git-annex/Annex/AutoMerge.hs

313 lines
11 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

{- git-annex automatic merge conflict resolution
-
- Copyright 2012-2016 Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
-
- Licensed under the GNU GPL version 3 or higher.
-}
module Annex.AutoMerge
( autoMergeFrom
, resolveMerge
2014-07-11 20:59:49 +00:00
, commitResolvedMerge
) where
import Annex.Common
import qualified Annex.Queue
import Annex.Direct
import Annex.CatFile
import Annex.Link
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
import Annex.Content
import qualified Git.LsFiles as LsFiles
import qualified Git.UpdateIndex as UpdateIndex
import qualified Git.Merge
import qualified Git.Ref
import qualified Git
import qualified Git.Branch
import Git.Types (BlobType(..))
import Git.FilePath
import Config
import Annex.ReplaceFile
import Annex.VariantFile
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
import qualified Database.Keys
import Annex.InodeSentinal
import Utility.InodeCache
import qualified Data.Set as S
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
import qualified Data.Map as M
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
{- Merges from a branch into the current branch (which may not exist yet),
- with automatic merge conflict resolution.
-
- Callers should use Git.Branch.changed first, to make sure that
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
- there are changes from the current branch to the branch being merged in.
-}
2015-04-11 04:10:34 +00:00
autoMergeFrom :: Git.Ref -> Maybe Git.Ref -> Git.Branch.CommitMode -> Annex Bool
autoMergeFrom branch currbranch commitmode = do
showOutput
case currbranch of
Nothing -> go Nothing
Just b -> go =<< inRepo (Git.Ref.sha b)
where
go old = ifM isDirect
( mergeDirect currbranch old branch (resolveMerge old branch) commitmode
, inRepo (Git.Merge.mergeNonInteractive branch commitmode)
<||> (resolveMerge old branch <&&> commitResolvedMerge commitmode)
)
{- Resolves a conflicted merge. It's important that any conflicts be
- resolved in a way that itself avoids later merge conflicts, since
- multiple repositories may be doing this concurrently.
-
- Only merge conflicts where at least one side is an annexed file
- is resolved.
-
- This uses the Keys pointed to by the files to construct new
- filenames. So when both sides modified annexed file foo,
- it will be deleted, and replaced with files foo.variant-A and
- foo.variant-B.
-
- On the other hand, when one side deleted foo, and the other modified it,
- it will be deleted, and the modified version stored as file
- foo.variant-A (or B).
-
- It's also possible that one side has foo as an annexed file, and
- the other as a directory or non-annexed file. The annexed file
- is renamed to resolve the merge, and the other object is preserved as-is.
-
- In indirect mode, the merge is resolved in the work tree and files
- staged, to clean up from a conflicted merge that was run in the work
2014-06-10 00:32:11 +00:00
- tree.
-
2014-06-10 00:32:11 +00:00
- In direct mode, the work tree is not touched here; files are staged to
- the index, and written to the gitAnnexMergeDir, for later handling by
- the direct mode merge code.
-
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
- Unlocked files remain unlocked after merging, and locked files
- remain locked. When the merge conflict is between a locked and unlocked
- file, that otherwise point to the same content, the unlocked mode wins.
- This is done because only unlocked files work in filesystems that don't
- support symlinks.
-
- Returns false when there are no merge conflicts to resolve.
- A git merge can fail for other reasons, and this allows detecting
- such failures.
-}
resolveMerge :: Maybe Git.Ref -> Git.Ref -> Annex Bool
resolveMerge us them = do
top <- fromRepo Git.repoPath
(fs, cleanup) <- inRepo (LsFiles.unmerged [top])
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
srcmap <- inodeMap $ pure (map LsFiles.unmergedFile fs, return True)
(mergedks, mergedfs) <- unzip <$> mapM (resolveMerge' srcmap us them) fs
let mergedks' = concat mergedks
let mergedfs' = catMaybes mergedfs
let merged = not (null mergedfs')
void $ liftIO cleanup
unlessM isDirect $ do
(deleted, cleanup2) <- inRepo (LsFiles.deleted [top])
unless (null deleted) $
Annex.Queue.addCommand "rm"
[Param "--quiet", Param "-f", Param "--"]
deleted
void $ liftIO cleanup2
when merged $ do
Annex.Queue.flush
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
unlessM isDirect $ do
unstagedmap <- inodeMap $ inRepo $ LsFiles.notInRepo False [top]
cleanConflictCruft mergedks' mergedfs' unstagedmap
showLongNote "Merge conflict was automatically resolved; you may want to examine the result."
