40aab719df
in= was problimatic in two ways. First, it referred to a remote by name, but preferred content expressions can be evaluated elsewhere, where that remote doesn't exist, or a different remote has the same name. This name lookup code could error out at runtime. Secondly, in= seemed pretty useless. in=here did not cause content to be gotten, but it did let present content be dropped. present is more useful, although "not present" is unstable and should be avoided. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Group.hs | ||
| Location.hs | ||
| PreferredContent.hs | ||
| Presence.hs | ||
| Remote.hs | ||
| Transfer.hs | ||
| Trust.hs | ||
| Unused.hs | ||
| UUID.hs | ||
| UUIDBased.hs | ||
| Web.hs | ||