Added a comment: why not mimetypes for preferred content?
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3148c4313
commit
7fc51f338c
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="https://openid.stackexchange.com/user/27ceb3c5-0762-42b8-8f8a-ed21c284748f"
|
||||||
|
nickname="g"
|
||||||
|
subject="why not mimetypes for preferred content?"
|
||||||
|
date="2016-03-28T08:32:45Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
Why does matching by mimetype only make sense for annex.largefiles, but not for preferred content expressions? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but it seems it would in fact be quite useful to easily express that, for example, a certain repo have a preference for my photos and not my music files (though both should be considered large files)
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue