mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2013-11-04 14:35:36 -04:00
commit a0cb927a76
3 changed files with 39 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/bugs/git-annex-shell:_gcryptsetup_permission_denied/comment_6_76ccdf0542e76e4dbd61f3b3228d40ba._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joeyh.name/"
ip="209.250.56.47"
subject="comment 6"
date="2013-11-04T17:12:05Z"
content="""
It's entirely normal for `git annex get --from remote` to skip files that it does not think are present on the remote.
What does `git annex whereis` say?
"""]]

15
doc/tips/fully_encrypted_git_repositories_with_gcrypt/comment_10_4440a80d64c60c7312d5c405d54e607a._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="tanen"
ip="83.128.159.25"
subject="comment 10"
date="2013-11-04T17:58:36Z"
content="""
> \"We could symetrically encrypt the repository with a keyfile that's stored in the repository itself\"
> Then you would need to decrypt the repository in order get the key you need to decrypt the repository. The impossibility of this design is why I didn't do that!
Sorry, I ment that the file containing the symmetric encryption key should obviously not be used to encrypt itself, it would be stored in the repository \"unencrypted\" (but protected with a passphrase)
> store a non-encrypted gpg key alongside the repsitory encrypted with it, but then you have to rely on a passphrase for all your security.
Exactly. I think such a mode be a great addition. It might not be as secure as encryption based on a private key - depending on the passphrase strength -, but it would certainly be a lot more convenient and portable (and still much more secure than the shared encryption method).
"""]]

14
doc/tips/fully_encrypted_git_repositories_with_gcrypt/comment_9_3784e0c828cd60b6a9075c2d32d070cc._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joeyh.name/"
ip="209.250.56.47"
subject="comment 9"
date="2013-11-04T17:07:55Z"
content="""
\"We could symetrically encrypt the repository with a keyfile that's stored in the repository itself\"
Then you would need to decrypt the repository in order get the key you need to decrypt the repository. The impossibility of this design is why I didn't do that!
It would certianly be possible to store a non-encrypted gpg key alongside the repsitory encrypted with it, but then you have to rely on a passphrase for all your security.
You should file a bug report for the bug you saw..
"""]]