12 lines
739 B
Text
12 lines
739 B
Text
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
|
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
|
|
nickname="Richard"
|
|
subject="comment 3"
|
|
date="2011-04-05T23:24:17Z"
|
|
content="""
|
|
Assuming you're storing your encrypted annex with me and I with you, our regular cron jobs to verify all data will catch corruption in each other's annexes.
|
|
|
|
Checksums of the encrypted objects could be optional, mitigating any potential attack scenarios.
|
|
|
|
It's not only about the cost of setting up new remotes. It would also be a way to keep data in one annex while making it accessible only in a subset of them. For example, I might need some private letters at work, but I don't want my work machine to be able to access them all.
|
|
"""]]
|