2016-07-28 19:10:04 +00:00 · 2016-07-28 19:10:04 +00:00 · 01898863df
commit 01898863df
parent 908979c0de
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/doc/todo/39info_filename39_to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/39info_filename39_to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn
@ -0,0 +1 @@
+ATM in DataLad we rely on 'git annex find' to determine either files have content locally.  Even though it could be used in a batch mode, I wondered if we could may be just use 'annex info' to obtain information either a file (or a key) has content locally?  Another benefit would be is that within single command output we could determine also if a file under annex or not (instead of first doing e.g. 'info' to figure out if under annex and then 'find' again to figure out if content is present locally)
				`@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				ATM in DataLad we rely on 'git annex find' to determine either files have content locally. Even though it could be used in a batch mode, I wondered if we could may be just use 'annex info' to obtain information either a file (or a key) has content locally? Another benefit would be is that within single command output we could determine also if a file under annex or not (instead of first doing e.g. 'info' to figure out if under annex and then 'find' again to figure out if content is present locally)