electron/docs/tutorial/security.md

# Security, Native Capabilities, and Your Responsibility

As web developers, we usually enjoy the strong security net of the browser -
the risks associated with the code we write are relatively small. Our websites
are granted limited powers in a sandbox, and we trust that our users enjoy a
browser built by a large team of engineers that is able to quickly respond to
newly discovered security threats.

When working with Electron, it is important to understand that Electron is not
a web browser. It allows you to build feature-rich desktop applications with
familiar web technologies, but your code wields much greater power. JavaScript
can access the filesystem, user shell, and more. This allows you to build
high quality native applications, but the inherent security risks scale with
the additional powers granted to your code.

With that in mind, be aware that displaying arbitrary content from untrusted
sources poses a severe security risk that Electron is not intended to handle.
In fact, the most popular Electron apps (Atom, Slack, Visual Studio Code, etc)
display primarily local content (or trusted, secure remote content without Node
integration) – if your application executes code from an online source, it is
your responsibility to ensure that the code is not malicious.

## Reporting Security Issues

For information on how to properly disclose an Electron vulnerability,
see [SECURITY.md](https://github.com/electron/electron/tree/master/SECURITY.md)

## Chromium Security Issues and Upgrades

Electron keeps up to date with alternating Chromium releases. For more information,
see the [Electron Release Cadence blog post](https://electronjs.org/blog/12-week-cadence).

## Security Is Everyone's Responsibility

It is important to remember that the security of your Electron application is
the result of the overall security of the framework foundation
(*Chromium*, *Node.js*), Electron itself, all NPM dependencies and
your code. As such, it is your responsibility to follow a few important best
practices:

* **Keep your application up-to-date with the latest Electron framework release.**
When releasing your product, you’re also shipping a bundle composed of Electron,
Chromium shared library and Node.js. Vulnerabilities affecting these components
may impact the security of your application. By updating Electron to the latest
version, you ensure that critical vulnerabilities (such as *nodeIntegration bypasses*)
are already patched and cannot be exploited in your application. For more information,
see "[Use a current version of Electron](#17-use-a-current-version-of-electron)".

* **Evaluate your dependencies.** While NPM provides half a million reusable packages,
it is your responsibility to choose trusted 3rd-party libraries. If you use outdated
libraries affected by known vulnerabilities or rely on poorly maintained code,
your application security could be in jeopardy.

* **Adopt secure coding practices.** The first line of defense for your application
is your own code. Common web vulnerabilities, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS),
have a higher security impact on Electron applications hence it is highly recommended
to adopt secure software development best practices and perform security testing.

## Isolation For Untrusted Content

A security issue exists whenever you receive code from an untrusted source (e.g.
a remote server) and execute it locally. As an example, consider a remote
website being displayed inside a default [`BrowserWindow`][browser-window]. If
an attacker somehow manages to change said content (either by attacking the
source directly, or by sitting between your app and the actual destination), they
will be able to execute native code on the user's machine.

> :warning: Under no circumstances should you load and execute remote code with
Node.js integration enabled. Instead, use only local files (packaged together
with your application) to execute Node.js code. To display remote content, use
the [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tag or [`BrowserView`][browser-view], make sure
to disable the `nodeIntegration` and enable `contextIsolation`.

## Electron Security Warnings

From Electron 2.0 on, developers will see warnings and recommendations printed
to the developer console. They only show up when the binary's name is Electron,
indicating that a developer is currently looking at the console.

You can force-enable or force-disable these warnings by setting
`ELECTRON_ENABLE_SECURITY_WARNINGS` or `ELECTRON_DISABLE_SECURITY_WARNINGS` on
either `process.env` or the `window` object.

## Checklist: Security Recommendations

You should at least follow these steps to improve the security of your application:

1. [Only load secure content](#1-only-load-secure-content)
2. [Disable the Node.js integration in all renderers that display remote content](#2-do-not-enable-nodejs-integration-for-remote-content)
3. [Enable context isolation in all renderers that display remote content](#3-enable-context-isolation-for-remote-content)
4. [Use `ses.setPermissionRequestHandler()` in all sessions that load remote content](#4-handle-session-permission-requests-from-remote-content)
5. [Do not disable `webSecurity`](#5-do-not-disable-websecurity)
6. [Define a `Content-Security-Policy`](#6-define-a-content-security-policy) and use restrictive rules (i.e. `script-src 'self'`)
7. [Do not set `allowRunningInsecureContent` to `true`](#7-do-not-set-allowrunninginsecurecontent-to-true)
8. [Do not enable experimental features](#8-do-not-enable-experimental-features)
9. [Do not use `enableBlinkFeatures`](#9-do-not-use-enableblinkfeatures)
10. [`<webview>`: Do not use `allowpopups`](#10-do-not-use-allowpopups)
11. [`<webview>`: Verify options and params](#11-verify-webview-options-before-creation)
12. [Disable or limit navigation](#12-disable-or-limit-navigation)
13. [Disable or limit creation of new windows](#13-disable-or-limit-creation-of-new-windows)
14. [Do not use `openExternal` with untrusted content](#14-do-not-use-openexternal-with-untrusted-content)
15. [Disable the `remote` module](#15-disable-the-remote-module)
16. [Filter the `remote` module](#16-filter-the-remote-module)
17. [Use a current version of Electron](#17-use-a-current-version-of-electron)

To automate the detection of misconfigurations and insecure patterns, it is
possible to use
[electronegativity](https://github.com/doyensec/electronegativity). For
additional details on potential weaknesses and implementation bugs when
developing applications using Electron, please refer to this [guide for
developers and auditors](https://doyensec.com/resources/us-17-Carettoni-Electronegativity-A-Study-Of-Electron-Security-wp.pdf)

## 1) Only Load Secure Content

Any resources not included with your application should be loaded using a
secure protocol like `HTTPS`. In other words, do not use insecure protocols
like `HTTP`. Similarly, we recommend the use of `WSS` over `WS`, `FTPS` over
`FTP`, and so on.

### Why?

`HTTPS` has three main benefits:

1) It authenticates the remote server, ensuring your app connects to the correct
   host instead of an impersonator.
2) It ensures data integrity, asserting that the data was not modified while in
   transit between your application and the host.
3) It encrypts the traffic between your user and the destination host, making it
   more difficult to eavesdrop on the information sent between your app and
   the host.

### How?

```js
// Bad
browserWindow.loadURL('http://example.com')

// Good
browserWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
```

```html
<!-- Bad -->
<script crossorigin src="http://example.com/react.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://example.com/style.css">

<!-- Good -->
<script crossorigin src="https://example.com/react.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://example.com/style.css">
```

## 2) Do not enable Node.js Integration for Remote Content

_This recommendation is the default behavior in Electron since 5.0.0._

It is paramount that you do not enable Node.js integration in any renderer
([`BrowserWindow`][browser-window], [`BrowserView`][browser-view], or
[`<webview>`][webview-tag]) that loads remote content. The goal is to limit the
powers you grant to remote content, thus making it dramatically more difficult
for an attacker to harm your users should they gain the ability to execute
JavaScript on your website.

After this, you can grant additional permissions for specific hosts. For example,
if you are opening a BrowserWindow pointed at `https://example.com/`, you can
give that website exactly the abilities it needs, but no more.

### Why?

A cross-site-scripting (XSS) attack is more dangerous if an attacker can jump
out of the renderer process and execute code on the user's computer.
Cross-site-scripting attacks are fairly common - and while an issue, their
power is usually limited to messing with the website that they are executed on.
Disabling Node.js integration helps prevent an XSS from being escalated into a
so-called "Remote Code Execution" (RCE) attack.

### How?

```js
// Bad
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    nodeIntegration: true,
    nodeIntegrationInWorker: true
  }
})

mainWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    preload: path.join(app.getAppPath(), 'preload.js')
  }
})

mainWindow.loadURL('https://example.com')
```

```html
<!-- Bad -->
<webview nodeIntegration src="page.html"></webview>

<!-- Good -->
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
```

When disabling Node.js integration, you can still expose APIs to your website that
do consume Node.js modules or features. Preload scripts continue to have access
to `require` and other Node.js features, allowing developers to expose a custom
API to remotely loaded content.

In the following example preload script, the later loaded website will have
access to a `window.readConfig()` method, but no Node.js features.

```js
const { readFileSync } = require('fs')

window.readConfig = function () {
  const data = readFileSync('./config.json')
  return data
}
```

## 3) Enable Context Isolation for Remote Content

Context isolation is an Electron feature that allows developers to run code
in preload scripts and in Electron APIs in a dedicated JavaScript context. In
practice, that means that global objects like `Array.prototype.push` or
`JSON.parse` cannot be modified by scripts running in the renderer process.

Electron uses the same technology as Chromium's [Content Scripts](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/content_scripts#execution-environment)
to enable this behavior.

Even when you use `nodeIntegration: false` to enforce strong isolation and
prevent the use of Node primitives, `contextIsolation` must also be used.

### Why & How?

For more information on what `contextIsolation` is and how to enable it please
see our dedicated [Context Isolation](context-isolation.md) document.

## 4) Handle Session Permission Requests From Remote Content

You may have seen permission requests while using Chrome: They pop up whenever
the website attempts to use a feature that the user has to manually approve (
like notifications).

The API is based on the [Chromium permissions API](https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/permissions)
and implements the same types of permissions.

### Why?

By default, Electron will automatically approve all permission requests unless
the developer has manually configured a custom handler. While a solid default,
security-conscious developers might want to assume the very opposite.

### How?

```js
const { session } = require('electron')

session
  .fromPartition('some-partition')
  .setPermissionRequestHandler((webContents, permission, callback) => {
    const url = webContents.getURL()

    if (permission === 'notifications') {
      // Approves the permissions request
      callback(true)
    }

    // Verify URL
    if (!url.startsWith('https://example.com/')) {
      // Denies the permissions request
      return callback(false)
    }
  })
```

## 5) Do Not Disable WebSecurity

_Recommendation is Electron's default_

You may have already guessed that disabling the `webSecurity` property on a
renderer process ([`BrowserWindow`][browser-window],
[`BrowserView`][browser-view], or [`<webview>`][webview-tag]) disables crucial
security features.

Do not disable `webSecurity` in production applications.

### Why?

Disabling `webSecurity` will disable the same-origin policy and set
`allowRunningInsecureContent` property to `true`. In other words, it allows
the execution of insecure code from different domains.

### How?

```js
// Bad
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    webSecurity: false
  }
})
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow()
```

```html
<!-- Bad -->
<webview disablewebsecurity src="page.html"></webview>

<!-- Good -->
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
```

## 6) Define a Content Security Policy

A Content Security Policy (CSP) is an additional layer of protection against
cross-site-scripting attacks and data injection attacks. We recommend that they
be enabled by any website you load inside Electron.

### Why?

CSP allows the server serving content to restrict and control the resources
Electron can load for that given web page. `https://example.com` should
be allowed to load scripts from the origins you defined while scripts from
`https://evil.attacker.com` should not be allowed to run. Defining a CSP is an
easy way to improve your application's security.

The following CSP will allow Electron to execute scripts from the current
website and from `apis.example.com`.

```plaintext
// Bad
Content-Security-Policy: '*'

// Good
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' https://apis.example.com
```

### CSP HTTP Header

Electron respects the [`Content-Security-Policy` HTTP header](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy)
which can be set using Electron's
[`webRequest.onHeadersReceived`](../api/web-request.md#webrequestonheadersreceivedfilter-listener)
handler:

```javascript
const { session } = require('electron')

session.defaultSession.webRequest.onHeadersReceived((details, callback) => {
  callback({
    responseHeaders: {
      ...details.responseHeaders,
      'Content-Security-Policy': ['default-src \'none\'']
    }
  })
})
```

### CSP Meta Tag

CSP's preferred delivery mechanism is an HTTP header, however it is not possible
to use this method when loading a resource using the `file://` protocol. It can
be useful in some cases, such as using the `file://` protocol, to set a policy
on a page directly in the markup using a `<meta>` tag:

```html
<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="default-src 'none'">
```

## 7) Do Not Set `allowRunningInsecureContent` to `true`

_Recommendation is Electron's default_

By default, Electron will not allow websites loaded over `HTTPS` to load and
execute scripts, CSS, or plugins from insecure sources (`HTTP`). Setting the
property `allowRunningInsecureContent` to `true` disables that protection.

Loading the initial HTML of a website over `HTTPS` and attempting to load
subsequent resources via `HTTP` is also known as "mixed content".

### Why?

Loading content over `HTTPS` assures the authenticity and integrity
of the loaded resources while encrypting the traffic itself. See the section on
[only displaying secure content](#1-only-load-secure-content) for more details.

### How?

```js
// Bad
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    allowRunningInsecureContent: true
  }
})
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({})
```

## 8) Do Not Enable Experimental Features

_Recommendation is Electron's default_

Advanced users of Electron can enable experimental Chromium features using the
`experimentalFeatures` property.

### Why?

Experimental features are, as the name suggests, experimental and have not been
enabled for all Chromium users. Furthermore, their impact on Electron as a whole
has likely not been tested.

Legitimate use cases exist, but unless you know what you are doing, you should
not enable this property.

### How?

```js
// Bad
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    experimentalFeatures: true
  }
})
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({})
```

## 9) Do Not Use `enableBlinkFeatures`

_Recommendation is Electron's default_

Blink is the name of the rendering engine behind Chromium. As with
`experimentalFeatures`, the `enableBlinkFeatures` property allows developers to
enable features that have been disabled by default.

### Why?

Generally speaking, there are likely good reasons if a feature was not enabled
by default. Legitimate use cases for enabling specific features exist. As a
developer, you should know exactly why you need to enable a feature, what the
ramifications are, and how it impacts the security of your application. Under
no circumstances should you enable features speculatively.

### How?

```js
// Bad
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    enableBlinkFeatures: 'ExecCommandInJavaScript'
  }
})
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow()
```

## 10) Do Not Use `allowpopups`

_Recommendation is Electron's default_

If you are using [`<webview>`][webview-tag], you might need the pages and scripts
loaded in your `<webview>` tag to open new windows. The `allowpopups` attribute
enables them to create new [`BrowserWindows`][browser-window] using the
`window.open()` method. `<webview>` tags are otherwise not allowed to create new
windows.

### Why?

If you do not need popups, you are better off not allowing the creation of
new [`BrowserWindows`][browser-window] by default. This follows the principle
of minimally required access: Don't let a website create new popups unless
you know it needs that feature.

### How?

```html
<!-- Bad -->
<webview allowpopups src="page.html"></webview>

<!-- Good -->
<webview src="page.html"></webview>
```

## 11) Verify WebView Options Before Creation

A WebView created in a renderer process that does not have Node.js integration
enabled will not be able to enable integration itself. However, a WebView will
always create an independent renderer process with its own `webPreferences`.

It is a good idea to control the creation of new [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tags
from the main process and to verify that their webPreferences do not disable
security features.

### Why?

Since `<webview>` live in the DOM, they can be created by a script running on your
website even if Node.js integration is otherwise disabled.

Electron enables developers to disable various security features that control
a renderer process. In most cases, developers do not need to disable any of
those features - and you should therefore not allow different configurations
for newly created [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tags.

### How?

Before a [`<webview>`][webview-tag] tag is attached, Electron will fire the
`will-attach-webview` event on the hosting `webContents`. Use the event to
prevent the creation of `webViews` with possibly insecure options.

```js
app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
  contents.on('will-attach-webview', (event, webPreferences, params) => {
    // Strip away preload scripts if unused or verify their location is legitimate
    delete webPreferences.preload
    delete webPreferences.preloadURL

    // Disable Node.js integration
    webPreferences.nodeIntegration = false

    // Verify URL being loaded
    if (!params.src.startsWith('https://example.com/')) {
      event.preventDefault()
    }
  })
})
```

Again, this list merely minimizes the risk, it does not remove it. If your goal
is to display a website, a browser will be a more secure option.

## 12) Disable or limit navigation

If your app has no need to navigate or only needs to navigate to known pages,
it is a good idea to limit navigation outright to that known scope, disallowing
any other kinds of navigation.

### Why?

Navigation is a common attack vector. If an attacker can convince your app to
navigate away from its current page, they can possibly force your app to open
web sites on the Internet. Even if your `webContents` are configured to be more
secure (like having `nodeIntegration` disabled or `contextIsolation` enabled),
getting your app to open a random web site will make the work of exploiting your
app a lot easier.

A common attack pattern is that the attacker convinces your app's users to
interact with the app in such a way that it navigates to one of the attacker's
pages. This is usually done via links, plugins, or other user-generated content.

### How?

If your app has no need for navigation, you can call `event.preventDefault()`
in a [`will-navigate`][will-navigate] handler. If you know which pages your app
might navigate to, check the URL in the event handler and only let navigation
occur if it matches the URLs you're expecting.

We recommend that you use Node's parser for URLs. Simple string comparisons can
sometimes be fooled - a `startsWith('https://example.com')` test would let
`https://example.com.attacker.com` through.

```js
const URL = require('url').URL

app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
  contents.on('will-navigate', (event, navigationUrl) => {
    const parsedUrl = new URL(navigationUrl)

    if (parsedUrl.origin !== 'https://example.com') {
      event.preventDefault()
    }
  })
})
```

## 13) Disable or limit creation of new windows

If you have a known set of windows, it's a good idea to limit the creation of
additional windows in your app.

### Why?

Much like navigation, the creation of new `webContents` is a common attack
vector. Attackers attempt to convince your app to create new windows, frames,
or other renderer processes with more privileges than they had before; or
with pages opened that they couldn't open before.

If you have no need to create windows in addition to the ones you know you'll
need to create, disabling the creation buys you a little bit of extra
security at no cost. This is commonly the case for apps that open one
`BrowserWindow` and do not need to open an arbitrary number of additional
windows at runtime.

### How?

[`webContents`][web-contents] will emit the [`new-window`][new-window] event
before creating new windows. That event will be passed, amongst other
parameters, the `url` the window was requested to open and the options used to
create it. We recommend that you use the event to scrutinize the creation of
windows, limiting it to only what you need.

```js
const { shell } = require('electron')

app.on('web-contents-created', (event, contents) => {
  contents.on('new-window', async (event, navigationUrl) => {
    // In this example, we'll ask the operating system
    // to open this event's url in the default browser.
    event.preventDefault()

    await shell.openExternal(navigationUrl)
  })
})
```

## 14) Do not use `openExternal` with untrusted content

Shell's [`openExternal`][open-external] allows opening a given protocol URI with
the desktop's native utilities. On macOS, for instance, this function is similar
to the `open` terminal command utility and will open the specific application
based on the URI and filetype association.

### Why?

Improper use of [`openExternal`][open-external] can be leveraged to compromise
the user's host. When openExternal is used with untrusted content, it can be
leveraged to execute arbitrary commands.

### How?

```js
//  Bad
const { shell } = require('electron')
shell.openExternal(USER_CONTROLLED_DATA_HERE)
```

```js
//  Good
const { shell } = require('electron')
shell.openExternal('https://example.com/index.html')
```

## 15) Disable the `remote` module

The `remote` module provides a way for the renderer processes to
access APIs normally only available in the main process. Using it, a
renderer can invoke methods of a main process object without explicitly sending
inter-process messages. If your desktop application does not run untrusted
content, this can be a useful way to have your renderer processes access and
work with modules that are only available to the main process, such as
GUI-related modules (dialogs, menus, etc.).

However, if your app can run untrusted content and even if you
[sandbox][sandbox] your renderer processes accordingly, the `remote` module
makes it easy for malicious code to escape the sandbox and have access to
system resources via the higher privileges of the main process. Therefore,
it should be disabled in such circumstances.

### Why?

`remote` uses an internal IPC channel to communicate with the main process.
"Prototype pollution" attacks can grant malicious code access to the internal
IPC channel, which can then be used to escape the sandbox by mimicking `remote`
IPC messages and getting access to main process modules running with higher
privileges.

