The content file may not be owned by the user running git-annex, in which
case, setting the owner write bit was not enough to let lockContent
act on the file. However, with some core.sharedRepository configs, the file
should be writable by the user's group. So, the thing to do is to call
thawContent on it.
It was returning Just False in this situation, which differed from indirect
mode behavior. I don't think this led to any actual problems; things that
checked if the file being dropped was present just failed to fail, and
instead reported it wasn't present, possibly incorrectly.
Hmm, it's possible that this could have made git annex fsck --from remote
update the location log wrongly, if a remote was in direct mode, and was in
the middle of trying to drop a key, and the drop later failed.
Also cleaned up the code, avoiding creating a lock file if we're going to
open it for create later anyway.
And, if there's an exception while preparing to lock the file, but not at
the point of actually taking the lock, throw an exception, instead of
silently not locking and pretending to succeed.
And, on Windows, always use lock file, even if the repo somehow got into
indirect mode (maybe with cygwin git..)
The one exception is in Utility.Daemon. As long as a process only
daemonizes once, which seems reasonable, and as long as it avoids calling
checkDaemon once it's already running as a daemon, the fcntl locking
gotchas won't be a problem there.
Annex.LockFile has it's own separate lock pool layer, which has been
renamed to LockCache. This is a persistent cache of locks that persist
until closed.
This is not quite done; lockContent stil needs to be converted.
The search seems to only find spammy tweets. I know people talk about
git-anenx on twitter, but it seems twitter's search does not find those
interesting conversations.
