Added a comment: indirect vs direct
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdb4a1e0a7
commit
eddf388162
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="http://grossmeier.net/"
|
||||||
|
nickname="greg"
|
||||||
|
subject="indirect vs direct"
|
||||||
|
date="2014-02-20T06:25:31Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
Aha! The issue is that the first repo (the one not copying unused files to synology) was in direct mode. I switched it to indirect and not only are there now a lot more files listed in unused, but copy --unused is working as expected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Should there be a warning in git-annex unused when in direct mode about this? I'm not exactly sure what is happening (not sure why the number of unused would go up from 91 to 296).
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue