diff --git a/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_2_f51c53f3f6e6ee1ad463992657db5828._comment b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_2_f51c53f3f6e6ee1ad463992657db5828._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1e0111e672
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_2_f51c53f3f6e6ee1ad463992657db5828._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="antymat"
+ ip="77.190.74.127"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2012-02-14T22:48:37Z"
+ content="""
+Thanks, joey, but I still do not know, why the file that has been (and *is*) OK according to separate sha1 and sha256 checks, has been marked 'bad' by `fsck` and moved to `.git/annex/bad`. What could be a reason for that? Could have `rsync` caused it? I know too little about internal workings of `git-annex` to answer this question.
+
+But one thing I know for certain - the false positives should *not* happen, unless something *is* wrong with the file. Otherwise, if it is unreliable, if I have to check twice, it is useless. I might as well just keep checksums of all the files and do all checks by hand...
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_3_692d6d4cd2f75a497e7d314041a768d2._comment b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_3_692d6d4cd2f75a497e7d314041a768d2._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bd807f4048
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_3_692d6d4cd2f75a497e7d314041a768d2._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2012-02-14T22:57:29Z"
+ content="""
+All that git annex fsck does is checksum the file and move it away if the checksum fails. 
+
+If bad data was somehow read from the disk that one time, what you describe could occur. I cannot think of any other way it could happen.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_4_7ceb395bf8a2e6a041ccd8de63b1b6eb._comment b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_4_7ceb395bf8a2e6a041ccd8de63b1b6eb._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..038d41620c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/fsck_gives_false_positives/comment_4_7ceb395bf8a2e6a041ccd8de63b1b6eb._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="antymat"
+ ip="77.190.74.127"
+ subject="comment 4"
+ date="2012-02-15T07:13:12Z"
+ content="""
+OK, thanks. I was just wondering - since there are links in git(-annex), and a hard links too, that maybe the issue has been caused by `rsync`.
+
+I will keep my eye on that and run checks with my own checksum and `fsck` from time to time, and see what happens. I will post my results here, but the whole run (`fsck` or checksum) takes almost 2 days, so I will not do it too often... ;)
+"""]]