git-annex/Command/Lock.hs

108 lines
3.1 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

2010-11-09 19:59:49 +00:00
{- git-annex command
-
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
- Copyright 2010,2015 Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name>
2010-11-09 19:59:49 +00:00
-
- Licensed under the GNU AGPL version 3 or higher.
2010-11-09 19:59:49 +00:00
-}
module Command.Lock where
import Command
2013-12-05 20:05:07 +00:00
import qualified Annex
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
import Annex.Content
import Annex.Link
import Annex.InodeSentinal
import Annex.Perms
import Annex.ReplaceFile
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
import Utility.InodeCache
import qualified Database.Keys
2015-12-22 17:23:33 +00:00
import Annex.Ingest
import Logs.Location
import Git.FilePath
import qualified Utility.RawFilePath as R
cmd :: Command
cmd = withGlobalOptions [jsonOptions, annexedMatchingOptions] $
command "lock" SectionCommon
"undo unlock command"
paramPaths (withParams seek)
2010-11-09 19:59:49 +00:00
seek :: CmdParams -> CommandSeek
seek ps = withFilesInGitAnnex ww seeker =<< workTreeItems ww ps
where
ww = WarnUnmatchLsFiles
seeker = AnnexedFileSeeker
{ startAction = start
, checkContentPresent = Nothing
, usesLocationLog = False
}
2010-11-11 22:54:52 +00:00
start :: SeekInput -> RawFilePath -> Key -> CommandStart
start si file key = ifM (isJust <$> isAnnexLink file)
( stop
, starting "lock" (mkActionItem (key, file)) si $
2016-01-01 17:22:38 +00:00
go =<< liftIO (isPointerFile file)
)
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
where
go (Just key')
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
| key' == key = cont
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
| otherwise = errorModified
go Nothing =
ifM (isUnmodified key file)
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
( cont
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
, ifM (Annex.getState Annex.force)
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
( cont
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
, errorModified
)
)
cont = perform file key
2010-11-09 19:59:49 +00:00
perform :: RawFilePath -> Key -> CommandPerform
perform file key = do
lockdown =<< calcRepo (gitAnnexLocation key)
addLink (CheckGitIgnore False) (fromRawFilePath file) key
=<< withTSDelta (liftIO . genInodeCache file)
next $ cleanup file key
where
lockdown obj = do
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
ifM (isUnmodified key obj)
( breakhardlink obj
, repopulate (fromRawFilePath obj)
)
whenM (liftIO $ R.doesPathExist obj) $
freezeContent $ fromRawFilePath obj
-- It's ok if the file is hard linked to obj, but if some other
-- associated file is, we need to break that link to lock down obj.
breakhardlink obj = whenM (catchBoolIO $ (> 1) . linkCount <$> liftIO (R.getFileStatus obj)) $ do
mfc <- withTSDelta (liftIO . genInodeCache file)
unlessM (sameInodeCache obj (maybeToList mfc)) $ do
let obj' = fromRawFilePath obj
modifyContent obj' $ replaceGitAnnexDirFile obj' $ \tmp -> do
unlessM (checkedCopyFile key obj' tmp Nothing) $
giveup "unable to lock file"
Database.Keys.storeInodeCaches key [obj]
-- Try to repopulate obj from an unmodified associated file.
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
repopulate obj = modifyContent obj $ do
g <- Annex.gitRepo
fs <- map (`fromTopFilePath` g)
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
<$> Database.Keys.getAssociatedFiles key
mfile <- firstM (isUnmodified key) fs
liftIO $ nukeFile obj
case mfile of
Just unmodified ->
unlessM (checkedCopyFile key (fromRawFilePath unmodified) obj Nothing)
lock: Fix edge cases where data loss could occur in v6 mode. In the case where the pointer file is in place, and not the content of the object, lock's performNew was called with filemodified=True, which caused it to try to repopulate the object from an unmodified associated file, of which there were none. So, the content of the object got thrown away incorrectly. This was the cause (although not the root cause) of data loss in https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/1020 The same problem could also occur when the work tree file is modified, but the object is not, and lock is called with --force. Added a test case for this, since it's excercising the same code path and is easier to set up than the problem above. Note that this only occurred when the keys database did not have an inode cache recorded for the annex object. Normally, the annex object would be in there, but there are of course circumstances where the inode cache is out of sync with reality, since it's only a cache. Fixed by checking if the object is unmodified; if so we don't need to try to repopulate it. This does add an additional checksum to the unlock path, but it's already checksumming the worktree file in another case, so it doesn't slow it down overall. Further investigation found a similar problem occurred when smudge --clean is called on a file and the inode cache is not populated. cleanOldKeys deleted the unmodified old object file in this case. This was also fixed by checking if the object is unmodified. In general, use of getInodeCaches and sameInodeCache is potentially dangerous if the inode cache has not gotten populated for some reason. Better to use isUnmodified. I breifly auited other places that check the inode cache, and did not see any immediate problems, but it would be easy to miss this kind of problem.
2016-10-17 16:56:26 +00:00
lostcontent
Nothing -> lostcontent
lostcontent = logStatus key InfoMissing
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
cleanup :: RawFilePath -> Key -> CommandCleanup
cleanup file key = do
Database.Keys.removeAssociatedFile key =<< inRepo (toTopFilePath file)
2015-12-11 14:42:18 +00:00
return True
errorModified :: a
errorModified = giveup "Locking this file would discard any changes you have made to it. Use 'git annex add' to stage your changes. (Or, use --force to override)"