Update security.md
I don't think this is accurate. This is not a feature of HTTPS. This would require certificate pinning. It has been in the security docs since 2db125890c
Related
https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/3330
https://www.npmjs.com/package/electron-ssl-pinning
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Pinning_Cheat_Sheet.html
		
	
			
		
			
				
	
	
		
			769 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			28 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			769 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			28 KiB
			
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
---
 | 
						||
title: Security
 | 
						||
description: A set of guidelines for building secure Electron apps
 | 
						||
slug: security
 | 
						||
hide_title: true
 | 
						||
toc_max_heading_level: 3
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
# Security
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info Reporting security issues
 | 
						||
For information on how to properly disclose an Electron vulnerability,
 | 
						||
see [SECURITY.md](https://github.com/electron/electron/tree/main/SECURITY.md).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For upstream Chromium vulnerabilities: Electron keeps up to date with alternating
 | 
						||
Chromium releases. For more information, see the
 | 
						||
[Electron Release Timelines](../tutorial/electron-timelines.md) document.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Preface
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
As web developers, we usually enjoy the strong security net of the browser —
 | 
						||
the risks associated with the code we write are relatively small. Our websites
 | 
						||
are granted limited powers in a sandbox, and we trust that our users enjoy a
 | 
						||
browser built by a large team of engineers that is able to quickly respond to
 | 
						||
newly discovered security threats.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When working with Electron, it is important to understand that Electron is not
 | 
						||
a web browser. It allows you to build feature-rich desktop applications with
 | 
						||
familiar web technologies, but your code wields much greater power. JavaScript
 | 
						||
can access the filesystem, user shell, and more. This allows you to build
 | 
						||
high quality native applications, but the inherent security risks scale with
 | 
						||
the additional powers granted to your code.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
With that in mind, be aware that displaying arbitrary content from untrusted
 | 
						||
sources poses a severe security risk that Electron is not intended to handle.
 | 
						||
In fact, the most popular Electron apps (Atom, Slack, Visual Studio Code, etc)
 | 
						||
display primarily local content (or trusted, secure remote content without Node
 | 
						||
integration) — if your application executes code from an online source, it is
 | 
						||
your responsibility to ensure that the code is not malicious.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## General guidelines
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Security is everyone's responsibility
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is important to remember that the security of your Electron application is
 | 
						||
the result of the overall security of the framework foundation
 | 
						||
(*Chromium*, *Node.js*), Electron itself, all NPM dependencies and
 | 
						||
your code. As such, it is your responsibility to follow a few important best
 | 
						||
practices:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* **Keep your application up-to-date with the latest Electron framework release.**
 | 
						||
When releasing your product, you’re also shipping a bundle composed of Electron,
 | 
						||
Chromium shared library and Node.js. Vulnerabilities affecting these components
 | 
						||
may impact the security of your application. By updating Electron to the latest
 | 
						||
version, you ensure that critical vulnerabilities (such as *nodeIntegration bypasses*)
 | 
						||
are already patched and cannot be exploited in your application. For more information,
 | 
						||
see "[Use a current version of Electron](#16-use-a-current-version-of-electron)".
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* **Evaluate your dependencies.** While NPM provides half a million reusable packages,
 | 
						||
it is your responsibility to choose trusted 3rd-party libraries. If you use outdated
 | 
						||
libraries affected by known vulnerabilities or rely on poorly maintained code,
 | 
						||
your application security could be in jeopardy.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
* **Adopt secure coding practices.** The first line of defense for your application
 | 
						||
is your own code. Common web vulnerabilities, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS),
 | 
						||
have a higher security impact on Electron applications hence it is highly recommended
 | 
						||
to adopt secure software development best practices and perform security testing.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Isolation for untrusted content
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A security issue exists whenever you receive code from an untrusted source (e.g.
 | 
						||
a remote server) and execute it locally. As an example, consider a remote
 | 
						||
website being displayed inside a default [`BrowserWindow`][browser-window]. If
 | 
						||
an attacker somehow manages to change said content (either by attacking the
 | 
						||
source directly, or by sitting between your app and the actual destination), they
 | 
						||
will be able to execute native code on the user's machine.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::warning
 | 
						||
Under no circumstances should you load and execute remote code with
 | 
						||
Node.js integration enabled. Instead, use only local files (packaged together
 | 
						||
with your application) to execute Node.js code. To display remote content, use
 | 
						||
the [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tag or [`BrowserView`][browser-view], make sure
 | 
						||
to disable the `nodeIntegration` and enable `contextIsolation`.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info Electron security warnings
 | 
						||
Security warnings and recommendations are printed to the developer console.
 | 
						||
They only show up when the binary's name is Electron, indicating that a developer
 | 
						||
is currently looking at the console.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You can force-enable or force-disable these warnings by setting
 | 
						||
`ELECTRON_ENABLE_SECURITY_WARNINGS` or `ELECTRON_DISABLE_SECURITY_WARNINGS` on
 | 
						||
either `process.env` or the `window` object.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Checklist: Security recommendations
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You should at least follow these steps to improve the security of your application:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. [Only load secure content](#1-only-load-secure-content)
 | 
						||
2. [Disable the Node.js integration in all renderers that display remote content](#2-do-not-enable-nodejs-integration-for-remote-content)
 | 
						||
3. [Enable context isolation in all renderers](#3-enable-context-isolation)
 | 
						||
4. [Enable process sandboxing](#4-enable-process-sandboxing)
 | 
						||
5. [Use `ses.setPermissionRequestHandler()` in all sessions that load remote content](#5-handle-session-permission-requests-from-remote-content)
 | 
						||
6. [Do not disable `webSecurity`](#6-do-not-disable-websecurity)
 | 
						||
7. [Define a `Content-Security-Policy`](#7-define-a-content-security-policy) and use restrictive rules (i.e. `script-src 'self'`)
 | 
						||
8. [Do not enable `allowRunningInsecureContent`](#8-do-not-enable-allowrunninginsecurecontent)
 | 
						||
9. [Do not enable experimental features](#9-do-not-enable-experimental-features)
 | 
						||
10. [Do not use `enableBlinkFeatures`](#10-do-not-use-enableblinkfeatures)
 | 
						||
11. [`<webview>`: Do not use `allowpopups`](#11-do-not-use-allowpopups-for-webviews)
 | 
						||
12. [`<webview>`: Verify options and params](#12-verify-webview-options-before-creation)
 | 
						||
13. [Disable or limit navigation](#13-disable-or-limit-navigation)
 | 
						||
14. [Disable or limit creation of new windows](#14-disable-or-limit-creation-of-new-windows)
 | 
						||
15. [Do not use `shell.openExternal` with untrusted content](#15-do-not-use-shellopenexternal-with-untrusted-content)
 | 
						||
16. [Use a current version of Electron](#16-use-a-current-version-of-electron)
 | 
						||
17. [Validate the `sender` of all IPC messages](#17-validate-the-sender-of-all-ipc-messages)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
To automate the detection of misconfigurations and insecure patterns, it is
 | 
						||
possible to use
 | 
						||
[Electronegativity](https://github.com/doyensec/electronegativity). For
 | 
						||
additional details on potential weaknesses and implementation bugs when
 | 
						||
developing applications using Electron, please refer to this [guide for
 | 
						||
developers and auditors](https://doyensec.com/resources/us-17-Carettoni-Electronegativity-A-Study-Of-Electron-Security-wp.pdf).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 1. Only load secure content
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Any resources not included with your application should be loaded using a
 | 
						||
secure protocol like `HTTPS`. In other words, do not use insecure protocols
 | 
						||
like `HTTP`. Similarly, we recommend the use of `WSS` over `WS`, `FTPS` over
 | 
						||
`FTP`, and so on.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
`HTTPS` has two main benefits:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. It ensures data integrity, asserting that the data was not modified while in
 | 
						||
   transit between your application and the host.
