git-annex/doc/todo/parallel_possibilities.mdwn
Joey Hess 3eac4e01a4
idea
2019-06-05 19:43:01 -04:00

36 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

git-annex has good support for running commands in parallel, but there
are still some things that could be improved, tracked here:
* Maybe support -Jn in more commands. Just needs changing a few lines of code
and testing each.
* Maybe extend --jobs/annex.jobs for more control. `--jobs=cpus` is already
supported; it might be good to have `--jobs=cpus-1` to leave a spare
cpu to avoid contention, or `--jobs=remotes*2` to run 2 jobs per remote.
* Parallelism is often used when the user wants to full saturate the pipe
to a remote, since having some extra transfers running avoid being
delayed while git-annex runs cleanup actions, checksum verification,
and other non-transfer stuff.
But, the user will sometimes be disappointed, because every job
can still end up stuck doing checksum verification at the same time,
so the pipe to the remote is not saturated.
Now that cleanup actions don't occupy space in the main worker queue,
all that needs to be done is make checksum verification be done as the
cleanup action. Currently, it's bundled into the same action that
transfers content.
* Don't parallelize start stage actions. They are supposed to run fast,
and often a huge number of them don't print out anything. The overhead of
bookkeeping for parallizing those swamps the benefit of parallelizing by
what seems to be a large degree. Compare `git annex get` in a directory
where the first several thousand files are already present with and
without -J.
Only once the start stage has decided
something needs to be done should a job be started up.
This probably needs display of any output to be moved out of the start
stage, because no console region will be allocated for it.