2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{- Persistent sqlite database handles.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- Copyright 2015 Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- Licensed under the GNU GPL version 3 or higher.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
|
allow for concurrent incremental fsck processes again (sorta)
Sqlite doesn't support multiple concurrent writers
at all. One of them will fail to write. It's not even possible to have two
processes building up separate transactions at the same time. Before using
sqlite, incremental fsck could work perfectly well with multiple fsck
processes running concurrently. I'd like to keep that working.
My partial solution, so far, is to make git-annex buffer writes, and every
so often send them all to sqlite at once, in a transaction. So most of the
time, nothing is writing to the database. (And if it gets unlucky and
a write fails due to a collision with another writer, it can just wait and
retry the write later.) This lets multiple processes write to the database
successfully.
But, for the purposes of concurrent, incremental fsck, it's not ideal.
Each process doesn't immediately learn of files that another process has
checked. So they'll tend to do redundant work.
Only way I can see to improve this is to use some other mechanism for
short-term IPC between the fsck processes. Not yet done.
----
Also, make addDb check if an item is in the database already, and not try
to re-add it. That fixes an intermittent crash with
"SQLite3 returned ErrorConstraint while attempting to perform step."
I am not 100% sure why; it only started happening when I moved write
buffering into the queue. It seemed to generally happen on the same file
each time, so could just be due to multiple files having the same key.
However, I doubt my sound repo has many duplicate keys, and I suspect
something else is going on.
----
Updated benchmark, with the 1000 item queue: 6m33.808s
2015-02-17 20:39:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
module Database.Handle (
|
|
|
|
DbHandle,
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
initDb,
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
openDb,
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
TableName,
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
queryDb,
|
2015-02-16 20:04:23 +00:00
|
|
|
closeDb,
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
commitDb,
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
commitDb',
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
) where
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import Utility.Exception
|
2015-12-23 22:34:51 +00:00
|
|
|
import Utility.FileSystemEncoding
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
allow for concurrent incremental fsck processes again (sorta)
Sqlite doesn't support multiple concurrent writers
at all. One of them will fail to write. It's not even possible to have two
processes building up separate transactions at the same time. Before using
sqlite, incremental fsck could work perfectly well with multiple fsck
processes running concurrently. I'd like to keep that working.
My partial solution, so far, is to make git-annex buffer writes, and every
so often send them all to sqlite at once, in a transaction. So most of the
time, nothing is writing to the database. (And if it gets unlucky and
a write fails due to a collision with another writer, it can just wait and
retry the write later.) This lets multiple processes write to the database
successfully.
But, for the purposes of concurrent, incremental fsck, it's not ideal.
Each process doesn't immediately learn of files that another process has
checked. So they'll tend to do redundant work.
Only way I can see to improve this is to use some other mechanism for
short-term IPC between the fsck processes. Not yet done.
----
Also, make addDb check if an item is in the database already, and not try
to re-add it. That fixes an intermittent crash with
"SQLite3 returned ErrorConstraint while attempting to perform step."
I am not 100% sure why; it only started happening when I moved write
buffering into the queue. It seemed to generally happen on the same file
each time, so could just be due to multiple files having the same key.
However, I doubt my sound repo has many duplicate keys, and I suspect
something else is going on.
----
Updated benchmark, with the 1000 item queue: 6m33.808s
2015-02-17 20:39:35 +00:00
|
|
|
import Database.Persist.Sqlite
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
import qualified Database.Sqlite as Sqlite
|
2015-02-16 20:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
import Control.Monad
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
import Control.Monad.IO.Class (liftIO)
|
|
|
|
import Control.Concurrent
|
|
|
|
import Control.Concurrent.Async
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
import Control.Exception (throwIO, BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar(..))
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
import qualified Data.Text as T
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
import Control.Monad.Trans.Resource (runResourceT)
|
|
|
|
import Control.Monad.Logger (runNoLoggingT)
|
|
|
|
import Data.List
|
2015-12-09 18:55:47 +00:00
|
|
|
import System.IO
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{- A DbHandle is a reference to a worker thread that communicates with
|
|
|
|
- the database. It has a MVar which Jobs are submitted to. -}
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
data DbHandle = DbHandle (Async ()) (MVar Job)
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{- Ensures that the database is initialized. Pass the migration action for
|
|
|
|
- the database.
|
|
|
|
-
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
- The database is initialized using WAL mode, to prevent readers
|
|
|
|
- from blocking writers, and prevent a writer from blocking readers.
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
-}
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
initDb :: FilePath -> SqlPersistM () -> IO ()
|
|
|
|
initDb f migration = do
|
|
|
|
let db = T.pack f
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
enableWAL db
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
runSqlite db migration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enableWAL :: T.Text -> IO ()
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
enableWAL db = do
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
conn <- Sqlite.open db
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
stmt <- Sqlite.prepare conn (T.pack "PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL;")
|
|
|
|
void $ Sqlite.step stmt
|
|
|
|
void $ Sqlite.finalize stmt
|
|
|
|
Sqlite.close conn
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{- Name of a table that should exist once the database is initialized. -}
|
|
|
|
type TableName = String
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-18 19:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{- Opens the database, but does not perform any migrations. Only use
|
|
|
|
- if the database is known to exist and have the right tables. -}
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
openDb :: FilePath -> TableName -> IO DbHandle
|
|
|
|
openDb db tablename = do
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
jobs <- newEmptyMVar
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
worker <- async (workerThread (T.pack db) tablename jobs)
|
2015-12-23 22:34:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- work around https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent/issues/474
|
|
|
|
liftIO setConsoleEncoding
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return $ DbHandle worker jobs
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{- This is optional; when the DbHandle gets garbage collected it will
|
|
|
|
- auto-close. -}
|
2015-12-23 18:59:58 +00:00
|
|
|
closeDb :: DbHandle -> IO ()
|
|
|
|
closeDb (DbHandle worker jobs) = do
|
|
|
|
putMVar jobs CloseJob
|
|
|
|
wait worker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{- Makes a query using the DbHandle. This should not be used to make
|
|
|
|
- changes to the database!
