Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5a415191d
commit
d56267f0cc
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="yarikoptic"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
|
||||
subject="comment 3"
|
||||
date="2021-12-08T18:56:51Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
+1 on the idea of \"combine them in memory the same as if a merge had been done.\" -- sounds great to me, even though indeed might cost some performance. I would assume that with `annex.merge-annex-branches=false` such operation would be skipped, and then read-only operations would operate on current, possibly lacking some merges git-annex branch
|
||||
|
||||
re \"wanted\": tried on the same repository, but it was updated so its git-annex branch is now up to date with the remote one... For now just managed to unravel a more of a UX issue: [https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/wanted_on_read-only_repo_crashes_/?updated](https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/wanted_on_read-only_repo_crashes_/?updated)
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue