Fix some cases where handling of keys with extensions varied depending on
the locale.
A filename with a unicode extension would before generate a key with an
extension in a unicode locale, but not in LANG=C, because the extension
was not all alphanumeric. Also the the length of the extension could be
counted differently depending on the locale.
In a non-unicode locale, git-annex migrate would see that the extension
was not all alphanumeric and want to "upgrade" it. Now that doesn't happen.
As far as backwards compatability, this does mean that unicode
extensions are counted by the number of bytes, not number of characters.
So, if someone is using unicode extensions, they may find git-annex
stops using them when adding files, because their extensions are too
long. Keys already in their repo with the "too long" extensions will
still work though, so this only prevents adding the same content with
the same extension generating the same key. Documented this by
documenting that annex.maxextensionlength is a number of bytes.
Also, if a filename has an extension that is not valid utf-8 and the
locale is utf-8, the extension will be allowed now, and an old
git-annex, in the same locale would not, and would also want to
"upgrade" that.
Unfortunately, cabal puts the binary in a very complicated path
and does not provide any good way to get it out, leaving no good choice
except to use find.
It may be possible to use cabal (new-)install --symlink-bindir,
and ask it to symlink to pwd, but with my older version of cabal,
that does not work.
The stack branch will probably also break once it uses a newer cabal,
didn't try to deal with that.
remoteAnnexConfig will avoid bugs like
a3a674d15b
Use now more generic remoteConfig in a couple places that built
non-annex config settings manually before.
That was added back in 2013 commit 2af652e1b8
and I'm a bit unclear about the reasons.
It seemed that, at the time, receive.denyNonFastforwards=true, which is
the default in a repo created by git init --shared --bare (but not
without --shared), which the assistant did, caused problems syncing.
But even at the time the bug report showed an error message clearly
explaining that it was a non-fast-forward push being denied.
I tried it with the current version, and since git-annex sync pulls
from the bare repo and merges, it pushes a fast-forward. So there's no
failure to push. (There could be one if another push happened after the
pull, but you'd want it to fail then presumably.)
I'm not 100% sure what changed to make it not be a problem, but I know
I've seen this message in many circumstances and I can't ever recall it
having anything to do with any issue that prevented a push.
Based on doc/forum/non_fast_forward_error_with_git_annex_sync.mdwn,
which showed the problem when syncing from a direct mode repo,
and on doc/forum/receiving_indirect_renames_on_direct_repo___63__/comment_3_0246fff6c7c75f6be45bd257ec3872a5._comment
which seems to show the problem was actually a problem pulling,
I think there's a good chance that the problem actually involved direct
mode.
