Unlike git add -u, git annex add -u does not update the index for files
removed from the working tree. But then, "git add ." stages removals,
and "git annex add ." does not, so that's an existing divergence.
Seems that --update --batch would need to run git ls-files once per line of
batch input, which would surely be too slow, so just throw an error for
that.
This commit was supported by the NSF-funded DataLad project.
This was never supported before. And it doesn't re-encrypt the
gcrypt repo to the new gcrypt-participants, but it does at least now not
crash, and set gcrypt-participants.
This commit was sponsored by andrea rota.
They were silently ignored, a reversion introduced in 6.20160527.
I don't like this regular git remote special case in enableremote, but I
can't see a way to get rid of it. So, check if the existing remote is
a Remote.Git
This commit was sponsored by Trenton Cronholm on Patreon.
This is necessary because as feared, the extra -n parameter that git-annex
passes breaks uses of these environment variables that expect exactly the
parameters that git passes.
For example, see https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1456
It would of course be possible to pre-close stdin before running ssh so not
needing the -n, and I think that would not even break ssh's password
caching. But it would probably involve a lot of work, possibly would need
to deal with some layering violations, and would be error-prone. The really
clean fix would be to make all the ssh stuff return a CreateProcess, which
could have the handle closed when appropriate, but that would be a large
reworing of the code base.
This commit was supported by the NSF-funded DataLad project.
The former can be useful to make remotes that don't get fully synced with
local changes, which comes up in a lot of situations.
The latter was mostly added for symmetry, but could be useful (though less
likely to be).
Implementing `remote.<name>.annex-pull` was a bit tricky, as there's no one
place where git-annex pulls/fetches from remotes. I audited all
instances of "fetch" and "pull". A few cases were left not checking this
config:
* Git.Repair can try to pull missing refs from a remote, and if the local
repo is corrupted, that seems a reasonable thing to do even though
the config would normally prevent it.
* Assistant.WebApp.Gpg and Remote.Gcrypt and Remote.Git do fetches
as part of the setup process of a remote. The config would probably not
be set then, and having the setup fail seems worse than honoring it if it
is already set.
I have not prevented all the code that does a "merge" from merging branches
from remotes with remote.<name>.annex-pull=false. That could perhaps
be done, but it would need a way to map from branch name to remote name,
and the way refspecs work makes that hard to get really correct. So if the
user fetches manually, the git-annex branch will get merged, for example.
Anther way of looking at/justifying this is that the setting is called
"annex-pull", not "annex-merge".
This commit was supported by the NSF-funded DataLad project.