Additionally, it's possible for preload scripts to accidentally leak modules to a
sandboxed renderer. Leaking `remote` arms malicious code with a multitude
of main process modules with which to perform an attack.

Disabling the `remote` module eliminates these attack vectors. Enabling
context isolation also prevents the "prototype pollution" attacks from
succeeding.

### How?

```js
// Bad if the renderer can run untrusted content
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    enableRemoteModule: true
  }
})
```

```js
// Good
const mainWindow = new BrowserWindow({
  webPreferences: {
    enableRemoteModule: false
  }
})
```

```html
<!-- Bad if the renderer can run untrusted content  -->
<webview enableremotemodule="true" src="page.html"></webview>

<!-- Good -->
<webview enableremotemodule="false" src="page.html"></webview>
```

> **Note:** The default value of `enableRemoteModule` is `false` starting
> from Electron 10. For prior versions, you need to explicitly disable
> the `remote` module by the means above.

## 16) Filter the `remote` module

If you cannot disable the `remote` module, you should filter the globals,
Node, and Electron modules (so-called built-ins) accessible via `remote`
that your application does not require. This can be done by blocking
certain modules entirely and by replacing others with proxies that
expose only the functionality that your app needs.

### Why?

Due to the system access privileges of the main process, functionality
provided by the main process modules may be dangerous in the hands of
malicious code running in a compromised renderer process. By limiting
the set of accessible modules to the minimum that your app needs and
filtering out the others, you reduce the toolset that malicious code
can use to attack the system.

Note that the safest option is to
[fully disable the remote module](#15-disable-the-remote-module). If
you choose to filter access rather than completely disable the module,
you must be very careful to ensure that no escalation of privilege is
possible through the modules you allow past the filter.

### How?

```js
const readOnlyFsProxy = require(/* ... */) // exposes only file read functionality

const allowedModules = new Set(['crypto'])
const proxiedModules = new Map(['fs', readOnlyFsProxy])
const allowedElectronModules = new Set(['shell'])
const allowedGlobals = new Set()

app.on('remote-require', (event, webContents, moduleName) => {
  if (proxiedModules.has(moduleName)) {
    event.returnValue = proxiedModules.get(moduleName)
  }
  if (!allowedModules.has(moduleName)) {
    event.preventDefault()
  }
})

app.on('remote-get-builtin', (event, webContents, moduleName) => {
  if (!allowedElectronModules.has(moduleName)) {
    event.preventDefault()
  }
})

app.on('remote-get-global', (event, webContents, globalName) => {
  if (!allowedGlobals.has(globalName)) {
    event.preventDefault()
  }
})

app.on('remote-get-current-window', (event, webContents) => {
  event.preventDefault()
})

app.on('remote-get-current-web-contents', (event, webContents) => {
  event.preventDefault()
})
```

## 17) Use a current version of Electron

You should strive for always using the latest available version of Electron.
Whenever a new major version is released, you should attempt to update your
app as quickly as possible.

### Why?

An application built with an older version of Electron, Chromium, and Node.js
is an easier target than an application that is using more recent versions of
those components. Generally speaking, security issues and exploits for older
versions of Chromium and Node.js are more widely available.

Both Chromium and Node.js are impressive feats of engineering built by
thousands of talented developers. Given their popularity, their security is
carefully tested and analyzed by equally skilled security researchers. Many of
those researchers [disclose vulnerabilities responsibly][responsible-disclosure],
which generally means that researchers will give Chromium and Node.js some time
to fix issues before publishing them. Your application will be more secure if
it is running a recent version of Electron (and thus, Chromium and Node.js) for
which potential security issues are not as widely known.

[browser-window]: ../api/browser-window.md
[browser-view]: ../api/browser-view.md
[webview-tag]: ../api/webview-tag.md
[web-contents]: ../api/web-contents.md
[new-window]: ../api/web-contents.md#event-new-window
[will-navigate]: ../api/web-contents.md#event-will-navigate
[open-external]: ../api/shell.md#shellopenexternalurl-options
[sandbox]: ../api/sandbox-option.md
[responsible-disclosure]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_disclosure