Potentially fixes https://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/concurrent_git-annex-copy_to_s3_special_remote_fails/
although I don't know if it does.
My thinking is, ResourceT may allocate a resource and then free it,
and a unforced thunk to that resource could result in reading memory
that has since been overwritten by something else, or in a SEGV,
depending. While that seems kind of like a bug in ResourceT to me, if it
is what's happening, this will avoid it. If it's not, this doesn't
really hurt much since the values are all smallish.
This commit was sponsored by Graham Spencer on Patreon.
So these special remotes are always supported.
IIRC these build flags were added because the dep chains were a bit too
long, or perhaps because the libraries were not available in Debian stable,
or something like that. That was long ago, those reasons no longer apply,
and users get confused when builtin special remotes are not available, so
it seems best to remove the build flags now.
If this does cause a problem it can be reverted of course..
This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
Works better with automatic merge conflict resolution than git's ususual
default of "conflict".
This is not done when automatic merge conflict resolution is disabled.
This commit was sponsored by Mark Reidenbach on Patreon.
Make all calls to git merge go through autoMergeFrom, in preparation
for fine-tuning git merge's config for automatic merge conflict
resolution.
This commit was sponsored by Ryan Newton on Patreon.
This case was handled by cleanConflictCruft, but only when the annexed
file's object was present. When not present, it left the annexed file
with the original name, not checked into git, while adding the variant
file. So, add an explicit deletion of the deleted file in this case.
My specific case where this happened actually involves
merge.directoryRenames=conflict. After a merge involving that,
the situation was the file appears as "added by them", because that
caused the file that they added to be moved into a directory we renamed.
That case is the same as them adding a modified version of the file,
while we deleted it. (Except for the history of the file, since it's a
new file, but this doesn't look at history.)
This commit was sponsored by Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. on Patreon.
This does not actually change how the merge conflict is resolved when
one side deleted the file, but it was not documented before, and I think
it only worked by accident.
This commit was sponsored by Brett Eisenberg on Patreon.
