RemoteGitConfig parsing looks for annex.stalldetection when a remote
does not have a per-remote config for it, so no need for a separate
gobal config.
Sponsored-by: Noam Kremen on Patreon
Bug fix: Git configs such as annex.verify were incorrectly overriding
per-remote git configs such as remote.name.annex-verify.
This dates all the way back to 2013,
commit 8a5b397ac4,
where hlint apparently somehow confused me into parsing in the wrong
order. Before that it was correct.
Amazing noone has noticed until now.
Sponsored-by: Kevin Mueller on Patreon
Probably this fixes a reversion, but I don't know what version broke it.
This does use withOtherTmp for a temp file that could be quite large.
Though albeit a reflink copy that will not actually take up any space
as long as the file it was copied from still exists. So if the copy cow
succeeds but git-annex is interrupted just before that temp file gets
renamed into the usual .git/annex/tmp/ location, there is a risk that
the other temp directory ends up cluttered with a larger temp file than
later. It will eventually be cleaned up, and the changes of this being
a problem are small, so this seems like an acceptable thing to do.
Sponsored-by: Shae Erisson on Patreon
Added annex.bwlimit and remote.name.annex-bwlimit config that works for git
remotes and many but not all special remotes.
This nearly works, at least for a git remote on the same disk. With it set
to 100kb/1s, the meter displays an actual bandwidth of 128 kb/s, with
occasional spikes to 160 kb/s. So it needs to delay just a bit longer...
I'm unsure why.
However, at the beginning a lot of data flows before it determines the
right bandwidth limit. A granularity of less than 1s would probably improve
that.
And, I don't know yet if it makes sense to have it be 100ks/1s rather than
100kb/s. Is there a situation where the user would want a larger
granularity? Does granulatity need to be configurable at all? I only used that
format for the config really in order to reuse an existing parser.
This can't support for external special remotes, or for ones that
themselves shell out to an external command. (Well, it could, but it
would involve pausing and resuming the child process tree, which seems
very hard to implement and very strange besides.) There could also be some
built-in special remotes that it still doesn't work for, due to them not
having a progress meter whose displays blocks the bandwidth using thread.
But I don't think there are actually any that run a separate thread for
downloads than the thread that displays the progress meter.
Sponsored-by: Graham Spencer on Patreon
I was not able to test the whole build because of a very strange
Prelude.chr: bad argument: 469762054
Which I assume is a problem with this version of ghc or the way I was
using stack.
The stack.yaml that builds it used this patch
diff --git a/stack.yaml b/stack.yaml
index 790bffff2..8bcbaa0ec 100644
--- a/stack.yaml
+++ b/stack.yaml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
flags:
git-annex:
- production: true
+ production: false
assistant: true
pairing: true
torrentparser: true
@@ -18,13 +18,15 @@ extra-deps:
- IfElse-0.85
- aws-0.22
- bloomfilter-2.0.1.0
-- filepath-bytestring-1.4.2.1.6
-- git-lfs-1.1.0
-- http-client-restricted-0.0.3
+- filepath-bytestring-1.4.2.1.8
+- git-lfs-1.1.1
+- http-client-restricted-0.0.4
- network-multicast-0.3.2
- sandi-0.5
- torrent-10000.1.1
- bencode-0.6.1.1
+- base16-bytestring-0.1.1.7
+- base64-bytestring-1.0.0.3
explicit-setup-deps:
git-annex: true
-resolver: lts-16.27
+resolver: nightly-2021-09-07
