From 9082d4f18f0002e56947c3be4ed12c2112f920d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlScsufvQF7s8TVTwPd-h_QiP5Hn_i-hrs" Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:37:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/wishlist:_--maxdepth_option_for_git_annex_find/comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_--maxdepth_option_for_git_annex_find/comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment b/doc/todo/wishlist:_--maxdepth_option_for_git_annex_find/comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..944f36088e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/wishlist:_--maxdepth_option_for_git_annex_find/comment_2_da30a066c4de465fe172ad01057e2380._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlScsufvQF7s8TVTwPd-h_QiP5Hn_i-hrs" + nickname="Jason" + subject="comment 2" + date="2014-07-21T18:37:19Z" + content=""" +I see your point, `git ls-files` may still have to walk the whole tree, precluding a speed advantage. +But I guess the point of what I was saying was more that a way summarize from a high level what is here and what is not would be nice. +I certainly understand if this is not something you see as worthwhile, but if someone were inclined to write a patch (if ever I find the time) that would add a `--maxdepth` option that would merely summarize the results of `git annex find` would it be something you would be inclined to include in the main repo (providing, of course, that you find the behavior sensible)? +"""]]