 | 
						||
1. It encrypts the traffic between your user and the destination host, making it
 | 
						||
   more difficult to eavesdrop on the information sent between your app and
 | 
						||
   the host.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
browserWindow.loadURL('http://example.com')
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
browserWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```html title='index.html (Renderer Process)'
 | 
						||
<!-- Bad -->
 | 
						||
<script crossorigin src="http://example.com/react.js"></script>
 | 
						||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://example.com/style.css">
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
<!-- Good -->
 | 
						||
<script crossorigin src="https://example.com/react.js"></script>
 | 
						||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://example.com/style.css">
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 2. Do not enable Node.js integration for remote content
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is the default behavior in Electron since 5.0.0.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is paramount that you do not enable Node.js integration in any renderer
 | 
						||
([`BrowserWindow`][browser-window], [`BrowserView`][browser-view], or
 | 
						||
[`<webview>`][webview-tag]) that loads remote content. The goal is to limit the
 | 
						||
powers you grant to remote content, thus making it dramatically more difficult
 | 
						||
for an attacker to harm your users should they gain the ability to execute
 | 
						||
JavaScript on your website.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
After this, you can grant additional permissions for specific hosts. For example,
 | 
						||
if you are opening a BrowserWindow pointed at `https://example.com/`, you can
 | 
						||
give that website exactly the abilities it needs, but no more.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A cross-site-scripting (XSS) attack is more dangerous if an attacker can jump
 | 
						||
out of the renderer process and execute code on the user's computer.
 | 
						||
Cross-site-scripting attacks are fairly common - and while an issue, their
 | 
						||
power is usually limited to messing with the website that they are executed on.
 | 
						||
Disabling Node.js integration helps prevent an XSS from being escalated into a
 | 
						||
so-called "Remote Code Execution" (RCE) attack.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    contextIsolation: false,
 | 
						||
    nodeIntegration: true,
 | 
						||
    nodeIntegrationInWorker: true
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
mainWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    preload: path.join(app.getAppPath(), 'preload.js')
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
mainWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```html title='index.html (Renderer Process)'
 | 
						||
<!-- Bad -->
 | 
						||
<webview nodeIntegration src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
<!-- Good -->
 | 
						||
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
When disabling Node.js integration, you can still expose APIs to your website that
 | 
						||
do consume Node.js modules or features. Preload scripts continue to have access
 | 
						||
to `require` and other Node.js features, allowing developers to expose a custom
 | 
						||
API to remotely loaded content via the [contextBridge API](../api/context-bridge.md).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 3. Enable Context Isolation
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is the default behavior in Electron since 12.0.0.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Context isolation is an Electron feature that allows developers to run code
 | 
						||
in preload scripts and in Electron APIs in a dedicated JavaScript context. In
 | 
						||
practice, that means that global objects like `Array.prototype.push` or
 | 
						||
`JSON.parse` cannot be modified by scripts running in the renderer process.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Electron uses the same technology as Chromium's [Content Scripts](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/content_scripts#execution-environment)
 | 
						||
to enable this behavior.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Even when `nodeIntegration: false` is used, to truly enforce strong isolation
 | 
						||
and prevent the use of Node primitives `contextIsolation` **must** also be used.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
For more information on what `contextIsolation` is and how to enable it please
 | 
						||
see our dedicated [Context Isolation](context-isolation.md) document.
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 4. Enable process sandboxing
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[Sandboxing](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/docs/design/sandbox.md)
 | 
						||
is a Chromium feature that uses the operating system to
 | 
						||
significantly limit what renderer processes have access to. You should enable
 | 
						||
the sandbox in all renderers. Loading, reading or processing any untrusted
 | 
						||
content in an unsandboxed process, including the main process, is not advised.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
For more information on what Process Sandboxing is and how to enable it please
 | 
						||
see our dedicated [Process Sandboxing](sandbox.md) document.