return merged
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
resolveMerge' :: InodeMap -> Maybe Git.Ref -> Git.Ref -> LsFiles.Unmerged -> Annex ([Key], Maybe FilePath)
resolveMerge' _ Nothing _ _ = return ([], Nothing)
resolveMerge' unstagedmap (Just us) them u = do
kus <- getkey LsFiles.valUs
kthem <- getkey LsFiles.valThem
case (kus, kthem) of
-- Both sides of conflict are annexed files
2014-03-05 02:55:40 +00:00
(Just keyUs, Just keyThem)
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
| keyUs /= keyThem -> resolveby [keyUs, keyThem] $ do
makeannexlink keyUs LsFiles.valUs
makeannexlink keyThem LsFiles.valThem
-- cleanConflictCruft can't handle unlocked
-- files, so delete here.
unless (islocked LsFiles.valUs) $
liftIO $ nukeFile file
| otherwise -> do
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
-- Only resolve using symlink when both
-- were locked, otherwise use unlocked
-- pointer.
-- In either case, keep original filename.
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
if islocked LsFiles.valUs && islocked LsFiles.valThem
then makesymlink keyUs file
else makepointer keyUs file
return ([keyUs, keyThem], Just file)
-- Our side is annexed file, other side is not.
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
(Just keyUs, Nothing) -> resolveby [keyUs] $ do
graftin them file LsFiles.valThem LsFiles.valThem LsFiles.valUs
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
makeannexlink keyUs LsFiles.valUs
-- Our side is not annexed file, other side is.
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
(Nothing, Just keyThem) -> resolveby [keyThem] $ do
graftin us file LsFiles.valUs LsFiles.valUs LsFiles.valThem
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
makeannexlink keyThem LsFiles.valThem
-- Neither side is annexed file; cannot resolve.
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
(Nothing, Nothing) -> return ([], Nothing)
where
file = LsFiles.unmergedFile u
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
getkey select =
case select (LsFiles.unmergedSha u) of
Just sha -> catKey sha
Nothing -> return Nothing
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
islocked select = select (LsFiles.unmergedBlobType u) == Just SymlinkBlob
makeannexlink key select
| islocked select = makesymlink key dest
| otherwise = makepointer key dest
where
dest = variantFile file key
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
makesymlink key dest = do
l <- calcRepo $ gitAnnexLink dest key
2015-12-29 21:02:14 +00:00
replacewithsymlink dest l
stageSymlink dest =<< hashSymlink l
replacewithsymlink dest link = withworktree dest $ \f ->
replaceFile f $ makeGitLink link
makepointer key dest = do
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
unlessM (reuseOldFile unstagedmap key file dest) $ do
r <- linkFromAnnex key dest
case r of
LinkAnnexFailed -> liftIO $
writeFile dest (formatPointer key)
_ -> noop
stagePointerFile dest =<< hashPointerFile key
Database.Keys.addAssociatedFile key =<< inRepo (toTopFilePath dest)
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
withworktree f a = ifM isDirect
( do
d <- fromRepo gitAnnexMergeDir
a (d </> f)
, a f
)
{- Stage a graft of a directory or file from a branch
- and update the work tree. -}
graftin b item selectwant selectwant' selectunwant = do
Annex.Queue.addUpdateIndex
=<< fromRepo (UpdateIndex.lsSubTree b item)
-- Update the work tree to reflect the graft.
case (selectwant (LsFiles.unmergedBlobType u), selectunwant (LsFiles.unmergedBlobType u)) of
-- Symlinks are never left in work tree when
-- there's a conflict with anything else.
-- So, when grafting in a symlink, we must create it:
(Just SymlinkBlob, _) -> do
case selectwant' (LsFiles.unmergedSha u) of
Nothing -> noop
Just sha -> do
link <- catSymLinkTarget sha
replacewithsymlink item link
-- And when grafting in anything else vs a symlink,
-- the work tree already contains what we want.
(_, Just SymlinkBlob) -> noop
_ -> ifM (withworktree item (liftIO . doesDirectoryExist))
-- a conflict between a file and a directory
-- leaves the directory, so since a directory
-- is there, it must be what was wanted
( noop
-- probably a file with conflict markers is
-- in the work tree; replace with grafted
-- file content
, case selectwant' (LsFiles.unmergedSha u) of
Nothing -> noop
Just sha -> withworktree item $ \f ->
replaceFile f $ \tmp -> do
c <- catObject sha
liftIO $ L.writeFile tmp c
)
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
resolveby ks a = do
{- Remove conflicted file from index so merge can be resolved. -}
Annex.Queue.addCommand "rm"
[Param "--quiet", Param "-f", Param "--cached", Param "--"] [file]
void a
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
return (ks, Just file)
{- git-merge moves conflicting files away to files
- named something like f~HEAD or f~branch or just f, but the
- exact name chosen can vary. Once the conflict is resolved,
- this cruft can be deleted. To avoid deleting legitimate
- files that look like this, only delete files that are
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
- A) not staged in git and
- B) have a name related to the merged files and
- C) are pointers to or have the content of keys that were involved
- in the merge.
