git-annex get when run as the first git-annex command in a new repo did not
populate unlocked files. (Reversion in version 8.20210621)
I am not entirely happy with this, because I don't understand how
428c91606b caused the problem in the first
place, and I don't fully understand how skipping calling scanAnnexedFiles
during autoinit avoids the problem.
Kept the explicit call to scanAnnexedFiles during git-annex init,
so that when reconcileStaged is expensive, it can be made to run then,
rather than at some later point when the information is needed.
Sponsored-by: Brock Spratlen on Patreon
I'm now reasonably sure I've identified both cases where this can
happen. v8 upgrades and certian filesystems eg NFS. Both are handled as
well as can be, though it may involve some extra checksumming work.
Eg, showImprecise 1 1.99 returned "1.1" rather than "2". The 9 rounded
upward to 10, and that was wrongly used as the decimal, rather than
carrying the 1.
Sponsored-by: Jack Hill on Patreon
An easy way to see this in action is to have an unlocked file, and touch the
object file.
While all code that compares inode caches for object files needs to be
prepared for this kind of problem and fall back to verification, having
fsck notice it and correct it is cheap (as long as fsck is being run
anyway) and ensures that if it happens for some unusual reason, there's a
way for the user to notice that it's happening.
Not that, when annex.thin is in use, the earlier call to isUnmodified
(and also potentially earlier calls to inAnnex in eg, verifyLocationLog)
will fix up the same problem silently. That might prevent the warning
being displayed, although probably it still will be, because the
Database.Keys write of the InodeCache will be queued but will not have
happened yet. I can't see a way to improve this, but it's not great.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
Fix bug that caused some transfers to incorrectly fail with "content
changed while it was being sent", when the content was not changed.
While I don't know how to reproduce the problem that several people
reported, it is presumably due to the inode cache somehow being stale.
So check isUnmodified', and if it's not modified, include the file's
current inode cache in the set to accept, when checking for modification
after the transfer.
That seems like the right thing to do for another reason: The failure
says the file changed while it was being sent, but if the object file was
changed before the transfer started, that's wrong. So it needs to check
before allowing the transfer at all if the file is modified.
(Other calls to sameInodeCache or elemInodeCaches, when operating on inode
caches from the database, could also be problimatic if the inode cache is
somehow getting stale. This does not address such problems.)
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