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 5. Handle session permission requests from remote content
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You may have seen permission requests while using Chrome: they pop up whenever
 | 
						||
the website attempts to use a feature that the user has to manually approve (
 | 
						||
like notifications).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The API is based on the [Chromium permissions API](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/permissions)
 | 
						||
and implements the same types of permissions.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By default, Electron will automatically approve all permission requests unless
 | 
						||
the developer has manually configured a custom handler. While a solid default,
 | 
						||
security-conscious developers might want to assume the very opposite.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
const { session } = require('electron')
 | 
						||
const URL = require('url').URL
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
session
 | 
						||
  .fromPartition('some-partition')
 | 
						||
  .setPermissionRequestHandler((webContents, permission, callback) => {
 | 
						||
    const parsedUrl = new URL(webContents.getURL())
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    if (permission === 'notifications') {
 | 
						||
      // Approves the permissions request
 | 
						||
      callback(true)
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    // Verify URL
 | 
						||
    if (parsedUrl.protocol !== 'https:' || parsedUrl.host !== 'example.com') {
 | 
						||
      // Denies the permissions request
 | 
						||
      return callback(false)
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
  })
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 6. Do not disable `webSecurity`
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is Electron's default.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You may have already guessed that disabling the `webSecurity` property on a
 | 
						||
renderer process ([`BrowserWindow`][browser-window],
 | 
						||
[`BrowserView`][browser-view], or [`<webview>`][webview-tag]) disables crucial
 | 
						||
security features.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Do not disable `webSecurity` in production applications.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Disabling `webSecurity` will disable the same-origin policy and set
 | 
						||
`allowRunningInsecureContent` property to `true`. In other words, it allows
 | 
						||
the execution of insecure code from different domains.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    webSecurity: false
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow()
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```html title='index.html (Renderer Process)'
 | 
						||
<!-- Bad -->
 | 
						||
<webview disablewebsecurity src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
<!-- Good -->
 | 
						||
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 7. Define a Content Security Policy
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A Content Security Policy (CSP) is an additional layer of protection against
 | 
						||
cross-site-scripting attacks and data injection attacks. We recommend that they
 | 
						||
be enabled by any website you load inside Electron.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
CSP allows the server serving content to restrict and control the resources
 | 
						||
Electron can load for that given web page. `https://example.com` should
 | 
						||
be allowed to load scripts from the origins you defined while scripts from
 | 
						||
`https://evil.attacker.com` should not be allowed to run. Defining a CSP is an
 | 
						||
easy way to improve your application's security.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The following CSP will allow Electron to execute scripts from the current
 | 
						||
website and from `apis.example.com`.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```plaintext
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
Content-Security-Policy: '*'
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' https://apis.example.com
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### CSP HTTP headers
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Electron respects the [`Content-Security-Policy` HTTP header](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy)
 | 
						||
which can be set using Electron's
 | 
						||
[`webRequest.onHeadersReceived`](../api/web-request.md#webrequestonheadersreceivedfilter-listener)
 | 
						||
handler:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```javascript title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
const { session } = require('electron')
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
session.defaultSession.webRequest.onHeadersReceived((details, callback) => {
 | 
						||
  callback({
 | 
						||
    responseHeaders: {
 | 
						||
      ...details.responseHeaders,
 | 
						||
      'Content-Security-Policy': ['default-src \'none\'']
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
  })
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### CSP meta tag
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
CSP's preferred delivery mechanism is an HTTP header. However, it is not possible
 | 
						||
to use this method when loading a resource using the `file://` protocol. It can
 | 
						||
be useful in some cases to set a policy on a page directly in the markup using a
 | 
						||
`<meta>` tag:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```html title='index.html (Renderer Process)'
 | 
						||
<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="default-src 'none'">
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 8. Do not enable `allowRunningInsecureContent`
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is Electron's default.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
By default, Electron will not allow websites loaded over `HTTPS` to load and
 | 
						||
execute scripts, CSS, or plugins from insecure sources (`HTTP`). Setting the
 | 
						||
property `allowRunningInsecureContent` to `true` disables that protection.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Loading the initial HTML of a website over `HTTPS` and attempting to load
 | 
						||
subsequent resources via `HTTP` is also known as "mixed content".
