Eg when the destination is logged as containing a file, skip
actively checking that it does contain it.
Note that --fast does not prevent other verifications of content
location that are done in a copy --from --to. Perhaps it could, but this
change will already avoid the real unnecessary work of operating on
files that are already in the remote.
And avoiding other verifications
might cause it to fail if the location log thinks that --to does not
contain the content but does. Such complications with `git-annex copy
--to remote --fast` led to commit d006586cd0
which added a note that gets displayed when that fails, mentioning it
might be due to --fast being enabled.
copy --from --to is already complicated enough without needing to worry
about such edge cases, so continuing to doing some verification of
content location after the initial --fast filtering seems ok.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
The gnuplot output is pretty good, but could still be improved with:
* more colors (repeating colors is confusing with a lot of repos)
* better positioning of the legend, making the plot wider and moving it
from over top of the graph
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Only counting received and not dropped makes this show the bandwidth of
data coming into the repository, although only in a sense. Since
git-annex branch updates only happen at the end of a command, and we
don't know when a command started, it's only an approximation of the
actual bandwidth. (A previous git-annex branch update made have
happened in a different repository.)
It would be possible to also add a --dropped option, but I don't know
how useful that would be?
Sponsored-by: Nicholas Golder-Manning on Patreon
For example, my sound repo has in the git-annex branch a commit from
2036, which is followed by one from 2034, in amoung commits from 2013.
Clearly there was a problem with the clock.
Since git log --date-order has a behavior of
"Show no parents before all of its children are shown", the data still
gets processed ok. The future timestamp just prevented displaying data
after that commit. It seems better, when the clock was wrong, to display
a wrong date, and then return to right dates.
It would be nice to filter out the wrong dates from display entirely,
but that seems it would need to buffer the whole output. This command is
too slow to buffer it all before displaying anything, and anyway this
kind of problem is probably rare.
Sponsored-by: Joshua Antonishen on Patreon
With this, git annex log --totalsizes can be compared with
git-annex info's "combined annex size of all repositories"
to double-check it works correctly.
In my sound repo, the two match.
In my big repo, the two report slightly different sizes,
with the former being 1.3 gb smaller than the latter.
I don't know the reason for this disreprency. Given the 30+tb size of
the repo, it's a small difference.
It seems possible that a bug in an old version of git-annex could
explain it. Eg, if an old git-annex lost a line when updating trust.log
or a location log in a merge, git-annex info would see only what it
replaced it with, while git-annex log will see the previous value as
well.
Sponsored-by: Leon Schuermann on Patreon
Noticed that Semigroup instance of Map is not suitable to use
for MapLog. For example, it behaved like this:
ghci> parseTrustLog "foo 1 timestamp=10\nfoo 2 timestamp=11" <> parseTrustLog "foo X timestamp=12"
fromList [(UUID "foo",LogEntry {changed = VectorClock 11s, value = SemiTrusted})]
Which was wrong, it lost the newer DeadTrusted value.
Luckily, nothing used that Semigroup when operating on a MapLog. And this
provides a safe instance.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
CSV format so it can be fed into a program to graph it.
Note that dead repositories are not yet handled so their sizes show as
nonzero after they are marked dead.
Sponsored-By: k0ld on Patreon
This can take a lot of memory. I decided to violate the usual rule in
git-annex that it operate in constant memory no matter how many annexed
objects. In this case, it would be hard to be fast without using a big
map of the location logs. The main difficulty here is that there can be
many git-annex branches and it needs to display a consistent view at a
point in time, which means merging information from multiple git-annex
branches.
I have not checked if there are any laziness leaks in this code. It
takes 1 gb to run in my big repo, which is around what I estimated
before writing it.
2 options that are documented are not yet implemented.
Small bug: With eg --when=1h, it will display at 12:00 then 1:10 if the
next change after 12:59 is then. Then it waits until after 2:10 to
display the next change. It ought to wait until after 2:00.
Sponsored-by: Brock Spratlen on Patreon
Factored out overLocationLogs from CmdLine.Seek, which can calculate this
pretty fast even in a large repo. In my big repo, the time to run git-annex
info went up from 1.33s to 8.5s.
Note that the "backend usage" stats are for annexed files in the working
tree only, not all annexed files. This new data source would let that be
changed, but that would be a confusing behavior change. And I cannot
retitle it either, out of fear something uses the current title (eg parsing
the json).
Also note that, while time says "402108maxresident" in my big repo now,
up from "54092maxresident", top shows the RES constant at 64mb, and it
was 48mb before. So I don't think there is a memory leak. I tried using
deepseq to force full evaluation of addKeyCopies and memory use didn't
change, which also says no memory leak. And indeed, not even calling
addKeyCopies resulted in the same memory use. Probably the increased memory
usage is buffering the stream of data from git in overLocationLogs.
Sponsored-by: Brett Eisenberg on Patreon
