30 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
Say I have:
|
|
|
|
$> git remote
|
|
Alpha
|
|
Beta
|
|
Gamma
|
|
Delta
|
|
|
|
It is easy to sync with all repos via:
|
|
|
|
$> git annex sync
|
|
|
|
Or specific repos via:
|
|
|
|
$> git annex sync Alpha Beta
|
|
|
|
However, it is currently awkward to exclude specific repos. Is it possible to 'invert' or 'negate' specific remotes, so that the following are equivalent?
|
|
|
|
$> git annex sync \! Gamma
|
|
$> git annex sync Alpha Beta Delta
|
|
|
|
This problem comes up surprisingly often due to:
|
|
|
|
1. An external host being temporarily down (which causes sync to hang for a while),
|
|
2. Repos being available, but the machine is under heavy IO load or memory pressure,
|
|
3. Repos on external drives that are swapped out and mounted to a specific location (e.g., /mnt/),
|
|
4. Wanting to roll out repo-wide changes in stages, or keeping 1-2 repos untouched for whatever reason, or
|
|
5. Some repos being too large for a machine (e.g., repacking fails due to low memory), but which can still act like a dumb file-store.
|
|
|
|
The problem gets worse when you have a lot of remotes or a lot of repos to manage (I have both). My impression is that this feature would require a syntax addition for git-annex-sync only. I like '!' because it behaves the same in GNU find and sh.
|