Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2017 GitHub, Inc.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by the MIT license that can be
|
|
|
|
// found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-19 20:46:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/api/electron_api_browser_view.h"
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-27 21:28:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-28 16:47:08 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "content/browser/renderer_host/render_widget_host_view_base.h" // nogncheck
|
|
|
|
#include "content/public/browser/render_widget_host_view.h"
|
2022-09-01 00:40:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/api/electron_api_base_window.h"
|
2019-06-19 20:46:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/api/electron_api_web_contents.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/browser.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/native_browser_view.h"
|
2020-10-27 21:28:43 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/ui/drag_util.h"
|
2022-03-28 16:47:08 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/browser/web_contents_preferences.h"
|
2019-06-19 20:46:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/color_util.h"
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/gin_converters/gfx_converter.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/gin_helper/dictionary.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/gin_helper/object_template_builder.h"
|
2019-06-19 20:46:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/node_includes.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "shell/common/options_switches.h"
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "ui/gfx/geometry/rect.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace gin {
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
|
|
struct Converter<electron::AutoResizeFlags> {
|
|
|
|
static bool FromV8(v8::Isolate* isolate,
|
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::Value> val,
|
|
|
|
electron::AutoResizeFlags* auto_resize_flags) {
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
gin_helper::Dictionary params;
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!ConvertFromV8(isolate, val, ¶ms)) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t flags = 0;
|
|
|
|
bool width = false;
|
|
|
|
if (params.Get("width", &width) && width) {
|
|
|
|
flags |= electron::kAutoResizeWidth;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool height = false;
|
|
|
|
if (params.Get("height", &height) && height) {
|
|
|
|
flags |= electron::kAutoResizeHeight;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-01-31 02:07:19 +00:00
|
|
|
bool horizontal = false;
|
|
|
|
if (params.Get("horizontal", &horizontal) && horizontal) {
|
|
|
|
flags |= electron::kAutoResizeHorizontal;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool vertical = false;
|
|
|
|
if (params.Get("vertical", &vertical) && vertical) {
|
|
|
|
flags |= electron::kAutoResizeVertical;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*auto_resize_flags = static_cast<electron::AutoResizeFlags>(flags);
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
} // namespace gin
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int32_t GetNextId() {
|
|
|
|
static int32_t next_id = 1;
|
|
|
|
return next_id++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-29 19:55:47 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace electron::api {
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
gin::WrapperInfo BrowserView::kWrapperInfo = {gin::kEmbedderNativeGin};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 01:15:23 +00:00
|
|
|
BrowserView::BrowserView(gin::Arguments* args,
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
const gin_helper::Dictionary& options)
|
|
|
|
: id_(GetNextId()) {
|
2019-10-15 01:15:23 +00:00
|
|
|
v8::Isolate* isolate = args->isolate();
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
gin_helper::Dictionary web_preferences =
|
|
|
|
gin::Dictionary::CreateEmpty(isolate);
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
options.Get(options::kWebPreferences, &web_preferences);
|
2019-05-20 10:55:46 +00:00
|
|
|
web_preferences.Set("type", "browserView");
|
2020-12-15 23:52:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::Value> value;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 17:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
// Copy the webContents option to webPreferences.
|
2020-12-15 23:52:43 +00:00
|
|
|
if (options.Get("webContents", &value)) {
|
|
|
|
web_preferences.SetHidden("webContents", value);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto web_contents =
|
|
|
|
WebContents::CreateFromWebPreferences(args->isolate(), web_preferences);
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
web_contents_.Reset(isolate, web_contents.ToV8());
|
|
|
|
api_web_contents_ = web_contents.get();
|
2020-10-27 21:28:43 +00:00
|
|
|
api_web_contents_->AddObserver(this);
|
2018-11-08 15:57:28 +00:00
|
|
|
Observe(web_contents->web_contents());
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-19 07:50:30 +00:00
|
|
|
view_.reset(
|
2020-11-17 22:15:20 +00:00
|
|
|
NativeBrowserView::Create(api_web_contents_->inspectable_web_contents()));
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-01 00:40:02 +00:00
|
|
|
void BrowserView::SetOwnerWindow(BaseWindow* window) {
|
2021-11-15 15:23:31 +00:00
|
|
|
// Ensure WebContents and BrowserView owner windows are in sync.