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Loading content over `HTTPS` assures the authenticity and integrity
 | 
						||
of the loaded resources while encrypting the traffic itself. See the section on
 | 
						||
[only displaying secure content](#1-only-load-secure-content) for more details.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    allowRunningInsecureContent: true
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 9. Do not enable experimental features
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is Electron's default.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Advanced users of Electron can enable experimental Chromium features using the
 | 
						||
`experimentalFeatures` property.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Experimental features are, as the name suggests, experimental and have not been
 | 
						||
enabled for all Chromium users. Furthermore, their impact on Electron as a whole
 | 
						||
has likely not been tested.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Legitimate use cases exist, but unless you know what you are doing, you should
 | 
						||
not enable this property.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    experimentalFeatures: true
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 10. Do not use `enableBlinkFeatures`
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is Electron's default.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Blink is the name of the rendering engine behind Chromium. As with
 | 
						||
`experimentalFeatures`, the `enableBlinkFeatures` property allows developers to
 | 
						||
enable features that have been disabled by default.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Generally speaking, there are likely good reasons if a feature was not enabled
 | 
						||
by default. Legitimate use cases for enabling specific features exist. As a
 | 
						||
developer, you should know exactly why you need to enable a feature, what the
 | 
						||
ramifications are, and how it impacts the security of your application. Under
 | 
						||
no circumstances should you enable features speculatively.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
 | 
						||
  webPreferences: {
 | 
						||
    enableBlinkFeatures: 'ExecCommandInJavaScript'
 | 
						||
  }
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow()
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 11. Do not use `allowpopups` for WebViews
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
:::info
 | 
						||
This recommendation is Electron's default.
 | 
						||
:::
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you are using [`<webview>`][webview-tag], you might need the pages and scripts
 | 
						||
loaded in your `<webview>` tag to open new windows. The `allowpopups` attribute
 | 
						||
enables them to create new [`BrowserWindows`][browser-window] using the
 | 
						||
`window.open()` method. `<webview>` tags are otherwise not allowed to create new
 | 
						||
windows.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you do not need popups, you are better off not allowing the creation of
 | 
						||
new [`BrowserWindows`][browser-window] by default. This follows the principle
 | 
						||
of minimally required access: Don't let a website create new popups unless
 | 
						||
you know it needs that feature.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```html title='index.html (Renderer Process)'
 | 
						||
<!-- Bad -->
 | 
						||
<webview allowpopups src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
<!-- Good -->
 | 
						||
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 12. Verify WebView options before creation
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A WebView created in a renderer process that does not have Node.js integration
 | 
						||
enabled will not be able to enable integration itself. However, a WebView will
 | 
						||
always create an independent renderer process with its own `webPreferences`.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is a good idea to control the creation of new [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tags
 | 
						||
from the main process and to verify that their webPreferences do not disable
 | 
						||
security features.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Since `<webview>` live in the DOM, they can be created by a script running on your
 | 
						||
website even if Node.js integration is otherwise disabled.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Electron enables developers to disable various security features that control
 | 
						||
a renderer process. In most cases, developers do not need to disable any of
 | 
						||
those features - and you should therefore not allow different configurations
 | 
						||
for newly created [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tags.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Before a [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tag is attached, Electron will fire the
 | 
						||
`will-attach-webview` event on the hosting `webContents`. Use the event to
 | 
						||
prevent the creation of `webViews` with possibly insecure options.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
