From eddf3881625dfc4a65763f30e8b4305745fb8c38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://grossmeier.net/" Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:25:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: indirect vs direct --- ...comment_1_a11a45868867361fcff61471ffe0ce39._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/copy_unused_and_unused_not_agreeing/comment_1_a11a45868867361fcff61471ffe0ce39._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/copy_unused_and_unused_not_agreeing/comment_1_a11a45868867361fcff61471ffe0ce39._comment b/doc/bugs/copy_unused_and_unused_not_agreeing/comment_1_a11a45868867361fcff61471ffe0ce39._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..cedc0f7f9a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/copy_unused_and_unused_not_agreeing/comment_1_a11a45868867361fcff61471ffe0ce39._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://grossmeier.net/" + nickname="greg" + subject="indirect vs direct" + date="2014-02-20T06:25:31Z" + content=""" +Aha! The issue is that the first repo (the one not copying unused files to synology) was in direct mode. I switched it to indirect and not only are there now a lot more files listed in unused, but copy --unused is working as expected. + +Should there be a warning in git-annex unused when in direct mode about this? I'm not exactly sure what is happening (not sure why the number of unused would go up from 91 to 296). +"""]]