git-annex/Database
Joey Hess a3370ac459 allow for concurrent incremental fsck processes again (sorta)
Sqlite doesn't support multiple concurrent writers
at all. One of them will fail to write. It's not even possible to have two
processes building up separate transactions at the same time. Before using
sqlite, incremental fsck could work perfectly well with multiple fsck
processes running concurrently. I'd like to keep that working.

My partial solution, so far, is to make git-annex buffer writes, and every
so often send them all to sqlite at once, in a transaction. So most of the
time, nothing is writing to the database. (And if it gets unlucky and
a write fails due to a collision with another writer, it can just wait and
retry the write later.) This lets multiple processes write to the database
successfully.

But, for the purposes of concurrent, incremental fsck, it's not ideal.
Each process doesn't immediately learn of files that another process has
checked. So they'll tend to do redundant work.

Only way I can see to improve this is to use some other mechanism for
short-term IPC between the fsck processes. Not yet done.

----

Also, make addDb check if an item is in the database already, and not try
to re-add it. That fixes an intermittent crash with
"SQLite3 returned ErrorConstraint while attempting to perform step."

I am not 100% sure why; it only started happening when I moved write
buffering into the queue. It seemed to generally happen on the same file
each time, so could just be due to multiple files having the same key.
However, I doubt my sound repo has many duplicate keys, and I suspect
something else is going on.

----

Updated benchmark, with the 1000 item queue: 6m33.808s
2015-02-17 16:56:12 -04:00
..
Fsck.hs allow for concurrent incremental fsck processes again (sorta) 2015-02-17 16:56:12 -04:00
Handle.hs allow for concurrent incremental fsck processes again (sorta) 2015-02-17 16:56:12 -04:00
Types.hs convert incremental fsck to using sqlite database 2015-02-16 15:35:26 -04:00