adcebbae47
Implemented alternateJournal, which git-remote-annex
uses to avoid any writes to the git-annex branch while setting up
a special remote from an annex:: url.
That prevents the remote.log from being overwritten with the special
remote configuration from the url, which might not be 100% the same as
the existing special remote configuration.
And it prevents an overwrite deleting of other stuff that was
already in the remote.log.
Also, when the branch was created by git-remote-annex, only delete it
at the end if nothing else has been written to it by another command.
This fixes the race condition described in
797f27ab05, where git-remote-annex
set up the branch and git-annex init and other commands were
run at the same time and their writes to the branch were lost.
70 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
git-remote-annex will be a program that allows push/pull/clone of a git
|
|
repository to many types of git-annex special remote.
|
|
|
|
This is a redesign and reimplementation of git-remote-datalad-annex.
|
|
It will be a safer implementation, will support incremental pushes, and
|
|
will be available to users who don't use datalad.
|
|
--[[Joey]]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
This is implememented and working. Remaining todo list for it:
|
|
|
|
* Test incremental push edge cases involving checkprereq.
|
|
|
|
* Cloning from an annex:: url with importtree=yes doesn't work
|
|
(with or without exporttree=yes). This is because the ContentIdentifier
|
|
db is not populated.
|
|
|
|
* It would be nice if git-annex could generate an annex:: url
|
|
for a special remote and show it to the user, eg when
|
|
they have set the shorthand "annex::" url, so they know the full url.
|
|
`git-annex info $remote` could also display it.
|
|
Currently, the user has to remember how the special remote was
|
|
configured and replicate it all in the url.
|
|
|
|
There are some difficulties to doing this, including that
|
|
RemoteConfig can have hidden fields that should be omitted.
|
|
|
|
* initremote/enableremote could have an option that configures the url to a
|
|
special remote to a annex:: url. This would make it easier to use
|
|
git-remote-annex, since the user would not need to set up the url
|
|
themselves. (Also it would then avoid setting `skipFetchAll = true`)
|
|
|
|
* Improve recovery from interrupted push by using outManifest to clean up
|
|
after it. (Requires populating outManifest.)
|
|
|
|
* See XXX in uploadManifest about recovering from a situation
|
|
where the remote is left with a deleted manifest when a push
|
|
is interrupted part way through. This should be recoverable
|
|
by caching the manifest locally and re-uploading it when
|
|
the remote has no manifest or prompting the user to merge and re-push.
|
|
|
|
* datalad-annex supports cloning from the web special remote,
|
|
using an url that contains the result of pushing to eg, a directory
|
|
special remote.
|
|
`datalad-annex::https://example.com?type=web&url={noquery}`
|
|
Supporting something like this would be good.
|
|
|
|
* Improve behavior in push races. A race can overwrite a change
|
|
to the MANIFEST and lose work that was pushed from the other repo.
|
|
From the user's perspective, that situation is the same as if one repo
|
|
pushed new work, then the other repo did a git push --force, overwriting
|
|
the first repo's push. In the first repo, another push will then fail as
|
|
a non fast-forward, and the user can recover as usual. This is probably
|
|
okish.
|
|
|
|
But.. a MANIFEST overwrite will leave bundle files in the remote that
|
|
are not listed in the MANIFEST. It seems likely that git-annex could
|
|
detect that after the fact and clean it up. Eg, if it caches
|
|
the last MANIFEST it uploaded, next time it downloads the MANIFEST
|
|
it can check if there are bundle files in the old one that are not
|
|
in the new one. If so, it can drop those bundle files from the remote.
|
|
|
|
* A push race can also appear to the user as if they pushed a ref, but then
|
|
it got deleted from the remote. This happens when two pushes are
|
|
pushing different ref names. This might be harder for the user to
|
|
notice; git fetch does not indicate that a remote ref got deleted.
|
|
They would have to use git fetch --prune to notice the deletion.
|
|
Once the user does notice, they can re-push their ref to recover.
|
|
Can this be improved?
|