 | 
						||
  contents.on('will-attach-webview', (event, webPreferences, params) => {
 | 
						||
    // Strip away preload scripts if unused or verify their location is legitimate
 | 
						||
    delete webPreferences.preload
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    // Disable Node.js integration
 | 
						||
    webPreferences.nodeIntegration = false
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    // Verify URL being loaded
 | 
						||
    if (!params.src.startsWith('https://example.com/')) {
 | 
						||
      event.preventDefault()
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
  })
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Again, this list merely minimizes the risk, but does not remove it. If your goal
 | 
						||
is to display a website, a browser will be a more secure option.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 13. Disable or limit navigation
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If your app has no need to navigate or only needs to navigate to known pages,
 | 
						||
it is a good idea to limit navigation outright to that known scope, disallowing
 | 
						||
any other kinds of navigation.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Navigation is a common attack vector. If an attacker can convince your app to
 | 
						||
navigate away from its current page, they can possibly force your app to open
 | 
						||
web sites on the Internet. Even if your `webContents` are configured to be more
 | 
						||
secure (like having `nodeIntegration` disabled or `contextIsolation` enabled),
 | 
						||
getting your app to open a random web site will make the work of exploiting your
 | 
						||
app a lot easier.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
A common attack pattern is that the attacker convinces your app's users to
 | 
						||
interact with the app in such a way that it navigates to one of the attacker's
 | 
						||
pages. This is usually done via links, plugins, or other user-generated content.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If your app has no need for navigation, you can call `event.preventDefault()`
 | 
						||
in a [`will-navigate`][will-navigate] handler. If you know which pages your app
 | 
						||
might navigate to, check the URL in the event handler and only let navigation
 | 
						||
occur if it matches the URLs you're expecting.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
We recommend that you use Node's parser for URLs. Simple string comparisons can
 | 
						||
sometimes be fooled - a `startsWith('https://example.com')` test would let
 | 
						||
`https://example.com.attacker.com` through.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
const URL = require('url').URL
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
 | 
						||
  contents.on('will-navigate', (event, navigationUrl) => {
 | 
						||
    const parsedUrl = new URL(navigationUrl)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    if (parsedUrl.origin !== 'https://example.com') {
 | 
						||
      event.preventDefault()
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
  })
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 14. Disable or limit creation of new windows
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you have a known set of windows, it's a good idea to limit the creation of
 | 
						||
additional windows in your app.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Much like navigation, the creation of new `webContents` is a common attack
 | 
						||
vector. Attackers attempt to convince your app to create new windows, frames,
 | 
						||
or other renderer processes with more privileges than they had before; or
 | 
						||
with pages opened that they couldn't open before.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you have no need to create windows in addition to the ones you know you'll
 | 
						||
need to create, disabling the creation buys you a little bit of extra
 | 
						||
security at no cost. This is commonly the case for apps that open one
 | 
						||
`BrowserWindow` and do not need to open an arbitrary number of additional
 | 
						||
windows at runtime.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[`webContents`][web-contents] will delegate to its [window open
 | 
						||
handler][window-open-handler] before creating new windows. The handler will
 | 
						||
receive, amongst other parameters, the `url` the window was requested to open
 | 
						||
and the options used to create it. We recommend that you register a handler to
 | 
						||
monitor the creation of windows, and deny any unexpected window creation.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
const { shell } = require('electron')
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
 | 
						||
  contents.setWindowOpenHandler(({ url }) => {
 | 
						||
    // In this example, we'll ask the operating system
 | 
						||
    // to open this event's url in the default browser.
 | 
						||
    //
 | 
						||
    // See the following item for considerations regarding what
 | 
						||
    // URLs should be allowed through to shell.openExternal.
