Added a comment

This commit is contained in:
yarikoptic 2018-11-15 20:43:27 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 615cbf5ffe
commit 4238064600

View file

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="yarikoptic"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
subject="comment 16"
date="2018-11-15T20:43:27Z"
content="""
woohoo `git bisect run ~/bisect-git-annex ~/git-annex-dev.img ~/bisect-git-annex-lock.sh` (on `git bisect start HEAD 6.20180926` with HEAD being 05bfce7ca8e67612c66e2cdb3c7c0c26fd8c5243 finished with ground breaking discovery
[[!format sh \"\"\"
2c0300c8b9cd97b7d2a86e48e19283be8c9ef278 is the first bad commit
commit 2c0300c8b9cd97b7d2a86e48e19283be8c9ef278
Author: Ilya_Shlyakhter <Ilya_Shlyakhter@web>
Date: Wed Sep 26 17:16:13 2018 +0000
Added a comment: question about special remote protocol
:040000 040000 6e8d46c0b393e4b96ff53f28224154939fbe4883 e9db3cc46114d98fe77bf0392d8a90c314c9326e M doc
bisect run success
\"\"\"]]
so it is all destructive Ilya's comments! ;)
That is a commit right after the 6.20180926 which I chose as \"good\" since the good was the 6.20180926-gc906aaf (installed via conda build pl5.22.2.1_0).
So may be the problem is not in git annex per se but in its build-depends, which changed in buster (I've been building standalones with buster for a while).
I will try to do manual comparison across a number of builds from datalad.
"""]]