|
|
|
|
if (web_contents())
|
2022-09-01 00:40:02 +00:00
|
|
|
web_contents()->SetOwnerWindow(window ? window->window() : nullptr);
|
2021-11-15 15:23:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-17 15:10:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (owner_window_.get()) {
|
|
|
|
owner_window_->window()->remove_inspectable_view(
|
|
|
|
view_->GetInspectableWebContentsView());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-15 15:23:31 +00:00
|
|
|
owner_window_ = window ? window->GetWeakPtr() : nullptr;
|
2022-10-17 15:10:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (owner_window_.get() && view_->GetInspectableWebContentsView())
|
|
|
|
owner_window_->window()->add_inspectable_view(
|
|
|
|
view_->GetInspectableWebContentsView());
|
2021-11-15 15:23:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
BrowserView::~BrowserView() {
|
2021-11-15 15:23:31 +00:00
|
|
|
if (web_contents()) { // destroy() called without closing WebContents
|
|
|
|
web_contents()->RemoveObserver(this);
|
|
|
|
web_contents()->Destroy();
|
2018-11-08 15:57:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void BrowserView::WebContentsDestroyed() {
|
|
|
|
api_web_contents_ = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
web_contents_.Reset();
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
Unpin();
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-27 21:28:43 +00:00
|
|
|
void BrowserView::OnDraggableRegionsUpdated(
|
|
|
|
const std::vector<mojom::DraggableRegionPtr>& regions) {
|
2022-10-17 15:10:07 +00:00
|
|
|
InspectableWebContentsView* iwc_view = view_->GetInspectableWebContentsView();
|
|
|
|
if (!iwc_view)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
iwc_view->UpdateDraggableRegions(regions);
|
2020-10-27 21:28:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
// static
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
gin::Handle<BrowserView> BrowserView::New(gin_helper::ErrorThrower thrower,
|
|
|
|
gin::Arguments* args) {
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!Browser::Get()->is_ready()) {
|
2019-10-15 01:15:23 +00:00
|
|
|
thrower.ThrowError("Cannot create BrowserView before app is ready");
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return gin::Handle<BrowserView>();
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
gin::Dictionary options = gin::Dictionary::CreateEmpty(args->isolate());
|
2019-07-26 23:18:13 +00:00
|
|
|
args->GetNext(&options);
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
auto handle =
|
|
|
|
gin::CreateHandle(args->isolate(), new BrowserView(args, options));
|
|
|
|
handle->Pin(args->isolate());
|
|
|
|
return handle;
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
void BrowserView::SetAutoResize(AutoResizeFlags flags) {
|
|
|
|
view_->SetAutoResizeFlags(flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
void BrowserView::SetBounds(const gfx::Rect& bounds) {
|
|
|
|
view_->SetBounds(bounds);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-30 02:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
gfx::Rect BrowserView::GetBounds() {
|
|
|
|
return view_->GetBounds();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
void BrowserView::SetBackgroundColor(const std::string& color_name) {
|
2022-03-28 16:47:08 +00:00
|
|
|
SkColor color = ParseCSSColor(color_name);
|
|
|
|
view_->SetBackgroundColor(color);
|
2021-11-09 16:36:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-22 00:38:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (web_contents()) {
|
|
|
|
auto* wc = web_contents()->web_contents();
|
2022-03-21 17:35:54 +00:00
|
|
|
wc->SetPageBaseBackgroundColor(ParseCSSColor(color_name));
|
2022-03-28 16:47:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto* const rwhv = wc->GetRenderWidgetHostView();
|
|
|
|
if (rwhv) {
|
|
|
|
rwhv->SetBackgroundColor(color);
|
|
|
|
static_cast<content::RenderWidgetHostViewBase*>(rwhv)
|
|
|
|
->SetContentBackgroundColor(color);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure new color is stored in webPreferences, otherwise
|
|
|
|
// the color will be reset on the next load via HandleNewRenderFrame.
|
|
|
|
auto* web_preferences = WebContentsPreferences::From(wc);
|
|
|
|
if (web_preferences)
|
|
|
|
web_preferences->SetBackgroundColor(color);
|
2021-11-22 00:38:05 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::Value> BrowserView::GetWebContents(v8::Isolate* isolate) {
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (web_contents_.IsEmpty()) {
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return v8::Null(isolate);
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return v8::Local<v8::Value>::New(isolate, web_contents_);
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// static
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate> BrowserView::FillObjectTemplate(
|
|
|
|
v8::Isolate* isolate,
|
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate> templ) {
|
|
|
|
return gin::ObjectTemplateBuilder(isolate, "BrowserView", templ)
|
2017-04-12 11:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
.SetMethod("setAutoResize", &BrowserView::SetAutoResize)
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
.SetMethod("setBounds", &BrowserView::SetBounds)
|
2019-07-30 02:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
.SetMethod("getBounds", &BrowserView::GetBounds)
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
.SetMethod("setBackgroundColor", &BrowserView::SetBackgroundColor)
|
2017-11-21 12:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
.SetProperty("webContents", &BrowserView::GetWebContents)
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
.Build();
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-29 19:55:47 +00:00
|
|
|
} // namespace electron::api
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using electron::api::BrowserView;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void Initialize(v8::Local<v8::Object> exports,
|
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::Value> unused,
|
|
|
|
v8::Local<v8::Context> context,
|
|
|
|
void* priv) {
|
|
|
|
v8::Isolate* isolate = context->GetIsolate();
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-21 07:05:40 +00:00
|
|
|
gin_helper::Dictionary dict(isolate, exports);
|
2020-07-09 15:48:39 +00:00
|
|
|
dict.Set("BrowserView", BrowserView::GetConstructor(context));
|
Implement initial, experimental BrowserView API
Right now, `<webview>` is the only way to embed additional content in a
`BrowserWindow`. Unfortunately `<webview>` suffers from a [number of
problems](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3Awebview%20).
To make matters worse, many of these are upstream Chromium bugs instead
of Electron-specific bugs.
For us at [Figma](https://www.figma.com), the main issue is very slow
performance.
Despite the upstream improvements to `<webview>` through the OOPIF work, it is
probable that there will continue to be `<webview>`-specific bugs in the
future.
Therefore, this introduces a `<webview>` alternative to called `BrowserView`,
which...
- is a thin wrapper around `api::WebContents` (so bugs in `BrowserView` will
likely also be bugs in `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- is instantiated in the main process like `BrowserWindow` (and unlike
`<webview>`, which lives in the DOM of a `BrowserWindow` web contents)
- needs to be added to a `BrowserWindow` to display something on the screen
This implements the most basic API. The API is expected to evolve and change in
the near future and has consequently been marked as experimental. Please do not
use this API in production unless you are prepared to deal with breaking
changes.
In the future, we will want to change the API to support multiple
`BrowserView`s per window. We will also want to consider z-ordering
auto-resizing, and possibly even nested views.
2017-04-11 17:47:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-14 11:25:39 +00:00
|
|
|
NODE_LINKED_MODULE_CONTEXT_AWARE(electron_browser_browser_view, Initialize)
|