May be unlocked files pulled from elsewhere, but converting from direct
mode will add more. So, do the scan for them first, since it empties
anything currently in the database.
WorkTree.lookupFile was finding a key for a file that's deleted from the
work tree, which is different than the v5 behavior (though perhaps the same
as the direct mode behavior). Fix by checking that the work tree file exists
before catting its key.
Hopefully this won't slow down much, probably the catKey is much more expensive.
I can't see any way to optimise this, except perhaps to make Command.Unused
check if work tree files exist before/after calling lookupFile. But,
it seems better to make lookupFile really only find keys for worktree files;
that's what it's intended to do.
Else, queued file stages won't have reached the index, and it won't find
everthing.
This evidently fixes a reversion in my work today, although I don't see how
I broke it. It didn't use to flush the queue first, before, and worked
somehow.
Test suite for v5 is back to 100% green now.
The smudge filter does need to be run, because if the key is in the local
annex already (due to renaming, or a copy of a file added, or a new file
added and its content has already arrived), git merge smudges the file and
this should provide its content.
This does probably mean that in merge conflict resolution, git smudges the
existing file, re-copying all its content to it, and then the file is
deleted. So, not efficient.
This is a behavior change for merge conflicts between locked files
that both pointed to the same key, in different ways.
Before, the conflict was resolved, but the file was renamed to .variant.
This was unnecessary, because there was only one variant.
Of course, this also handles conflicts between unlocked and locked, or even
two unlocked files with different pointer contents.
Since the file was present and locked, its annex object was not in the
inode cache. So, despite not needing to update the annex object when the
clean filter is run on the content by git merge, it does need to record the
inode cache of the annex object. Otherwise, the annex object will be
assumed to be bad, since its inode is not cached.
