electron/docs/api/browser-view.md

104 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# BrowserView
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
A `BrowserView` can be used to embed additional web content into a
2017-11-29 11:13:45 +00:00
[`BrowserWindow`](browser-window.md). It is like a child window, except that it is positioned
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
relative to its owning window. It is meant to be an alternative to the
`webview` tag.
## Class: BrowserView
> Create and control views.
Process: [Main](../glossary.md#main-process)
This module cannot be used until the `ready` event of the `app`
module is emitted.
### Example
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
```js
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
// In the main process.
const { app, BrowserView, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
app.whenReady().then(() => {
const win = new BrowserWindow({ width: 800, height: 600 })
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
const view = new BrowserView()
win.setBrowserView(view)
view.setBounds({ x: 0, y: 0, width: 300, height: 300 })
view.webContents.loadURL('https://electronjs.org')
})
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
```
### `new BrowserView([options])` _Experimental_
* `options` Object (optional)
* `webPreferences` [WebPreferences](structures/web-preferences.md?inline) (optional) - Settings of web page's features.
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
### Instance Properties
Objects created with `new BrowserView` have the following properties:
#### `view.webContents` _Experimental_
2017-05-10 23:28:24 +00:00
A [`WebContents`](web-contents.md) object owned by this view.
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
### Instance Methods
Objects created with `new BrowserView` have the following instance methods:
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
#### `view.setAutoResize(options)` _Experimental_
* `options` Object
* `width` boolean (optional) - If `true`, the view's width will grow and shrink together
2017-05-10 21:29:57 +00:00
with the window. `false` by default.
* `height` boolean (optional) - If `true`, the view's height will grow and shrink
2017-05-10 21:29:57 +00:00
together with the window. `false` by default.
* `horizontal` boolean (optional) - If `true`, the view's x position and width will grow
and shrink proportionally with the window. `false` by default.
* `vertical` boolean (optional) - If `true`, the view's y position and height will grow
and shrink proportionally with the window. `false` by default.
#### `view.setBounds(bounds)` _Experimental_
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
* `bounds` [Rectangle](structures/rectangle.md)
Resizes and moves the view to the supplied bounds relative to the window.
#### `view.getBounds()` _Experimental_
Returns [`Rectangle`](structures/rectangle.md)
The `bounds` of this BrowserView instance as `Object`.
#### `view.setBackgroundColor(color)` _Experimental_
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a `BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20). To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead of Electron-specific bugs. For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow performance. Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the future. Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`, which... - is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents) - is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike `<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents) - needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking changes. In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple `BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
* `color` string - Color in Hex, RGB, ARGB, HSL, HSLA or named CSS color format. The alpha channel is
optional for the hex type.
Examples of valid `color` values:
* Hex
* #fff (RGB)
* #ffff (ARGB)
* #ffffff (RRGGBB)
* #ffffffff (AARRGGBB)
* RGB
* rgb\((\[\d]+),\s*(\[\d]+),\s*(\[\d]+)\)
* e.g. rgb(255, 255, 255)
* RGBA
* rgba\((\[\d]+),\s*(\[\d]+),\s*(\[\d]+),\s*(\[\d.]+)\)
* e.g. rgba(255, 255, 255, 1.0)
* HSL
* hsl\((-?\[\d.]+),\s*(\[\d.]+)%,\s*(\[\d.]+)%\)
* e.g. hsl(200, 20%, 50%)
* HSLA
* hsla\((-?\[\d.]+),\s*(\[\d.]+)%,\s*(\[\d.]+)%,\s*(\[\d.]+)\)
* e.g. hsla(200, 20%, 50%, 0.5)
* Color name
* Options are listed in [SkParseColor.cpp](https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/skia/src/utils/SkParseColor.cpp;l=11-152;drc=eea4bf52cb0d55e2a39c828b017c80a5ee054148)
* Similar to CSS Color Module Level 3 keywords, but case-sensitive.
* e.g. `blueviolet` or `red`
**Note:** Hex format with alpha takes `AARRGGBB` or `ARGB`, _not_ `RRGGBBA` or `RGA`.