Added a comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
d0a48ac2da
commit
26b4e5af3e
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="tanen"
|
||||
ip="83.128.159.25"
|
||||
subject="comment 10"
|
||||
date="2013-11-04T17:58:36Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
> \"We could symetrically encrypt the repository with a keyfile that's stored in the repository itself\"
|
||||
> Then you would need to decrypt the repository in order get the key you need to decrypt the repository. The impossibility of this design is why I didn't do that!
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry, I ment that the file containing the symmetric encryption key should obviously not be used to encrypt itself, it would be stored in the repository \"unencrypted\" (but protected with a passphrase)
|
||||
|
||||
> store a non-encrypted gpg key alongside the repsitory encrypted with it, but then you have to rely on a passphrase for all your security.
|
||||
|
||||
Exactly. I think such a mode be a great addition. It might not be as secure as encryption based on a private key - depending on the passphrase strength -, but it would certainly be a lot more convenient and portable (and still much more secure than the shared encryption method).
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue