Linking the file to the tmp dir was not necessary in the clean
filter, and it caused the ctime to change, which caused git to think
the file was changed. This caused git status to get slow as it kept
re-cleaning unchanged files.
Fixes several bugs with updates of pointer files. When eg, running
git annex drop --from localremote
it was updating the pointer file in the local repository, not the remote.
Also, fixes drop ../foo when run in a subdir, and probably lots of other
problems. Test suite drops from ~30 to 11 failures now.
TopFilePath is used to force thinking about what the filepath is relative
to.
The data stored in the sqlite db is still just a plain string, and
TopFilePath is a newtype, so there's no overhead involved in using it in
DataBase.Keys.
WorkTree.lookupFile was finding a key for a file that's deleted from the
work tree, which is different than the v5 behavior (though perhaps the same
as the direct mode behavior). Fix by checking that the work tree file exists
before catting its key.
Hopefully this won't slow down much, probably the catKey is much more expensive.
I can't see any way to optimise this, except perhaps to make Command.Unused
check if work tree files exist before/after calling lookupFile. But,
it seems better to make lookupFile really only find keys for worktree files;
that's what it's intended to do.
Else, queued file stages won't have reached the index, and it won't find
everthing.
This evidently fixes a reversion in my work today, although I don't see how
I broke it. It didn't use to flush the queue first, before, and worked
somehow.
Test suite for v5 is back to 100% green now.
The smudge filter does need to be run, because if the key is in the local
annex already (due to renaming, or a copy of a file added, or a new file
added and its content has already arrived), git merge smudges the file and
this should provide its content.
This does probably mean that in merge conflict resolution, git smudges the
existing file, re-copying all its content to it, and then the file is
deleted. So, not efficient.
This is a behavior change for merge conflicts between locked files
that both pointed to the same key, in different ways.
Before, the conflict was resolved, but the file was renamed to .variant.
This was unnecessary, because there was only one variant.
Of course, this also handles conflicts between unlocked and locked, or even
two unlocked files with different pointer contents.
Since the file was present and locked, its annex object was not in the
inode cache. So, despite not needing to update the annex object when the
clean filter is run on the content by git merge, it does need to record the
inode cache of the annex object. Otherwise, the annex object will be
assumed to be bad, since its inode is not cached.
Several tricky parts:
* When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked,
the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case.
* Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames
an unlocked file.
* git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually
overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so
invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's
safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to
compare their entire contents.
Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file
when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being
run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new
content into place.
* Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked
file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying
the content to a new worktree file.
This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but
due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually
seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and
rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused.
So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be.
If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate
worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the
direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and
I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
Decided it's too scary to make v6 unlocked files have 1 copy by default,
but that should be available to those who need it. This is consistent with
git-annex not dropping unused content without --force, etc.
* Added annex.thin setting, which makes unlocked files in v6 repositories
be hard linked to their content, instead of a copy. This saves disk
space but means any modification of an unlocked file will lose the local
(and possibly only) copy of the old version.
* Enable annex.thin by default on upgrade from direct mode to v6, since
direct mode made the same tradeoff.
* fix: Adjusts unlocked files as configured by annex.thin.
This optimisation was not necessary, and didn't work for v6 unlocked files.
Typically only a small number of files will be changed by a commit, so just
catKey them all.
This can happen when ingesting a new file in either locked or unlocked
mode, when some unlocked files in the repo use the same key, and the
content was not locally available before.
This fixes a race where the modified file ended up in annex/objects, and
the InodeCache stored in the database was for the modified version, so
git-annex didn't know it had gotten modified.
The race could occur when the smudge filter was running; now it gets the
InodeCache before generating the Key, which avoids the race.
In v5, lookupFile is supposed to only look at symlinks on disk (except when
in direct mode).
Note that v6 also has a bug when a locked file's symlink is deleted and is
replaced with a new file. It sees that a link is staged and gets that
key.
The problem is that shutdown is not always called, particularly in the test
suite. So, a database connection would be opened, possibly some changes
queued, and then not shut down.
One way this can happen is when using Annex.eval or Annex.run with a new
state. A better fix might be to make both of them call Keys.shutdown
(and be sure to do it even if the annex action threw an error).
Complication: Sometimes they're run reusing an existing state, so shutting
down a database connection could cause problems for other users of that
same state. I think this would need a MVar holding the database handle,
so it could be emptied once shut down, and another user of the database
connection could then start up a new one if it got shut down. But, what if
2 threads were concurrently using the same database handle and one shut it
down while the other was writing to it? Urgh.
Might have to go that route eventually to get the database access to run
fast enough. For now, a quick fix to get the test suite happier, at the
expense of speed.
This covers the case where multiple files have the same content and are
added with git add. Previously only the one that was linked to the annex
got its inode cached; now both are.
When a v6 unlocked files is removed from the work tree,
unused doesn't show it. When it gets removed from the index,
unused does show it. This is the same as a locked file.
If multiple files point to the same annex object, the user may want to
modify them independently, so don't use a hard link.
Also, check diskreserve when copying.
Before the smudge filter added a trailing newline, but other things that
wrote formatPointer to a file did not.
also some new pointer staging code to use later
This avoids querying the database when the content file doen't exist
(or otherwise fails the provided check). However, it does add overhead of
querying the database, and will certianly impact performance.
The Keys database can hold multiple inode caches for a given key. One for
the annex object, and one for each pointer file, which may not be hard
linked to it.
Inode caches for a key are recorded when its content is added to the annex,
but only if it has known pointer files. This is to avoid the overhead of
maintaining the database when not needed.
When the smudge filter outputs a file's content, the inode cache is not
updated, because git's smudge interface doesn't let us write the file. So,
dropping will fall back to doing an expensive verification then. Ideally,
git's interface would be improved, and then the inode cache could be
updated then too.
Renamed the db to keys, since it is various info about a Keys.
Dropping a key will update its pointer files, as long as their content can
be verified to be unmodified. This falls back to checksum verification, but
I want it to use an InodeCache of the key, for speed. But, I have not made
anything populate that cache yet.
