When concurrency is enabled, there can be worker threads still running
when the time limit is checked. Exiting right there does not
give those threads time to finish what they're doing. Instead, the seeking
is wrapped up, and git-annex then shuts down cleanly.
The whole point of --time-limit existing, rather than using timeout(1)
when running git-annex is to let git-annex finish the action(s) it is
working on when the time limit is reached, and shut down cleanly.
I noticed this problem when investigating why restagePointerFile might
not have run after get/drop of an unlocked file. With --time-limit -J,
a worker thread may have finished updating a work tree file, and be killed
by the time limit check before it can run restagePointerFile. So despite
--time-limit running the shutdown actions, the work tree file didn't get
restaged.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
It's hard to know what's a good default for this. But 1 mb seems way too
small, because it's very easy for a git pull or some similar operation
that we don't think of as using much space to use up 1 mb of space.
Most people would want to free up some space if a filesystem only had 100
mb free. But on a small VPS, it's probably not uncommon to have only 1 gb
free. So 1 gb is too large for annex.diskreserve.
While old 1 gb USB keys are around, it's unlikely that anyone is
relying on them to shuttle annex data around; it would be worth anyone's
time to upgrade to a 32 gb or larger cheap modern USB key ($5).
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Fix a reversion that prevented git-annex from working in a repository when
--git-dir or GIT_DIR is specified to relocate the git directory to
somewhere else. (Introduced in version 10.20220525)
checkRepoConfigInaccessible could still run git config --list, just passing
--git-dir. It seems not necessary, because I know that passing --git-dir
bypasses git's check for repo ownership. I suppose it might be that git
eventually changes to check something about the ownership of the working
tree, so passing --git-dir without --work-tree would still be worth doing.
But for now this is the simple fix.
Sponsored-by: Nicholas Golder-Manning on Patreon
Combined with commit 0ffc59d341, this
fixes the case where there are duplicate files on the special remote,
and the first gets modified/deleted, while the second is still present.
directory, adb: Fixed a bug when importtree=yes, and multiple files in the
special remote have the same content, that caused it to refuse to get a
file from the special remote, incorrectly complaining that it had changed,
due to only accepting the inode+mtime of one file (that was since modified
or deleted) and not accepting the inode+mtime of other duplicate files.
Sponsored-by: Max Thoursie on Patreon
This partly fixes an issue where there are duplicate files in the
special remote, and the first file gets swapped with another duplicate,
or deleted. The swap case is fixed by this, the deleted case will need
other changes.
This makes retrieveExportWithContentIdentifier take a list of allowed
ContentIdentifier, same as storeExportWithContentIdentifier,
removeExportWithContentIdentifier, and
checkPresentExportWithContentIdentifier.
Of the special remotes that support importtree, borg is a special case
and does not use content identifiers, S3 I assume can't get mixed up
like this, directory certainly has the problem, and adb also appears to
have had the problem.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
Improve handling of directory special remotes with importtree=yes whose
ignoreinode setting has been changed. (By either enableremote or by
upgrading to commit 3e2f1f73cbc5fc10475745b3c3133267bd1850a7.)
When getting a file from such a remote, accept the content that would have
been accepted with the previous ignoreinode setting.
After a change to ignoreinode, importing a tree from the remote will
re-import and generate new content identifiers using the new config. So
when ignoreinode has changed to no, the inodes will be learned, and after
that point, a change in an inode will be detected as a change. Before
re-importing, a change in an inode will be ignored, as it was before the
ignoreinode change. This seems acceptble, because the user can re-import
immediately if they urgently need to add inodes. And if not, they'll
do it sometime, presumably, and the change will take effect then.
Sponsored-by: Erik Bjäreholt on Patreon
