-annex/git-annex ...
Completed 233 action(s).
Prelude.chr: bad argument: 2214592520
This issue seems likely to be about it:
https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/pull/5508
I'm building with stack from debian, version 2.3.3, so a newer stack
probably avoids that. Anyway, despite that stack problem,
the git-annex binary is built, and works.
The stack.yaml I used for this build was patched as follows:
diff --git a/stack.yaml b/stack.yaml
index 8dac87c15..62c4b5b9d 100644
--- a/stack.yaml
+++ b/stack.yaml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
flags:
git-annex:
- production: true
+ production: false
assistant: true
pairing: true
torrentparser: true
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ flags:
httpclientrestricted: true
packages:
- '.'
-resolver: lts-18.13
+resolver: nightly-2021-09-07
extra-deps:
- IfElse-0.85
- aws-0.22
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
This reverts commit 66b2536ea0.
I misunderstood commit ac56a5c2a0
and caused a FD leak when pid locking is not used.
A LockHandle contains an action that will close the underlying lock
file, and that action is run when it is closed. In the case of a shared
lock, the lock file is opened once for each LockHandle, and only
the one for the LockHandle that is being closed will be closed.
Seem there are several races that happen when 2 threads run PidLock.tryLock
at the same time. One involves checkSaneLock of the side lock file, which may
be deleted by another process that is dropping the lock, causing checkSaneLock
to fail. And even with the deletion disabled, it can still fail, Probably due
to linkToLock failing when a second thread overwrites the lock file.
The same can happen when 2 processes do, but then one process just fails
to take the lock, which is fine. But with 2 threads, some actions where failing
even though the process as a whole had the pid lock held.
Utility.LockPool.PidLock already maintains a STM lock, and since it uses
LockShared, 2 threads can hold the pidlock at the same time, and when
the first thread drops the lock, it will remain held by the second
thread, and so the pid lock file should not get deleted until the last
thread to hold it drops the lock. Which is the right behavior, and why a
LockShared STM lock is used in the first place.
The problem is that each time it takes the STM lock, it then also calls
PidLock.tryLock. So that was getting called repeatedly and concurrently.
Fixed by noticing when the shared lock is already held, and stop calling
PidLock.tryLock again, just use the pid lock that already exists then.
Also, LockFile.PidLock.tryLock was deleting the pid lock when it failed
to take the lock, which was entirely wrong. It should only drop the side
lock.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
It ought to exist, since linkToLock has just created it. However,
Lustre seems to have a rather probabilisitic view of the contents of a
directory, so catching the error if it somehow does not exist and
running the same code path that would be ran if linkToLock failed
might avoid this fun Lustre failure.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Commit b6e4ed9aa7 made non-annexed files
be re-uploaded every time, since they're not tracked in the location log,
and it made it check the location log. Don't do that for non-annexed files.
Sponsored-by: Brock Spratlen on Patreon
This version of git -- or its new default "ort" resolver -- handles such
a conflict by staging two files, one with the original name and the other
named file~ref. Use unmergedSiblingFile when the latter is detected.
(It doesn't do that when the conflict is between a directory and a file
or symlink though, so see previous commit for how that case is handled.)
The sibling file has to be deleted separately, because cleanConflictCruft
may not delete it -- that only handles files that are annex links,
but the sibling file may be the non-annexed file side of the conflict.
The graftin code had assumed that, when the other side of a conclict
is a symlink, the file in the work tree will contain the non-annexed
content that we want it to contain. But that is not the case with the new
git; the file may be the annex link and needs to be replaced with the
content, while the annex link will be written as a -variant file.
(The weird doesDirectoryExist check in graftin turns out to still be
needed, test suite failed when I tried to remove it.)
Test suite passes with new git with ort resolver default. Have not tried it
with old git or other defaults.
Sponsored-by: Noam Kremen on Patreon
The new "ort" resolver uses different filenames than what the test suite
accepted when resolving a conflict between a directory an an annexed
file. Make the test looser in what it accepts, so it will work with old
and new git.
Other tests still look for "conflictor.variant" as a prefix,
because when eg resolving a conflicted merge of 2 annexed files,
the filename is not changed by the ort resolver, and I didn't want to
unncessarily loosen the test.
Also I'm not entirely happy with the filenames used by the ort resolver,
see comment.
There's still another test failure caused by that resolver that is not
fixed yet.
See comment for analysis.
At first I thought I'd need to convert all T.unpack in git-annex, but
luckily not -- so long as the Text is read from a file, the filesystem
encoding is applied and T.unpack is fine. It's only when using Feed
that the filesystem encoding is not applied.
While this fixes the crash, it does result in some mojibake, eg:
itemid=http://www.manager-tools.com/2014/01/choosing-a-company-work-chapter-7-���-questions/
Have not tracked that down, but it must be unrelated, because
I've verified that it roundtrips when using encodeUf8:
joey@darkstar:~/src/git-annex>LANG=C ghci Utility/FileSystemEncoding.hs
ghci> useFileSystemEncoding
ghci> Just f <- Text.Feed.Import.parseFeedFromFile "/home/joey/tmp/career_tools_podcasts.xml"
ghci> Just (_, x) = Text.Feed.Query.getItemId (Text.Feed.Query.feedItems f !! 0)
ghci> decodeBS (Data.Text.Encoding.encodeUtf8 x)
"http://www.manager-tools.com/2014/01/choosing-a-company-work-chapter-7-\56546\56448\56467-questions/"
ghci> writeFile "foo" $ decodeBS (Data.Text.Encoding.encodeUtf8 x)
Writes a file containing the ENDASH character.
Sponsored-by: Jochen Bartl on Patreon