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- Note that the action is not run by the calling thread, but by a
|
|
|
|
- worker thread. Exceptions are propigated to the calling thread.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- Only one action can be run at a time against a given DbHandle.
|
|
|
|
- If called concurrently in the same process, this will block until
|
|
|
|
- it is able to run.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
queryDb :: DbHandle -> SqlPersistM a -> IO a
|
|
|
|
queryDb (DbHandle _ jobs) a = do
|
|
|
|
res <- newEmptyMVar
|
|
|
|
putMVar jobs $ QueryJob $
|
|
|
|
liftIO . putMVar res =<< tryNonAsync a
|
|
|
|
(either throwIO return =<< takeMVar res)
|
|
|
|
`catchNonAsync` (const $ error "sqlite query crashed")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{- Writes a change to the database.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- If a database is opened multiple times and there's a concurrent writer,
|
|
|
|
- the write could fail. Retries repeatedly for up to 10 seconds,
|
|
|
|
- which should avoid all but the most exceptional problems.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
commitDb :: DbHandle -> SqlPersistM () -> IO ()
|
|
|
|
commitDb h wa = robustly Nothing 100 (commitDb' h wa)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
robustly :: Maybe SomeException -> Int -> IO (Either SomeException ()) -> IO ()
|
|
|
|
robustly e 0 _ = error $ "failed to commit changes to sqlite database: " ++ show e
|
|
|
|
robustly _ n a = do
|
|
|
|
r <- a
|
|
|
|
case r of
|
|
|
|
Right _ -> return ()
|
|
|
|
Left e -> do
|
|
|
|
threadDelay 100000 -- 1/10th second
|
|
|
|
robustly (Just e) (n-1) a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commitDb' :: DbHandle -> SqlPersistM () -> IO (Either SomeException ())
|
|
|
|
commitDb' (DbHandle _ jobs) a = do
|
|
|
|
res <- newEmptyMVar
|
|
|
|
putMVar jobs $ ChangeJob $ \runner ->
|
|
|
|
liftIO $ putMVar res =<< tryNonAsync (runner a)
|
|
|
|
takeMVar res
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
data Job
|
|
|
|
= QueryJob (SqlPersistM ())
|
|
|
|
| ChangeJob ((SqlPersistM () -> IO ()) -> IO ())
|
|
|
|
| CloseJob
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
workerThread :: T.Text -> TableName -> MVar Job -> IO ()
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
workerThread db tablename jobs =
|
|
|
|
catchNonAsync (runSqliteRobustly tablename db loop) showerr
|
2015-02-16 19:08:29 +00:00
|
|
|
where
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
showerr e = hPutStrLn stderr $
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
"sqlite worker thread crashed: " ++ show e
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
getjob :: IO (Either BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar Job)
|
|
|
|
getjob = try $ takeMVar jobs
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
loop = do
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
job <- liftIO getjob
|
2015-02-22 18:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
case job of
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-- Exception is thrown when the MVar is garbage
|
|
|
|
-- collected, which means the whole DbHandle
|
|
|
|
-- is not used any longer. Shutdown cleanly.
|
|
|
|
Left BlockedIndefinitelyOnMVar -> return ()
|
|
|
|
Right CloseJob -> return ()
|
|
|
|
Right (QueryJob a) -> a >> loop
|
2015-02-18 18:11:27 +00:00
|
|
|
-- change is run in a separate database connection
|
|
|
|
-- since sqlite only supports a single writer at a
|
|
|
|
-- time, and it may crash the database connection
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Right (ChangeJob a) -> liftIO (a (runSqliteRobustly tablename db)) >> loop
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-23 20:11:36 +00:00
|
|
|
-- like runSqlite, but calls settle on the raw sql Connection.
|
|
|
|
runSqliteRobustly :: TableName -> T.Text -> (SqlPersistM a) -> IO a
|
|
|
|
runSqliteRobustly tablename db a = do
|
|
|
|
conn <- Sqlite.open db
|
|
|
|
settle conn
|
|
|
|
runResourceT $ runNoLoggingT $
|
|
|
|
withSqlConn (wrapConnection conn) $
|
|
|
|
runSqlConn a
|
|
|
|
where
|
2015-02-22 18:08:26 +00:00
|
|
|
-- Work around a bug in sqlite: New database connections can
|
|
|
|
-- sometimes take a while to become usable; select statements will
|
|
|
|
-- fail with ErrorBusy for some time. So, loop until a select
|
|
|
|
-- succeeds; once one succeeds the connection will stay usable.
|
|
|
|
-- <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/93116>
|
|
|
|
settle conn = do
|
|
|
|
r <- tryNonAsync $ do
|
|
|
|
stmt <- Sqlite.prepare conn nullselect
|
|
|
|
void $ Sqlite.step stmt
|
|
|
|
void $ Sqlite.finalize stmt
|
|
|
|
case r of
|
|
|
|
Right _ -> return ()
|
|
|
|
Left e -> do
|
|
|
|
if "ErrorBusy" `isInfixOf` show e
|
|
|
|
then do
|
|
|
|
threadDelay 1000 -- 1/1000th second
|
|
|
|
settle conn
|
|
|
|
else throwIO e
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- This should succeed for any table.
|
|
|
|
nullselect = T.pack $ "SELECT null from " ++ tablename ++ " limit 1"
|