Implementation was simple because it's equivilant to
--from=foo --to remote for each other remote, followed by
--to remote when there's a local copy.
(Or, in the edge case of --from-anywhere --to=here,
it's the same as --to=here.)
Note that, when the local repo does not have a copy,
fromToPerform gets it from a remote, sends it to the destination,
and drops the local copy. Another call to that for a second remote
will notice that the dest now has a copy, and simply drop from the
second remote, avoiding a second transfer.
Also note that, when numcopies doesn't allow dropping it from
everywhere, it will drop it from the cheapest remotes first
(maybe not ideal) up to more expensive remotes, and finally from the local
repo. So the local repo will generally end up holding a copy. Maybe not
ideal in all cases either, but it seems no worse to do that than to end up
with a copy undropped from a remote.
And I'm not entirely happy with the output, eg:
copy bigfile (from r3...) ok
copy bigfile ok
That makes sense if you think of the second line as being
the same as what is output by `git-annex copy bigfile --to bar`,
but it's less clear in this context. Maybe add "(from here...)"?
Also the --json output doesn't have a machine-readable field for
the "from" uuid, and maybe it should?
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
Eg when the destination is logged as containing a file, skip
actively checking that it does contain it.
Note that --fast does not prevent other verifications of content
location that are done in a copy --from --to. Perhaps it could, but this
change will already avoid the real unnecessary work of operating on
files that are already in the remote.
And avoiding other verifications
might cause it to fail if the location log thinks that --to does not
contain the content but does. Such complications with `git-annex copy
--to remote --fast` led to commit d006586cd0
which added a note that gets displayed when that fails, mentioning it
might be due to --fast being enabled.
copy --from --to is already complicated enough without needing to worry
about such edge cases, so continuing to doing some verification of
content location after the initial --fast filtering seems ok.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
This allows getting rid of the ugly and error prone handling of
"bag of bytes" String in Remote.Helper.Encryptable.
Avoiding breakage like that dealt with by commit
9862d64bf9
And allows converting Utility.Gpg to use ByteString for IO, which is
a welcome change.
Tested the new git-annex interoperability with old, using all 3
encryption= types.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
The crash occurred because writeCreds got called twice, and writeFileProtected
neglected to close its file handle, so the file was open for write when
written the second time.
It seems unncessary and suboptimal that writeCreds gets called twice.
One call is from getRemoteCredPair and the other from setRemoteCredPair'.
What happens is that in the enableremote case, code that also runs at
initremote does unncessary work. Might be possible to improve that, but
I've gone for the simple fix.
Sponsored-by: k0ld on Patreon
git-annex only writes regular files there, but other things may drop junk
like empty .DAV directories around the tree. And trying to hash such things
can have weird and hard to understand effects. So it seems best to do a
small amount of work in statting the journal file to make sure it's a
regular file.
Sponsored-by: Jack Hill on Patreon
push: When on an adjusted branch, propagate changes to parent branch before
updating export remotes.
This is a somewhat redundant call to propigateAdjustedCommits, since it
also gets called at pushLocal time. That other one needs to come after
importing from importtree remotes though, and seekExportContent has to come
earlier, so I don't see a way to avoid doing it twice.
Note that git-annex sync also manages to avoid the problem, it's only
git-annex push that had the bug.
Sponsored-by: Leon Schuermann on Patreon
Fix more breakage caused by git's fix for CVE-2022-24765, this time
involving a remote (either local or ssh) that is a repository not owned by
the current user.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
Only display warning when git-annex sync (without --content or
--no-content) is used with repositories that have preferred content
configured.
Sponsored-by: Leon Schuermann on Patreon
Failure to remove is not treated as a problem, and no permissions
modifications are done, to avoid unexpected states.
Sponsored-by: Luke Shumaker on Patreon
* S3: Amazon S3 buckets created after April 2023 do not support ACLs,
so public=yes cannot be used with them. Existing buckets configured
with public=yes will keep working.
* S3: Allow setting publicurl=yes without public=yes, to support
buckets that are configured with a Bucket Policy that allows public
access.
Sponsored-by: Joshua Antonishen on Patreon
This causes changes to the original branch to get merged with a single
sync. Before, it took 2 syncs; the first happened to update the synced/
branch, and the second merged changes from the synced/ branch into the
ajusted branch.
Using mergeToAdjustedBranch when tomerge == origbranch is probably
overkill, but it does work fine.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Bug fix: Re-running git-annex adjust or sync when in an adjusted branch
would overwrite the original branch, losing any commits that had been made
to it since the adjusted branch was created.
When git-annex adjust is run in this situation, it will display a warning
about the diverged branches.
When git-annex sync is run in this situation, mergeToAdjustedBranch
will merge the changes from the original branch to the adjusted branch.
So it does not need to display the divergence warning.
Note that for some reason, I'm needing to run sync twice for that to
happen. The first run does not do the merge and the second does. I'm unsure
why and so am not fully done with this bug.
Sponsored-By: the NIH-funded NICEMAN (ReproNim TR&D3) project
Running git config --list inside .git then fails, so better to only
do that when --git-dir was specified explicitly. Otherwise, when the
repository is not bare, run the command inside the working tree.
Also make init detect when the uuid it just set cannot be read and fail
with an error, in case git changes something that breaks this later.
I still don't actually understand why git-annex add/assist -J2 was
affected but -J1 was not. But I did show that it was skipping writing to
the location log, because the uuid was NoUUID.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
