This is how direct mode does it too, and somehow, for reasons that
currently escape me, this makes git merge not care if it's run with an
empty work tree.
Was using L.readFile, so the Handle would remain open until the garbage
collector got around to it. Changed to explicit open and close, so we know
it's always closed when the function returns.
This makes the direct mode to v6 upgrade able to be performed in one clone
of a repository without affecting other clones, which can continue using v5
and direct mode.
This does mean that it has to write out temp files containing updated
objects for the merge. So may use more disk space, and disk IO, but that
should generally win out over needing to launch N separate
git hash-object processes.
An unlocked present file does not have a pointer file in the worktree, so
info skipped counting it.
It may be that unused was also affected by the problem, but it seemed not
to be in my tests. I think because of the use of the associatedFilesFilter.
This fix slows down both info and unused a little bit, since they have to
query the contents of files from git, but only when handling unlocked files.
Only reverse adjust the changes in the commit, which means that adjustments
do not need to be generally cleanly reversable.
For example, an adjustment can unlock all locked files, but does not need
to worry about files that were originally unlocked when reversing, because
it will only ever be run on files that have been changed. So, it's ok
if it locks all files when reversed, or even leaves all files as-is when
reversed.
Using adjusted/unlocked/master made lots of git stuff dealing with "master"
complain that it was ambiguous. This new appoach is more like view branch
names, and shows the adjustment right there in the branch display even if
only the basename of the branch is shown.
There's a race here, but entering an adjusted branch for the first time is
not something to do when a commit is being made at the same time. Although,
may want to prevent the assistant from committing while entering the
adjusted branch.
So, it will pull and push the original branch, not the adjusted one.
And, for merging, it will use updateAdjustedBranch (not implemented yet).
Note that remaining uses of Git.Branch.current need to be checked too;
for things that should act on the original branch, and not the adjusted
branch.
