git-annex/Annex/Branch.hs

364 lines
12 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

2011-06-21 20:08:09 +00:00
{- management of the git-annex branch
-
- Copyright 2011-2012 Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
-
- Licensed under the GNU GPL version 3 or higher.
-}
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
2011-10-04 04:40:47 +00:00
module Annex.Branch (
fullname,
name,
hasOrigin,
hasSibling,
siblingBranches,
create,
2011-06-21 20:08:09 +00:00
update,
forceUpdate,
updateTo,
get,
change,
2011-06-22 21:47:06 +00:00
commit,
files,
withIndex,
2011-06-21 20:08:09 +00:00
) where
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy.Char8 as L
2011-10-05 20:02:51 +00:00
import Common.Annex
2011-12-12 21:38:46 +00:00
import Annex.BranchState
2011-12-12 22:03:28 +00:00
import Annex.Journal
import qualified Git
2011-12-14 19:56:11 +00:00
import qualified Git.Command
2011-12-12 22:23:24 +00:00
import qualified Git.Ref
import qualified Git.Branch
2011-12-13 01:24:55 +00:00
import qualified Git.UnionMerge
import qualified Git.UpdateIndex
import Git.HashObject
import Git.Types
import Git.FilePath
2011-10-04 04:40:47 +00:00
import Annex.CatFile
import Annex.Perms
2012-08-25 00:50:39 +00:00
import qualified Annex
2013-05-11 22:23:41 +00:00
import Utility.Env
{- Name of the branch that is used to store git-annex's information. -}
name :: Git.Ref
name = Git.Ref "git-annex"
{- Fully qualified name of the branch. -}
fullname :: Git.Ref
fullname = Git.Ref $ "refs/heads/" ++ show name
{- Branch's name in origin. -}
originname :: Git.Ref
originname = Git.Ref $ "origin/" ++ show name
{- Does origin/git-annex exist? -}
hasOrigin :: Annex Bool
hasOrigin = inRepo $ Git.Ref.exists originname
{- Does the git-annex branch or a sibling foo/git-annex branch exist? -}
hasSibling :: Annex Bool
hasSibling = not . null <$> siblingBranches
{- List of git-annex (refs, branches), including the main one and any
- from remotes. Duplicate refs are filtered out. -}
siblingBranches :: Annex [(Git.Ref, Git.Branch)]
siblingBranches = inRepo $ Git.Ref.matchingUniq [name]
{- Creates the branch, if it does not already exist. -}
create :: Annex ()
2012-06-12 15:32:06 +00:00
create = void getBranch
{- Returns the ref of the branch, creating it first if necessary. -}
2012-01-10 19:36:54 +00:00
getBranch :: Annex Git.Ref
getBranch = maybe (hasOrigin >>= go >>= use) return =<< branchsha
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
where
go True = do
inRepo $ Git.Command.run
[Param "branch", Param $ show name, Param $ show originname]
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
fromMaybe (error $ "failed to create " ++ show name)
<$> branchsha
go False = withIndex' True $
inRepo $ Git.Branch.commit "branch created" fullname []
use sha = do
setIndexSha sha
return sha
branchsha = inRepo $ Git.Ref.sha fullname
2012-09-15 19:40:13 +00:00
{- Ensures that the branch and index are up-to-date; should be
- called before data is read from it. Runs only once per git-annex run. -}
update :: Annex ()
update = runUpdateOnce $ void $ updateTo =<< siblingBranches
{- Forces an update even if one has already been run. -}
forceUpdate :: Annex Bool
forceUpdate = updateTo =<< siblingBranches
{- Merges the specified Refs into the index, if they have any changes not
- already in it. The Branch names are only used in the commit message;
- it's even possible that the provided Branches have not been updated to
- point to the Refs yet.
-
- The branch is fast-forwarded if possible, otherwise a merge commit is
- made.
