From 01898863df414add43434f41f2644b09f6568163 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:10:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- ...to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn b/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..05737f6219 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/__39__info_filename__39___to_provide_information_either_content_is_locally_present.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ATM in DataLad we rely on 'git annex find' to determine either files have content locally. Even though it could be used in a batch mode, I wondered if we could may be just use 'annex info' to obtain information either a file (or a key) has content locally? Another benefit would be is that within single command output we could determine also if a file under annex or not (instead of first doing e.g. 'info' to figure out if under annex and then 'find' again to figure out if content is present locally)