followup
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c722069ea
commit
ee8bbf33bb
2 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -26,3 +26,5 @@ is running. The upload of the actual changeset starts after this, the processes
|
|||
### Have you had any luck using git-annex before? (Sometimes we get tired of reading bug reports all day and a lil' positive end note does wonders)
|
||||
|
||||
git-annex is great and revolutionized my file organization and backup structure (if they were even existing before)
|
||||
|
||||
[[!meta tite="gcrypt special remotes should support rsync:// and perhaps also sftp://"]]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 3"""
|
||||
date="2017-04-05T18:35:30Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
It should be possible for git-annex to support rsync:// for gcrypt special
|
||||
remotes; that would just need to reuse the rsync special remote for the
|
||||
git-annex objects. Retitling this bug report appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
In the meantime, it should work to set up a gcrypt git remote (not a
|
||||
git-annex special remote) using rsync:// or sftp:// and then use a
|
||||
git-annex rsync special remote on the same server to store the annex
|
||||
objects.
|
||||
|
||||
But that doesn't help with large pushes to gcrypt remotes
|
||||
when git hosting providers are being used, which is a main
|
||||
use case for using gcrypt (though generally not the gcrypt special remote).
|
||||
The lack of incrementals there seems like something worth finding a way to
|
||||
fix in gcrypt.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue