234 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
234 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
This page's purpose is to collect and explore plans for a future
|
|
annex.version.
|
|
|
|
There are two major possible changes that could go in a new repo
|
|
version that would require a hard migration of git-annex repositories:
|
|
|
|
1. Changing .git/annex/objects/ paths, as appear in the git-annex symlinks.
|
|
|
|
2. Changing the layout of the git-annex branch in a substantial way.
|
|
|
|
## object path changes
|
|
|
|
Any change in this area requires the user make changes to their master
|
|
branch, any other active branches. Old un-converted tags and other
|
|
historical trees in git would also be broken. This is a pretty bad user
|
|
experience. (And it bloats history with a commit that rewrites everything
|
|
too.
|
|
|
|
For this reason, any changes in this area have been avoided, going all the
|
|
way back to v2 (2011).
|
|
|
|
> git-annex had approximately 3 users at the
|
|
> time of that migration, and as one of them, I can say it was a total PITA.
|
|
--[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
So, there would need to be significant payoffs to justify this change.
|
|
|
|
Note that changing the hash directories might also change where objects are
|
|
stored in special remotes. Because repos can be offline or expensive to
|
|
migrate (or both -- Glacier!) any such changes need to keep looking in the
|
|
old locations for backwards compatability.
|
|
|
|
Possible reasons to make changes:
|
|
|
|
* It's annoyingly inconsistent that git-annex uses a different hash
|
|
directory layout for non-bare repository (on a non-crippled filesystem)
|
|
than is used for bare repositories and some special remotes.
|
|
|
|
Users occasionally stumble over this difference when messing with
|
|
internals. The code is somewhat complicated by it. In some cases,
|
|
git-annex checks both locations (eg, a bare repo defaults to xxx/yyy
|
|
but really old ones might use xX/yY for some keys).
|
|
|
|
The mixed case hash directories have caused trouble on case-insensative
|
|
filesystems, although that has mostly been papered over to avoid
|
|
problems. One remaining problem users can stuble on occurs
|
|
when [[moving a repository from OSX to Linux|bugs/OSX_case_insensitive_filesystem]].
|
|
|
|
* The hash directories, and also the per-key directories
|
|
can slow down using a repository on a disk (both SSD and spinning).
|
|
|
|
<https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/32>
|
|
|
|
Initial benchmarks suggest that going from xX/yY/KEY/OBJ to xX/yY/OBJ
|
|
directories would improve speed 3x.
|
|
|
|
Presumably, removing the yY would also speed it up, unless there are too
|
|
many objects and the filesystem gets slow w/o the hash directories.
|
|
|
|
* Removing a directory level would also reduce disk usage, see [[forum/scalability_with_lots_of_files/]] for more info.
|
|
|
|
## git-annex branch changes
|
|
|
|
This might involve, eg, rethinking the xxx/yyy/ hash directories used
|
|
in the git-annex branch.
|
|
|
|
Would this require a hard version transition? It might be possible to avoid
|
|
one, but then git-annex would have to look in both the old and the new
|
|
place. And if a un-transitioned repo was merged into a transitioned one,
|
|
git-annex would have to look in *both* places, and union merge the two sets
|
|
of data on the fly. This doubles the git-cat-file overhead of every
|
|
operation involving the git-annex branch. So a hard transition would
|
|
probably be best.
|
|
|
|
Also, note that w/o a hard transition, there's the risk that a old
|
|
git-annex version gets ahold of a git-annex branch created by a new
|
|
git-annex version, and sees only half of the story (the un-transitioned
|
|
files). This could be a very confusing failure mode. It doesn't help that
|
|
the git-annex branch does not currently have any kind of
|
|
version number embedded in it, so the old version of git-annex doesn't even
|
|
have a way to check if it can handle the branch.
|
|
|
|
Possible reasons to make changes:
|
|
|
|
* There is a discussion of some possible changes to the hash directories here
|
|
<https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/17#issuecomment-68558319> with a
|
|
goal of reducing the overhead of the git-annex branch in the overall size
|
|
of the git-annex repository.
|
|
|
|
Removing the second-level hash directories might improve performance.
|
|
It doesn't save much space when a repository is having incremental changes
|
|
made to it. However, if millions of annexed objects are being added
|
|
in a single commit, removing the second-level hash directories does save
|
|
space; it halves the number of tree
|
|
objects[1](https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/17#issuecomment-68759754).
|
|
|
|
Also,
|
|
<https://github.com/datalad/datalad/issues/17#issuecomment-68569727>
|
|
suggests using xxx/yyy.log, where one log contains information for
|
|
multiple keys. This would probably improve performance too due to
|
|
caching, although in some cases git-annex would have to process extra
|
|
information to get to the info about the key it wants, which hurts
|
|
performance. The disk usage change of this method has not yet been
|
|
quantified.
|
|
|
|
* Another reason to do it would be improving git-annex to use vector clocks,
|
|
instead of its current assumption that client's clocks are close enough to
|
|
accurate. This would presumably change the contents of the files.
|
|
|
|
* While not a sufficient reason on its own, the best practices for file
|
|
formats in the git-annex branch has evolved over time, and there are some
|
|
files that have unusual formats for historical reasons. Other files have
|
|
modern formats, but their parsers have to cope with old versions that
|
|
have other formats. A hard transition would provide an opportunity to
|
|
clean up a lot of that.
|
|
|
|
## living on the edge
|
|
|
|
Rather than a hard transition, git-annex could add a mode
|
|
that could be optionally enabled when initing a repo for the first time.
|
|
|
|
Users who know they need that mode could then turn it one, and get the
|
|
benefits, while everyone else avoids a transition that doesn't benefit them
|
|
much.
|
|
|
|
There could even be multiple modes, with different tradeoffs depending on
|
|
how the repo will be used, its size, etc. Of course that adds complexity.
|
|
|
|
But the main problem with this idea is, how to avoid the foot shooting
|
|
result of merging repo A(v5) into repo B(vNG)? This seems like it would be
|
|
all to easy for a user to do.
|
|
|
|
As far as git-annex branch changes go, it might be possible for git-annex
|
|
to paper over the problem by handling both versions in the merged git-annex
|
|
branch, as discussed earlier. But for .git/annex/objects/ changes, there
|
|
does not seem to be a reasonable thing for git-annex to do. When it's
|
|
receiving an object into a mixed v5 and vNG repo, it can't know which
|
|
location that repo expects the object file to be located in. Different
|
|
files in the repo might point to the same object in different locations!
|
|
Total mess. Must avoid this.
|
|
|
|
Currently, annex.version is a per-local-repo setting. git-annex can't tell
|
|
if two repos that it's merging have different annex.version's.
|
|
|
|
It would be possible to add a git-annex:version file, which would work for
|
|
git-annex branch merging. Ie, `git-annex merge` could detect if different
|
|
git-annex branches have different versions, and refuse to merge them (or
|
|
upgrade the old one before merging it).
|
|
|
|
Also, that file could be used by git-annex, to automatically set
|
|
annex.version when auto-initing a clone of a repo that was initted with
|
|
a newer than default version.
|
|
|
|
But git-anex:version won't prevent merging B/master into A's master.
|
|
That merge can be done by git; nothing in git-annex can prevent it.
|
|
|
|
What we could do is have a .annex-version flag file in the root of the
|
|
repo. Then git merge would at least have a merge conflict. Note that this
|
|
means inflicting the file on all git-annex repos, even ones used by people
|
|
with no intention of living on the edge. And, it would take quite a while
|
|
until all such repos get updated to contain such a file.
|
|
|
|
Or, we could just document that if you initialize a repo with experimental
|
|
annex.version, you're living on the edge and you can screw up your repo
|
|
by merging with a repo from an old version.
|
|
|
|
git-annex fsck could also fix up any broken links that do result from the
|
|
inevitable cases where users ignore the docs.
|
|
|
|
## version numbers vs configuration
|
|
|
|
A particular annex.version like 5 encompasses a number of somewhat distinct
|
|
things
|
|
|
|
* git-annex branch layout
|
|
* .git/annex/objects/ layout
|
|
* other git stuff (like eg, the name of the HEAD branch in direct mode)
|
|
|
|
If the user is specifying at `git annex init` time some nonstandard things
|
|
they want to make the default meet their use case better, that is more
|
|
a matter of configuration than of picking a version.
|
|
|
|
For example, we could say that the user is opting out of the second-level
|
|
object hash directories. Or we could say the user is choosing to use vNG,
|
|
which is like v5 except with different object hash directory structure.
|
|
|
|
git annex init --config annex.objects.hashdirectories 1
|
|
--config annex.objects.hashlower true
|
|
git annex init --version 6
|
|
|
|
The former would be more flexible. The latter is simpler.
|
|
|
|
The former also lets the user chose *no* hash directories, or
|
|
choose 2 levels of hash directories while using the (v5 default) mixed
|
|
case hashing.
|
|
|
|
## concrete design
|
|
|
|
Make git-annex:difference.log be used by newer git-annex versions than v5,
|
|
and by nonstandard configurations.
|
|
|
|
The file contents will be "timestamp uuid [value, ..]", where value is a
|
|
serialized data type that describes divergence from v5 (since v5 and older
|
|
don't have the git-annex:difference.log file).
|
|
|
|
So, for example, "[Version 6]" could indicate that v6 is being used. Or,
|
|
"[ObjectHashLower True, ObjectHashDirectories 1, BranchHashDirectories 1]"
|
|
indicate a nonstandard configuration on top of v5 (this might turn out to
|
|
be identical to v6; just make the compare equal and no problem).
|
|
|
|
git-annex merge would check if it's merging in a git-annex:difference.log from
|
|
another repo that doesn't match the git-annex:difference.log of the local repo,
|
|
and abort. git-annex sync (and the assistant) would check the same, but
|
|
before merging master branches either, to avoid a bad merge there.
|
|
|
|
The git-annex:difference.log of a local repo could be changed by an upgrade
|
|
or some sort of transition. When this happens, the new value is written
|
|
for the uuid of the local repo. git-annex merge would then refuse to merge
|
|
with remote repos until they were also transitioned.
|
|
|
|
(There's perhaps some overlap here with the existing
|
|
git-annex:transitions.log, however the current transitions involve
|
|
forgetting history/dead remotes and so can be done repeatedly on a
|
|
repository. Also, the current transitions can be performed on remote
|
|
branches before merging them in; that wouldn't work well for version
|
|
changes since those require other changes in the remote repo.)
|
|
|
|
Not covered:
|
|
|
|
* git-merge of other branches, such as master (can be fixed by `git annex
|
|
fix` or `fsck`)
|
|
* Old versions of git-annex will ignore the version file of course,
|
|
and so merging such repos using them can result in pain.
|
|
|