Previous change caused them to be skipped. Probably when @RPATH is
included in the path, it's a path to a file that actually exists.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
So that importing does not replace them with plain files.
This works similarly to how the previous handling of submodules and
matchers did, except that annexed symlinks still get exported as plain
files of course, it's only non-annexed symlinks that it does not make sense
to export.
When symlinks have previously been exported, updating the export will
unexport them after upgrading to this commit.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
This was needed when supporting old git-annex-shell that do not support
p2pstdio yet, in order to cleanly fall back to the old interface without
error messages being displayed. That is no longer supported, so simplify
to not intercept error messages.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's DANDI project
Started in 2017 in commit 3fe9d99f24.
Starting tomorrow, all versions of git-annex since then will provide
an appid, and so it will no longer be necessary to check the date.
Sponsored-by: Nicholas Golder-Manning on Patreon
Capstone to this feature. Any transitions that have been performed on an
unmerged remote ref but not on the local git-annex branch, or vice-versa
have to be applied on the fly when reading files.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
It would display incomplete information, which would differ from the
information displayed with write access. So refuse to display anything.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
It would be difficult to make Annex.Branch.files query the unmerged
git-annex branches. Might be possible, similar to what was discussed in
7f6b2ca49c but again I decided to make it
not do anything in that situation to start with before adding such a
complicated thing.
git-annex info uses it when getting info about a repostory. The choices
were to make that fail with an error, or display the info it can, and
change the output slightly for the bits of info it cannot access. While
that is a behavior change, and I want to avoid any behavior changes due
to unmerged git-annex branches in a read-only repo, displaying a message
that is not a number seems unlikely to break anything that was consuming
a number, any worse than throwing an exception would. Probably.
Also git-annex unused --from origin is made to throw an error, but
it would fail later anyway when trying to write to the unused log files.
Sponsored-by: Dartmouth College's Datalad project