-
- Before Refs are merged into the index, it's important to first stage the
merge: Use fast-forward merges when possible. Thanks Valentin Haenel for a test case showing how non-fast-forward merges could result in an ongoing pull/merge/push cycle. While the git-annex branch is fast-forwarded, git-annex's index file is still updated using the union merge strategy as before. There's no other way to update the index that would be any faster. It is possible that a union merge and a fast-forward result in different file contents: Files should have the same lines, but a union merge may change their order. If this happens, the next commit made to the git-annex branch will have some unnecessary changes to line orders, but the consistency of data should be preserved. Note that when the journal contains changes, a fast-forward is never attempted, which is fine, because committing those changes would be vanishingly unlikely to leave the git-annex branch at a commit that already exists in one of the remotes. The real difficulty is handling the case where multiple remotes have all changed. git-annex does find the best (ie, newest) one and fast forwards to it. If the remotes are diverged, no fast-forward is done at all. It would be possible to pick one, fast forward to it, and make a merge commit to the rest, I see no benefit to adding that complexity. Determining the best of N changed remotes requires N*2+1 calls to git-log, but these are fast git-log calls, and N is typically small. Also, typically some or all of the remote refs will be the same, and git-log is not called to compare those. In the real world I expect this will almost always add only 1 git-log call to the merge process. (Which already makes N anyway.)
2011-11-06 19:18:45 +00:00
- journal into the index. Otherwise, any changes in the journal would
- later get staged, and might overwrite changes made during the merge.
- This is only done if some of the Refs do need to be merged.
-
- Returns True if any refs were merged in, False otherwise.
-}
updateTo :: [(Git.Ref, Git.Branch)] -> Annex Bool
updateTo pairs = do
-- ensure branch exists, and get its current ref
branchref <- getBranch
dirty <- journalDirty
(refs, branches) <- unzip <$> filterM isnewer pairs
if null refs
2012-12-13 04:45:27 +00:00
{- Even when no refs need to be merged, the index
- may still be updated if the branch has gotten ahead
- of the index. -}
then whenM (needUpdateIndex branchref) $ lockJournal $ do
forceUpdateIndex branchref
{- When there are journalled changes
- as well as the branch being updated,
- a commit needs to be done. -}
when dirty $
go branchref True [] []
else lockJournal $ go branchref dirty refs branches
return $ not $ null refs
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
where
isnewer (r, _) = inRepo $ Git.Branch.changed fullname r
go branchref dirty refs branches = withIndex $ do
cleanjournal <- if dirty then stageJournal else return noop
let merge_desc = if null branches
then "update"
else "merging " ++
unwords (map Git.Ref.describe branches) ++
" into " ++ show name
unless (null branches) $ do
showSideAction merge_desc
mergeIndex refs
ff <- if dirty
then return False
else inRepo $ Git.Branch.fastForward fullname refs
if ff
then updateIndex branchref
else commitBranch branchref merge_desc
(nub $ fullname:refs)
liftIO cleanjournal
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
{- Gets the content of a file, which may be in the journal, or in the index
- (and committed to the branch).
-
- Updates the branch if necessary, to ensure the most up-to-date available
- content is available.
-
- Returns an empty string if the file doesn't exist yet. -}
get :: FilePath -> Annex String
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
get file = do
update
get' file
{- Like get, but does not merge the branch, so the info returned may not
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
- reflect changes in remotes.
- (Changing the value this returns, and then merging is always the
- same as using get, and then changing its value.) -}
getStale :: FilePath -> Annex String
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
getStale = get'
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
get' :: FilePath -> Annex String
get' file = go =<< getJournalFile file
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
where
Fix a bug in the git-annex branch handling code that could cause info from a remote to not be merged and take effect immediately. This bug was turned up by the test suite, running fsck in direct mode. A repository was cloned, was put into direct mode, was fscked, and fsck incorrectly said that no copy existed of a file, that was actually present in origin. This turned out to occur because fsck first did a Annex.Branch.change, recording that it did not locally have the file. That was recorded in the journal. Since neither the git annex direct not the fsck had yet needed to read any info from the branch, but had only made changes to it, the origin/git-annex branch was not yet merged in. So the journal got a location log entry written to it, but this did not include the location log info for the origin. When fsck then did a Annex.Branch.get, it trusted the journal was cosnsitent, and returned it, again w/o merging from origin/git-annex. This latter behavior is the actual bug. Refer to commit e9bfa8eaed3ff59a4c0bc8d4d677bc493177807c for the thinking behind it being ok to make a change to a file on the branch, without first merging the branch. That thinking still stands. However, it means that files in the journal cannot be trusted to be consistent if the branch has not been merged. So, to fix, just enure the branch gets merged, even when reading from the journal. In tests, this does not seem to cause any extra merging. Except, of course, in the one case described above. But git annex add, etc, are able to make changes w/o first merging the branch.
2013-05-20 19:14:59 +00:00
go (Just journalcontent) = return journalcontent
go Nothing = withIndex $ L.unpack <$> catFile fullname file
{- Applies a function to modifiy the content of a file.
-
- Note that this does not cause the branch to be merged, it only
- modifes the current content of the file on the branch.
-}
change :: FilePath -> (String -> String) -> Annex ()
2012-02-16 04:41:30 +00:00
change file a = lockJournal $ a <$> getStale file >>= set file
{- Records new content of a file into the journal -}
set :: FilePath -> String -> Annex ()
2013-04-03 07:52:41 +00:00
set = setJournalFile
{- Stages the journal, and commits staged changes to the branch. -}
commit :: String -> Annex ()
commit message = whenM journalDirty $ lockJournal $ do
cleanjournal <- stageJournal
ref <- getBranch
withIndex $ commitBranch ref message [fullname]
2013-04-03 07:52:41 +00:00
liftIO cleanjournal
{- Commits the staged changes in the index to the branch.
-
- Ensures that the branch's index file is first updated to the state
- of the branch at branchref, before running the commit action. This
- is needed because the branch may have had changes pushed to it, that
- are not yet reflected in the index.
-
- Also safely handles a race that can occur if a change is being pushed
- into the branch at the same time. When the race happens, the commit will
- be made on top of the newly pushed change, but without the index file
- being updated to include it. The result is that the newly pushed
- change is reverted. This race is detected and another commit made
- to fix it.
-
- The branchref value can have been obtained using getBranch at any
- previous point, though getting it a long time ago makes the race
- more likely to occur.
-}
commitBranch :: Git.Ref -> String -> [Git.Ref] -> Annex ()
commitBranch branchref message parents = do
showStoringStateAction
commitBranch' branchref message parents
commitBranch' :: Git.Ref -> String -> [Git.Ref] -> Annex ()
commitBranch' branchref message parents = do
updateIndex branchref
2011-12-13 19:08:44 +00:00
committedref <- inRepo $ Git.Branch.commit message fullname parents
setIndexSha committedref
parentrefs <- commitparents <$> catObject committedref
when (racedetected branchref parentrefs) $
fixrace committedref parentrefs
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
where
-- look for "parent ref" lines and return the refs
commitparents = map (Git.Ref . snd) . filter isparent .
map (toassoc . L.unpack) . L.lines
toassoc = separate (== ' ')
isparent (k,_) = k == "parent"
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
{- The race can be detected by checking the commit's
- parent, which will be the newly pushed branch,
- instead of the expected ref that the index was updated to. -}
racedetected expectedref parentrefs
| expectedref `elem` parentrefs = False -- good parent
| otherwise = True -- race!
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
{- To recover from the race, union merge the lost refs
- into the index, and recommit on top of the bad commit. -}
fixrace committedref lostrefs = do
mergeIndex lostrefs
commitBranch committedref racemessage [committedref]
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
racemessage = message ++ " (recovery from race)"
{- Lists all files on the branch. There may be duplicates in the list. -}
files :: Annex [FilePath]
2012-09-15 19:40:13 +00:00
files = do
update
withIndex $ do
bfiles <- inRepo $ Git.Command.pipeNullSplitZombie
[ Params "ls-tree --name-only -r -z"
, Param $ show fullname
]
2012-09-15 19:40:13 +00:00
jfiles <- getJournalledFiles
return $ jfiles ++ bfiles
{- Populates the branch's index file with the current branch contents.
-
- This is only done when the index doesn't yet exist, and the index
- is used to build up changes to be commited to the branch, and merge
- in changes from other branches.
-}
genIndex :: Git.Repo -> IO ()
genIndex g = Git.UpdateIndex.streamUpdateIndex g
[Git.UpdateIndex.lsTree fullname g]
{- Merges the specified refs into the index.
- Any changes staged in the index will be preserved. -}
mergeIndex :: [Git.Ref] -> Annex ()
mergeIndex branches = do
h <- catFileHandle
inRepo $ \g -> Git.UnionMerge.mergeIndex h g branches
{- Runs an action using the branch's index file. -}
withIndex :: Annex a -> Annex a
withIndex = withIndex' False
withIndex' :: Bool -> Annex a -> Annex a
withIndex' bootstrapping a = do
f <- fromRepo gitAnnexIndex
2012-08-25 00:50:39 +00:00
g <- gitRepo
#ifdef __ANDROID__
{- This should not be necessary on Android, but there is some
- weird getEnvironment breakage. See
- https://github.com/neurocyte/ghc-android/issues/7
- Use getEnv to get some key environment variables that
- git expects to have. -}
let keyenv = words "USER PATH GIT_EXEC_PATH HOSTNAME HOME"
let getEnvPair k = maybe Nothing (\v -> Just (k, v)) <$> getEnv k
e <- liftIO $ catMaybes <$> forM keyenv getEnvPair
#else
e <- liftIO getEnvironment
#endif
let g' = g { gitEnv = Just $ ("GIT_INDEX_FILE", f):e }
2012-08-25 00:50:39 +00:00
Annex.changeState $ \s -> s { Annex.repo = g' }
checkIndexOnce $ unlessM (liftIO $ doesFileExist f) $ do
unless bootstrapping create
liftIO $ createDirectoryIfMissing True $ takeDirectory f
unless bootstrapping $ inRepo genIndex
r <- a
Annex.changeState $ \s -> s { Annex.repo = (Annex.repo s) { gitEnv = gitEnv g} }
return r
{- Updates the branch's index to reflect the current contents of the branch.
- Any changes staged in the index will be preserved.
-
- Compares the ref stored in the lock file with the current
- ref of the branch to see if an update is needed.
-}
updateIndex :: Git.Ref -> Annex ()
updateIndex branchref = whenM (needUpdateIndex branchref) $
forceUpdateIndex branchref
forceUpdateIndex :: Git.Ref -> Annex ()
forceUpdateIndex branchref = do
withIndex $ mergeIndex [fullname]
setIndexSha branchref
{- Checks if the index needs to be updated. -}
needUpdateIndex :: Git.Ref -> Annex Bool
needUpdateIndex branchref = do
lock <- fromRepo gitAnnexIndexLock
lockref <- Git.Ref . firstLine <$>
2012-09-17 04:18:07 +00:00
liftIO (catchDefaultIO "" $ readFileStrict lock)
return (lockref /= branchref)
{- Record that the branch's index has been updated to correspond to a
- given ref of the branch. -}
setIndexSha :: Git.Ref -> Annex ()
setIndexSha ref = do
2012-12-13 04:45:27 +00:00
lock <- fromRepo gitAnnexIndexLock
liftIO $ writeFile lock $ show ref ++ "\n"
setAnnexPerm lock
{- Stages the journal into the index and returns an action that will
- clean up the staged journal files, which should only be run once
- the index has been committed to the branch. Should be run within
- lockJournal, to prevent others from modifying the journal. -}
stageJournal :: Annex (IO ())
stageJournal = withIndex $ do
g <- gitRepo
let dir = gitAnnexJournalDir g
fs <- getJournalFiles
liftIO $ do
h <- hashObjectStart g
Git.UpdateIndex.streamUpdateIndex g
[genstream dir h fs]
hashObjectStop h
2013-04-03 07:52:41 +00:00
return $ liftIO $ mapM_ (removeFile . (dir </>)) fs
2012-12-13 04:24:19 +00:00
where
genstream dir h fs streamer = forM_ fs $ \file -> do
let path = dir </> file
sha <- hashFile h path
streamer $ Git.UpdateIndex.updateIndexLine
sha FileBlob (asTopFilePath $ fileJournal file)