 | 
						||
    if (isSafeForExternalOpen(url)) {
 | 
						||
      setImmediate(() => {
 | 
						||
        shell.openExternal(url)
 | 
						||
      })
 | 
						||
    }
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
    return { action: 'deny' }
 | 
						||
  })
 | 
						||
})
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 15. Do not use `shell.openExternal` with untrusted content
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The shell module's [`openExternal`][open-external] API allows opening a given
 | 
						||
protocol URI with the desktop's native utilities. On macOS, for instance, this
 | 
						||
function is similar to the `open` terminal command utility and will open the
 | 
						||
specific application based on the URI and filetype association.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Improper use of [`openExternal`][open-external] can be leveraged to compromise
 | 
						||
the user's host. When openExternal is used with untrusted content, it can be
 | 
						||
leveraged to execute arbitrary commands.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
//  Bad
 | 
						||
const { shell } = require('electron')
 | 
						||
shell.openExternal(USER_CONTROLLED_DATA_HERE)
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
//  Good
 | 
						||
const { shell } = require('electron')
 | 
						||
shell.openExternal('https://example.com/index.html')
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 16. Use a current version of Electron
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You should strive for always using the latest available version of Electron.
 | 
						||
Whenever a new major version is released, you should attempt to update your
 | 
						||
app as quickly as possible.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
An application built with an older version of Electron, Chromium, and Node.js
 | 
						||
is an easier target than an application that is using more recent versions of
 | 
						||
those components. Generally speaking, security issues and exploits for older
 | 
						||
versions of Chromium and Node.js are more widely available.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Both Chromium and Node.js are impressive feats of engineering built by
 | 
						||
thousands of talented developers. Given their popularity, their security is
 | 
						||
carefully tested and analyzed by equally skilled security researchers. Many of
 | 
						||
those researchers [disclose vulnerabilities responsibly][responsible-disclosure],
 | 
						||
which generally means that researchers will give Chromium and Node.js some time
 | 
						||
to fix issues before publishing them. Your application will be more secure if
 | 
						||
it is running a recent version of Electron (and thus, Chromium and Node.js) for
 | 
						||
which potential security issues are not as widely known.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Migrate your app one major version at a time, while referring to Electron's
 | 
						||
[Breaking Changes][breaking-changes] document to see if any code needs to
 | 
						||
be updated.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### 17. Validate the `sender` of all IPC messages
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You should always validate incoming IPC messages `sender` property to ensure you
 | 
						||
aren't performing actions or sending information to untrusted renderers.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### Why?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
All Web Frames can in theory send IPC messages to the main process, including
 | 
						||
iframes and child windows in some scenarios.  If you have an IPC message that returns
 | 
						||
user data to the sender via `event.reply` or performs privileged actions that the renderer
 | 
						||
can't natively, you should ensure you aren't listening to third party web frames.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You should be validating the `sender` of **all** IPC messages by default.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
#### How?
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```js title='main.js (Main Process)'
 | 
						||
// Bad
 | 
						||
ipcMain.handle('get-secrets', () => {
 | 
						||
  return getSecrets();
 | 
						||
});
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
// Good
 | 
						||
ipcMain.handle('get-secrets', (e) => {
 | 
						||
  if (!validateSender(e.senderFrame)) return null;
 | 
						||
  return getSecrets();
 | 
						||
});
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
function validateSender(frame) {
 | 
						||
  // Value the host of the URL using an actual URL parser and an allowlist
 | 
						||
  if ((new URL(frame.url)).host === 'electronjs.org') return true;
 | 
						||
  return false;
 | 
						||
}
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[breaking-changes]: ../breaking-changes.md
 | 
						||
[browser-window]: ../api/browser-window.md
 | 
						||
[browser-view]: ../api/browser-view.md
 | 
						||
[webview-tag]: ../api/webview-tag.md
 | 
						||
[web-contents]: ../api/web-contents.md
 | 
						||
[window-open-handler]: ../api/web-contents.md#contentssetwindowopenhandlerhandler
 | 
						||
[will-navigate]: ../api/web-contents.md#event-will-navigate
 | 
						||
[open-external]: ../api/shell.md#shellopenexternalurl-options
 | 
						||
[responsible-disclosure]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_disclosure
 |