Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
This commit is contained in:
commit
88b3ee8968
3 changed files with 30 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="antymat"
|
||||
ip="77.190.74.127"
|
||||
subject="comment 2"
|
||||
date="2012-02-14T22:48:37Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Thanks, joey, but I still do not know, why the file that has been (and *is*) OK according to separate sha1 and sha256 checks, has been marked 'bad' by `fsck` and moved to `.git/annex/bad`. What could be a reason for that? Could have `rsync` caused it? I know too little about internal workings of `git-annex` to answer this question.
|
||||
|
||||
But one thing I know for certain - the false positives should *not* happen, unless something *is* wrong with the file. Otherwise, if it is unreliable, if I have to check twice, it is useless. I might as well just keep checksums of all the files and do all checks by hand...
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
|
||||
nickname="joey"
|
||||
subject="comment 3"
|
||||
date="2012-02-14T22:57:29Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
All that git annex fsck does is checksum the file and move it away if the checksum fails.
|
||||
|
||||
If bad data was somehow read from the disk that one time, what you describe could occur. I cannot think of any other way it could happen.
|
||||
"""]]
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="antymat"
|
||||
ip="77.190.74.127"
|
||||
subject="comment 4"
|
||||
date="2012-02-15T07:13:12Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
OK, thanks. I was just wondering - since there are links in git(-annex), and a hard links too, that maybe the issue has been caused by `rsync`.
|
||||
|
||||
I will keep my eye on that and run checks with my own checksum and `fsck` from time to time, and see what happens. I will post my results here, but the whole run (`fsck` or checksum) takes almost 2 days, so I will not do it too often... ;)
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue