Added a comment: indirect vs direct

This commit is contained in:
http://grossmeier.net/ 2014-02-20 06:25:32 +00:00 committed by admin
parent cdb4a1e0a7
commit eddf388162

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://grossmeier.net/"
nickname="greg"
subject="indirect vs direct"
date="2014-02-20T06:25:31Z"
content="""
Aha! The issue is that the first repo (the one not copying unused files to synology) was in direct mode. I switched it to indirect and not only are there now a lot more files listed in unused, but copy --unused is working as expected.
Should there be a warning in git-annex unused when in direct mode about this? I'm not exactly sure what is happening (not sure why the number of unused would go up from 91 to 296).
"""]]