mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlScsufvQF7s8TVTwPd-h_QiP5Hn_i-hrs 2014-07-21 18:37:20 +00:00 • committed by admin
parent 9b4f745aeb
commit 9082d4f18f
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/todo/wishlist:_--maxdepth_option_for_git_annex_find/comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlScsufvQF7s8TVTwPd-h_QiP5Hn_i-hrs"
nickname="Jason"
subject="comment 2"
date="2014-07-21T18:37:19Z"
content="""
I see your point, `git ls-files` may still have to walk the whole tree, precluding a speed advantage.
But I guess the point of what I was saying was more that a way summarize from a high level what is here and what is not would be nice.
I certainly understand if this is not something you see as worthwhile, but if someone were inclined to write a patch (if ever I find the time) that would add a `--maxdepth` option that would merely summarize the results of `git annex find` would it be something you would be inclined to include in the main repo (providing, of course, that you find the behavior sensible)?
"""]]