-}
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
cleanConflictCruft :: [Key] -> [FilePath] -> InodeMap -> Annex ()
cleanConflictCruft resolvedks resolvedfs unstagedmap = do
is <- S.fromList . map (inodeCacheToKey Strongly) . concat
<$> mapM Database.Keys.getInodeCaches resolvedks
forM_ (M.toList unstagedmap) $ \(i, f) ->
whenM (matchesresolved is i f) $
liftIO $ nukeFile f
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
where
fs = S.fromList resolvedfs
ks = S.fromList resolvedks
inks = maybe False (flip S.member ks)
matchesresolved is i f
| S.member f fs || S.member (conflictCruftBase f) fs = anyM id
[ pure (S.member i is)
, inks <$> isAnnexLink f
2016-01-01 17:22:38 +00:00
, inks <$> liftIO (isPointerFile f)
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
]
| otherwise = return False
conflictCruftBase :: FilePath -> FilePath
conflictCruftBase f = reverse $ drop 1 $ dropWhile (/= '~') $ reverse f
{- When possible, reuse an existing file from the srcmap as the
- content of a worktree file in the resolved merge. It must have the
- same name as the origfile, or a name that git would use for conflict
- cruft. And, its inode cache must be a known one for the key. -}
reuseOldFile :: InodeMap -> Key -> FilePath -> FilePath -> Annex Bool
reuseOldFile srcmap key origfile destfile = do
is <- map (inodeCacheToKey Strongly)
<$> Database.Keys.getInodeCaches key
liftIO $ go $ mapMaybe (\i -> M.lookup i srcmap) is
where
go [] = return False
go (f:fs)
| f == origfile || conflictCruftBase f == origfile =
ifM (doesFileExist f)
( do
renameFile f destfile
return True
, go fs
)
| otherwise = go fs
2014-06-10 00:32:11 +00:00
commitResolvedMerge :: Git.Branch.CommitMode -> Annex Bool
commitResolvedMerge commitmode = inRepo $ Git.Branch.commitCommand commitmode
[ Param "--no-verify"
2014-06-10 00:32:11 +00:00
, Param "-m"
, Param "git-annex automatic merge conflict fix"
]
automatic conflict resolution for v6 unlocked files Several tricky parts: * When the conflict is just between the same key being locked and unlocked, the unlocked version wins, and the file is not renamed in this case. * Need to update associated file map when conflict resolution renames an unlocked file. * git merge runs the smudge filter on the conflicting file, and actually overwrites the file with the same content it had before, and so invalidates its inode cache. This makes it difficult to know when it's safe to remove such files as conflict cruft, without going so far as to compare their entire contents. Dealt with this by preventing the smudge filter from populating the file when a merge is run. However, that also prevents the smudge filter being run for non-conflicting files, so eg moving a file won't put its new content into place. * Ideally, if a merge or a merge conflict resolution renames an unlocked file, the file in the work tree can just be moved, rather than copying the content to a new worktree file. This is attempted to be done in merge conflict resolution, but due to git merge's behavior of running smudge filters, what actually seems to happen is the old worktree file with the content is deleted and rewritten as a pointer file, so doesn't get reused. So, this is probably not as efficient as it optimally could be. If that becomes a problem, could look into running the merge in a separate worktree and updating the real worktree more efficiently, similarly to the direct mode merge. However, the direct mode merge had a lot of bugs, and I'd rather not use that more error-prone method unless really needed.
2015-12-29 19:41:09 +00:00
type InodeMap = M.Map InodeCacheKey FilePath
inodeMap :: Annex ([FilePath], IO Bool) -> Annex InodeMap
inodeMap getfiles = do
(fs, cleanup) <- getfiles
fsis <- forM fs $ \f -> do
mi <- withTSDelta (liftIO . genInodeCache f)
return $ case mi of
Nothing -> Nothing
Just i -> Just (inodeCacheToKey Strongly i, f)
void $ liftIO cleanup
return $ M.fromList $ catMaybes fsis