From 7fc51f338c127e2df12fadb6eb538fb8bbe0ed50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://openid.stackexchange.com/user/27ceb3c5-0762-42b8-8f8a-ed21c284748f" Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:32:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: why not mimetypes for preferred content? --- .../comment_3_bf44404de52b00ff4e4f1effd4cef336._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/devblog/day_360__annex.largefiles_mimetype/comment_3_bf44404de52b00ff4e4f1effd4cef336._comment diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_360__annex.largefiles_mimetype/comment_3_bf44404de52b00ff4e4f1effd4cef336._comment b/doc/devblog/day_360__annex.largefiles_mimetype/comment_3_bf44404de52b00ff4e4f1effd4cef336._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e7f4f40549 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_360__annex.largefiles_mimetype/comment_3_bf44404de52b00ff4e4f1effd4cef336._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://openid.stackexchange.com/user/27ceb3c5-0762-42b8-8f8a-ed21c284748f" + nickname="g" + subject="why not mimetypes for preferred content?" + date="2016-03-28T08:32:45Z" + content=""" +Why does matching by mimetype only make sense for annex.largefiles, but not for preferred content expressions? Sorry if this is a stupid question, but it seems it would in fact be quite useful to easily express that, for example, a certain repo have a preference for my photos and not my music files (though both should be considered large files) +"""]]